Preview

Responsibilities for Offerings of Securities

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6642 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Responsibilities for Offerings of Securities
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
J. Thomas Talbot, a member of the board of directors of Fidelity National Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation, traded on confidential information about the impending acquisition of LendingTree, Inc., which he received in his capacity as a Fidelity director. We must decide whether Talbot can be held liable under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder, for misappropriating information from Fidelity, in the absence of a fiduciary duty of confidentiality owed to LendingTree by Fidelity or Talbot when he executed the trades. We hold that Talbot can be held liable, under the circumstances here, but that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the issue of materiality. We therefore reverse and remand the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Talbot.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Facts
J. Thomas Talbot is a businessman and attorney who, for the past thirty years, has served as a director on the boards of several companies. In April 2003, Talbot sat on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. ("Fidelity"), a publicly traded Delaware corporation and national title insurance company. Fidelity owned approximately a 10 percent interest in LendingTree, Inc. ("LendingTree"), an online lending and realty services exchange, which is publicly traded on the NASDAQ National Market System.
On April 18 or 19, 2003, LendingTree's CEO, Douglas Lebda, informed Brent [ 530 F.3d 1088 ] |

Bickett, Fidelity's Vice President, that negotiations were proceeding for a third party to acquire LendingTree. Lebda informed Bickett because, "as a significant shareholder of [LendingTree], we knew that [Fidelity] would need to ultimately consent to a transaction, if it happened." Although Lebda did not state the name of the potential acquirer, Lebda indicated that the "majority of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Memo

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As consultants for Ancher Public Trading (APT), Learning Team A would like to discuss the implications of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) legislation. This memorandum provides a brief history of SOX¡¦s creation, explains the relationship amongst the FASB, SEC and PCAOB, describes the pros and cons of SOX, assesses the impacts of SOX, and lists ethical considerations of SOX.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The plaintiff, Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC, presented a securities fraud class action against the defendant, Charter Communications’ vendors, Scientific-Atlanta. Charter communications is a publicly traded cable company that services millions of customers throughout America. Charter contracts with vendors for equipment that is used for their company. Charter had Scientific-Atlanta sell set-top cable boxes at a higher price than the normal selling price. Scientific-Atlanta also sold advertisement at a rate four to five times higher than normal rates. These abnormally increased rates caused inflation in Charter’s stock price. Stoneridge Investment Partners also claimed that Charter Communications wanted Scientific-Atlanta to purchase advertising on its networks just to enhance their revenue. Stoneridge Investment Partners sued both Charter and Scientific-Atlanta under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The claims against all other defendants other than Scientific-Atlanta were resolved. The District Court had to decide whether or not Scientific-Atlanta was a primary violator of the relevant statutes.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay will explain the following four questions. First, would registration with the SEC be required for Dakota Gasworks securities? Second, Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5? Third what theory or theories might a court use to hold Wallace liable for insider trading? Finally, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, who would be required to certify the accuracy of financial statements filed with the SEC?…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

    • 1322 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descriptions of the main aspects of the regulatory environment which will protect the public from fraud within corporations are going to be provided in this paper. A special attention to the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requirement; along with an evaluation of whether Sarbanes-Oxley Act will be effective in avoiding future frauds based on their implemented rules and regulations.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sec vs Ginsberg

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Scott Ginsburg served as chairman and CEO of Evergreen Media Corporation, an owner and operator of a group of radio stations. Ginsburg then began to show interest in acquiring EZ, another corporation that owned radio stations. After a brief meeting with Alan Box, the CEO of EZ, a phone call was made of which only the duration, 26 minutes, is known. The next Mark Ginsburg, the brother of CEO Scott Ginsburg, purchased 3800 shares of stock in EZ after discussing the purchase of this stock with Jordan Ginsburg, the father of he and Mark. Scott Ginsburg then talked to EZ’s investment banker, discussed the possibility of a bid, and signed a confidentiality agreement on July 16, the same day that Jordan Ginsburg purchased 20,000 shares of stock in EZ. The following day Scott received full disclosure of EZ’s financial status. Mark and Jordan continued…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 27th, 2001 Martha Stewart was contacted with some information that was clearly not public knowledge at the time. Her broker, Peter Bacanovic, had attempted to contact Stewart to inform her that ImClone shares were going downward and the Waksals were selling all their shares. Under the Client Information Privacy Policy of Merrill Lynch it clearly states that they “do not release client information, except upon a client’s authorization”. Bacanovic had ignored the policy and had chosen to inform Stewart of the Waksals selling of shares. From the beginning of this investigation, all parties involved claimed that the only reason for Stewart selling her shares was because of an agreement between her and Bacanovic that if the stock price…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act o

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The American government has taken significant measures to protect the public from fraud with-in corporations. Many federal laws have been enacted, regulatory bodies created and empowered to monitor and enforce those laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (SOX), of 2002 was an attempt to address several violations to the public trust from corporations that continued to occur despite the previous attempts to govern corporate responsibility to the public. This act specifically tried to reduce unethical corporate behavior and increase public confidence in the financial reporting of corporations (Kimmel, Weygandt, & Kieso, 2011). This paper will address if the requirements of SOX will be enough to prevent future fraud in the corporate environment.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the SEC’s inability to control Wall Street fraud, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission received sharp criticism from the public for its seemingly weak enforcement of Wall Street’s too big to fail banks. Many believe that the agency is unethically protecting Wall Street fraud due to the incident in 2010 when the National Archives had contacted the SEC expressing concern that an unauthorized destruction of federal records had…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Panera

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • Domenic Colasacco – Lead Independent Director; President and Chief Executive Officer of Boston Trust & Investment Management…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (4)The person must have known at the time that the claim was false, fictitious or fraudulent; and…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bernard Madoff

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: A (Very Brief) Encyclopedia of Securities Fraud. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2009, from http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2007-03-04/donley.shtml…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Insider Trading

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Insider trading" is a term that most investors have heard and usually associate with illegal conduct. But the term actually includes both legal and illegal conduct. Every day, investors have the opportunity to put their money into more than 15,000 U.S. stocks. It should come as no surprise to anyone that insider trading occurs every day in the stock market. In 1934 the U.S. Congress enacted the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to protect corporate investors, it realized that corporate investors had an unfair advantage when trading there own companies shares. What might surprise investors is that insider trading is done every day with full knowledge and sanction of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The activity we are referring to is the trading by directors and executives in their own companies' shares. However, obvious abuses by corporate insiders such as purchasing large amounts of shares just before their company is acquired at a premium, is still considered illegal. Insider trading allegations cause the general public to lose faith in what they thought was a stable and secure financial industry. If large investors can act on information that smaller investors do not have, the playing field is not level.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fabozzi F.J. et al. (1997): Securities Lending and Repurchase Agreements, USA: John Wiley and Sons.…

    • 21513 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organizing Paper

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Zuckerman, S. (1992, August 27). B of A close to acquiring Texas thrift. American Banker, 157(166), 1.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays