Preview

Revenge In Julius Caesar Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Revenge In Julius Caesar Research Paper
In William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar, revenge becomes a major theme between the conspirators and Antony. During an ongoing battle between Caesar’s men and the conspirators, many plans are discussed to end Caesar’s life. On the ides of March, the conspirators stab and kill Caesar. Antony, who is a one of Caesar’s closest men, vows to avenge Caesar’s death by taking down Brutus and the other conspirators. The plebeians and Antony then turn to violence and rise up against what they believe to be the unfair assassination of their leader.
The ides of March, an omen known to be a dangerous day for Caesar, brought blood shed to the city of Rome. Inside the Senate House, the conspirators gather around Caesar and plead for the return of an exile.
…show more content…
Soon after, Antony takes the stage with Caesar’s body and he “speaks not to disprove what Brutus spoke” but to speak what he knows (3.2.109). Antony tells the people that he has found Caesar’s will but he does not want to read it aloud. He is trying to paint Caesar as a saint who cared deeply about the plebeians and if they heard what was in Caesar’s will, their minds and hearts would stir with mutiny and rage because they would see the death of Caesar was unnecessary. The plebeians are soon begging to hear the will but Antony continues to say, “I have o’ershot myself to tell you of it. / I fear I wrong the honorable men / Whose daggers have stabbed Caesar. I do fear it” (3.2.163-164). This only pushes the plebeians into more of a frenzy as they say the “honorable men” are “traitors” and that “they were villains, murders” (3.2.165;3.2.167). Soon Antony has turned the plebeians against the conspirators as he says, “But were I Brutus, / And Brutus Antony, there were an Antony (...) The stones of Rome to rise and mutiny”(3.2. 240-242). Meaning if he was Brutus and Brutus was him, then he’d stir up the plebeians and install in each of Caesar’s wounds the kind voice that would convince even the stones of Rome to rise up and mutiny. It was Antony’s plan all along to turn the people against the conspirators as revenge for killing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the assassination of Caesar, Brutus explains his reasons for committing such an act. Antony deceives Brutus into believing that Antony understood their reasons and would join them as an ally. By becoming a supposed ally, Antony gains the advantage of trust, as Brutus trusts him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony goes against Brutus’ trust, and reveals Caesar’s will, and incites the plebeians to come to the conclusion that Caesar had been a good man, and that Brutus was in the wrong. Antony reveals his true intentions when he says to himself, “Mischief thou art afoot; / Take thou what course thou wilt” (III. iii. 275-276). Antony had taken advantage of the trust bestowed upon him by pulling off a brilliant act on his part, that effectively persuaded Brutus. Not only that, Antony also takes advantage of the trust that the plebeians had given him. His ulterior motives are revealed when he criticizes Lepidus’ ability to stand besides them and asks, “Is it fit, / The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it?” (IV. i. 15-17). This shows how Antony has no intention of fulfilling his promise made to the plebeians to uphold Caesar’s will. Instead, he wants to gain power for himself, and gets rid of Brutus and the other conspirators to get his way. He had acted as a perfect friend/ally to the plebeians as he acted to Brutus, and he also took advantage of them as well.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Caesar dies, all the conspirators try to figure out what to do with Antony, but he pleads that he is on their side, and he will do as they say to stay alive. This can be observed when he says “I know not, gentlemen, what you intend… I do beseech you, if you bear me hard, Now, whilst your purpled hands do reek and smoke, Fulfill your pleasure.” (Shakespeare 3.1.167). It initially sounds like he is pleading to them and using pathos to convince them, but after he’s completed his small speech he is, in fact, using logos by saying that is they spare him, he will be on their side. If they do not believe him, they can kill him, but what help will that do? Then they would have no one to testify that their actions were justified but them, and then the plebeians would not like their answer…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    unit 3 essay 3

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between 600 and 1450 CE., trade and exchange continually remained important and influential in around Eurasia and as well as in the Mexica society. Trade and exchange were main ideas that were both useful and necessary for success during this time. In Eurasia the use of the Silk Road and the Indian Ocean were both used as important trade routes. The Monsoons in the Indian Ocean were able to widen their agricultural standpoint allowing them to trade internally not only with their new goods but also with specific regions and their goods. In the Mexica society, surrounding territories had to pay a tribute to the Aztec capital and also had traded with surrounding areas. In the Islamic empires, goods such as cotton and spices were traded which were a continuous trade, in addition to the use of the Silk Road and the Indian Ocean, however, this led to new inventions, which then created the Aztec empire and later the crusades.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. The right “CM” side is where you record corresponding analysis: reactions, ideas, opinions, comments, inferences, insights, questions, etc. from your head. What is it about the writing that stands out and makes the work distinctive? The important part is that you, the reader, are reading something and then responding with analysis. Have a conversation with the text and with yourself.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony said he would not speak poorly about any of the conspirators, but he found away around it by using repetition (III,ii,84-96). He would question the characteristics of Caesar given from the conspirators to the people. Once he started to get the plebeians to think, he decides to show Julius’s stab wounds through his cloak. Antony tells them how he remembers the first time Caesar wore that cloak. Now, as he tells the story behind it, he has the people’s pity. With the people’s pity, they will beg to hear anything else about the great Caesar. Antony states that he has Caesar’s will with all the items Caesar gave to the great people, but he does not feel it is right to share the words written. The commoners beg until they hear it. Antony can now explain how the conspirators made even more of a mistake (III,ii,241-244;249-254).…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Rome begin to realize that one man should not have too much power because it will eventually corrupt him. Caesar’s council is the first to realize this, thus bringing questions such as, “'Caesar'? Why should that name be sounded more than yours?” (Shakespeare 12). Caesar’s determination to gain more supremacy slowly leads to his own friends deserting him. He is unaware of the fact that his own council is conspiring against him. This all leads up to the Ides of March, where each person from his council stabs him, leaving Caesar to fall in shock. His last words, "Et tu, Brute?" (Shakespeare 77) show that he is so surprised that even his best friend conspired against him. His failure to notice the conspiracy against him, eventually leads to his demise. This teaches one to not only be aware of your surroundings, but to not let power corrupt. Caesar’s fate was prophesized, but could have been avoided if only he used his free will to discover the plans of the…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Antony is looked upon as an irresponsible kid who likes to attend plays and go out at night. He was Caesar's loyal assistant. That Antony loved Caesar there is no doubt. There is, however, ample evidence that Antony was the "sleek-headed man" of whom Caesar warns in Act I. His oration at Caesar's funeral was more than an attempt to avenge Caesar's death. It was a power grab. Antony speaks of Caesar's will. During the civil war that follows, he changes the will. Antony ruthlessly orders the murder of hundreds of citizens.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Cassius, a main character, discussed the integral role of humanity's decisions, saying, "The fault...is not in our stars, but in ourselves" (I.ii.139-141). Within a modern context, Cassius's viewpoint is secular, demanding that all of us, not fate, is in control of the courses of our lives. However, it is also countercultural as our society ingrains itself in the norm of scapegoating, where humanity points to individuals/groups whom we can dump our rage for our societal plagues. Scapegoating is a topical issue today as we blame Islam for terrorism and sexism, Hispanics/African Americans for rape, drugs, and shootings, and etc. As we continue excluding different groups, our society confirms stereotypes…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays