He becomes more accusatory and petulant. He states that he must “reclaim [his] family life,” implying that it was taken from him, which presents him as a victim. By insisting that “even presidents have private lives,” Clinton is reasserting his authority and suggesting that presidents are just like everyone else. He implies that it is wrong to assume otherwise and that the investigation against him did exactly that. Clinton establishes himself as a victim again when he calls for the stop of the “pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into private lives.” The use of the dysphemisms “destruction” and “prying” also serves to imply that Clinton is a victim of a political movement, rather than at fault for having an affair with Lewinsky. By repeating the phrase “private life,” Clinton insists that he deserves one and that the affair is a matter for him to deal with, rather than the entire country
He becomes more accusatory and petulant. He states that he must “reclaim [his] family life,” implying that it was taken from him, which presents him as a victim. By insisting that “even presidents have private lives,” Clinton is reasserting his authority and suggesting that presidents are just like everyone else. He implies that it is wrong to assume otherwise and that the investigation against him did exactly that. Clinton establishes himself as a victim again when he calls for the stop of the “pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into private lives.” The use of the dysphemisms “destruction” and “prying” also serves to imply that Clinton is a victim of a political movement, rather than at fault for having an affair with Lewinsky. By repeating the phrase “private life,” Clinton insists that he deserves one and that the affair is a matter for him to deal with, rather than the entire country