Rhetorical Analysis Of Fairness By Hillary Clinton

This article by Hillary Clinton fails to show any holes in it’s logic or reasoning, this is mainly because she utilizes the use of ethos to her advantage. Since first impressions aren’t something that can be undone, making a good one is vital. Mrs. Clinton does just that by demonstrating her knowledge and expertise, she displays this by not only stating the issues we have with poverty but provides solutions. She notes that if elected president she will continue her life’s work which is focused on creating fairness for families. This shows her sense of goodwill and good moral which in essence persuades the audience to believe what she is saying. Her argument that our country needs to work on creating opportunities for children and fairness
to family is valid because the conclusion follows the premises. What this does it make little room for disagreement. Pathos is also used by Mrs. Clinton, she discusses how Donald J. Trump has a different approach and if he were to win presidency our economy would go back into a recession which would put more families into poverty. The only recommendation that I would have would be to include counter arguments into her article. If included then she is able to control the counter arguments more, than show how to counter them.