Rhetorical Analysis Of Mistrust Of Science By Atul Gawande

Evaluating aspects from a scientific perspective is not limited to only people who are pursuing science as a career or major. Atul Gawande, respected surgeon and author, understands this concept well and works to encourage the public to trust in testing a hypothesis no matter how profound. Through utilizing the strategies of incorporating personal experience, rhetorical questions, and a motivational tone, Gawande’s article, The Mistrust of Science, pushes readers to face challenges without a doubt. The Lewis Thomas Prize winner most certainly took advantage of using his own struggles of understanding science to portray how he isn’t so different from his ordinary readers. “When I came to college from my Ohio home town, the most intellectually unnerving thing I discovered was how wrong many of my assumptions were about how the world works—whether the natural or the human-made world” (Gawande 2). He creates a link between the audience and himself via building a sense of relation in which people will be more
He starts to conclude his piece with the following: “Today, you become part of the scientific community, arguably the most powerful collective enterprise in human history” (Gawande 18). Almost as if to honor his audience for their achievement, he grants everyone a valuable title by means of affirming the importance of people’s participation when it comes to studying the world. Readers will finally begin to recognize their role in what it takes to test a hypothesis, regardless of how narrow it may seem. “Even more than what you think, how you think matters . . . because we are not just battling for what it means to be scientists” (Gawande 20). He inspires others with fortitude before finishing his article in order to attain a lasting impact. Essentially, certifying one’s purpose in a significant matter proves to generate positive