Preview

Rhetorical Analysis of Obama's Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
79957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis of Obama's Speech
George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003) Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press. Noter om layout:
Sidetall øverst Et par figurer slettet Referanser til slutt

Innholdsfortegnelse i Word:
George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003) Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press. ...................................................................................................................... 1 Noter om layout:................................................................................................................... 1 Innholdsfortegnelse i Word:................................................................................................. 1 Contents................................................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 6 1. Concepts We Live By ..................................................................................................... 8 2. The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts ............................................................... 11 3. Metaphorical Systematicity: Highlighting and Hiding ................................................. 13 4. Orientational Metaphors ................................................................................................. 16 5. Metaphor and Cultural Coherence ................................................................................. 21 6 Ontological Metaphors ................................................................................................... 23 7. Personification................................................................................................................ 28 8. Metonymy....................................................................................................................... 29 9. Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence



References: Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28. Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning Construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. 1996. Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, No. 2, 133-187. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind 's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books. Feldman, .I. and Lakoff, G. Forthcoming. Front molecules to metaphors: The neural theory of language. Fernandez-Duque, D. & Johnson, M. 1999. Attention metaphors: Flow metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attentiara. Cognitive Science, 23, No. 1, 83-116. Fillmore, C. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea, (Ed.), linguistics in the morning calm, (pp. 111-138). Seoul: Hanshin. Fillmore, C. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quade r-ni di Semantica, 6, 222-253. Gibbs, R. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and under-standing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Grady. J. 1997. Foundations of meaning: Primat metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Johnson, C. 1999. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of SEE. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, and S. Wilcox, (Eds.), Cultural, ty((275)) pological and psychological issues in cognitive linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 152. pp. 155-169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Johnson, M. 1987. The body in. the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Johnson, M. 1993. Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Johnson, M., (Ed.) 1981. Philosophical perspectives on metaphor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Kovecses, Z. 1986. Metaphors anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Kovecses, Z. 1990. Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag. Kovecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in hu/Ilan feeling. Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press. Kovecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. 1990. Metaphor and War: The metaphor system used to justify war in the gulf. Originally distributed by electronic mail, December 1990. On the Web at: http://philosophy.uoregon.edu/metaphor/lakoff-l.htm. Also in Brien Hallet (Ed.). Engulfed in war: Just war and the persian gulf Honolulu: Matsunaga Institute for Peace, 1991. Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). 2nd. ed. Cambridge, England: Cam-bridge University Press. Lakoff, G. 1996. Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. 1997. How unconscious metaphorical thought shapes metaphor: Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Langacker, R. W. 1986. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. (Vols. 1-2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Langacker, R. W. 1990. Concept, image. and symbol: The cognitive basis of gramma. Berlin: Mouton dc Gruyter. McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Narayanan, S. 1997. Embodiment in language understanding: Sensory-motor representations for metaphoric reasoning about event descriptions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Regier,T. 1996. The human semantic potential. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ((276)) dreams. In D.J. Stein (Ed.) Cognitive .science and psychoanalysis. New York: American Psychoanalytic Association. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, G. & Nunez. R. 2000 Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathenutics into being. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. 1989. More than cool reason: A .field guide to poetic Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Taub, S. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in american sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Turner, M. 1987. Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor; criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Turner, M. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Turner, M. 1996. The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press. Winter, S. 2001. A clearing in the forest.: Law, life, and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Max Black build his ideas on Ivor’s assumptions and tried to bring the phenomenon to a more comprehensive and detailed investigation. Black on one hand, criticized the Aristotelian argument of ‘substitution’, on the other hand he elaborated on the ‘comparison’ perspective. Black’s main contribution is the refinement of Ivor’s ‘interaction’ views (Black 1962). The interaction view was first advocated by the literary theorist Richards (1936) and was subsequently developed by the philosopher Max Black (1962) both theories have two central claims: first, metaphors have an irreducible ‘cognitive content’, and that this cognitive content is produced by the ‘interaction’ of different cognitive systems. Interactionists generally claim that the ‘cognitive contents’ of metaphors can be true, even though they are not amenable to literal expression.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Burro Genius

    • 13815 Words
    • 56 Pages

    Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: U of California P, 1968.…

    • 13815 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    C. In between these two types of metaphors are metaphors which have lost “word power”…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She describes areas of the brain, such as Broca’s and Wernicke’s that are responsible for interpreting language. Additionally, she explores how narratives stimulate other areas of the brain not traditionally associated with language recognition. The research Murphy discusses in her article points out that metaphors were able to engage the sensory regions of the brain, whereas normal, less colorful, phrases did not. The brain instead treated the less colorful phrases as nothing more than mere words. Murphy also writes that, “words describing motion also stimulate regions of the brain distinct from language-processing areas.” (Murphy Paul, 2). Scans of the brains of subjects involved in the research revealed that words dealing with actions fired up activity in the brain’s motor cortex, the area in charge of the movement of the body. From the research that was done it becomes clear that the brain does not perceive language as merely language, but something more…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “The Motive for Metaphor,” Northrop Frye describes levels of the human mind. The first level of the human mind is consciousness and awareness. In this level of the mind you identify the differences objects from yourself. You name objects with nouns. Also on this level you qualify these objects to differentiate them. You describe the nouns with adjectives. The second level of the human mind is social participation. The language of this level are verbs and actions. This level describes your degree of participation in a community or society. The third level of the human mind is imagination. The language of this level is the desire of language. Examples of the desire of language are literacy language, language of math, music, poems…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluating Elizabeth’s metaphors, she described her family through compassion and sensitivity through her descriptive images of them. Through comparison of a spring flower, a wild flower and rock; she describes her sister. She has a never-ending friend shows her feeling of love for her. I could feel the closeness she h=as with her son, and the challenges starting with her daughter. Her metaphors about her family gave me feelings of happiness, love and appreciation. Her metaphors show emotion of a difficult time in her life with her sister being a support bra-bringing the family closer in a time of need. Elizabeth’s perception is what she has chosen to see in her life with her family. Her personal barriers are with her job where she tends to have death on her mind with dealing with it every day of job. Language uses points of comparism about mechanics of the world she loves; feelings are compassionate through the life of her family and job. Elizabeth’s creative thinking involved abstract thoughts of reality…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether we know it or not, we make use of metaphors and the many ways in which they help us make sense of the world. A metaphor is defined as a figure of speech that identifies an object or an idea that is similar to an unrelated thing. The use of metaphors and the language that it portrays helps to create new insight and evidence of the universe. Metaphors not only help classify the culture and diverseness of the natural world, and help interpret the scientific world, but help us set our outlooks on society; however, some may argue metaphors are an impractical use of our language that only complicate things that can instead be stated clearer.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metaphors enliven ordinary language. People get so accustomed to using the same words and phrases over and over, and always in the same ways, that they no longer know what they mean. When a child looks up at the sky and does not know the word “star” he or she is forced to say, “Mommy, look at the lamp in the sky”. Metaphors give maximum meaning with a minimum of words, they create new meanings; they allow you to write about feelings, thoughts, things and experiences freely. “Critical thinking is the ability to be in control of one’s thinking. It includes the ability to consciously examine the elements of one’s reasoning, or that of another, and evaluate that reasoning against universal intellectual standards - clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth, and logic” (Brookfield, 1989).…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metaphor is a rhetorical figures that the reader or listener tries to understand through choosing the terms. Thus, the selection of the words helps to appreciate a good figure that needs a colorful consideration. Also, metaphor is a comparison that is implicit between two different phenomena by using the vocabularies figurative. I. A. Richards says that a metaphor has two parts, namely, tenor and vehicle. Tenor is the complete sense while the vehicle is the tool when he give us his view as : “…..the vehicle is not normally a mere embellishment of a tenor which is otherwise unchanged by it, but ….vehicle and tenor in the cooperation give a meaning of a more varied power than can be ascribed to either.”…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cognitive Linguistics

    • 192971 Words
    • 772 Pages

    Introduction A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics Dirk Geeraerts Chapter 1 Cognitive Grammar Introduction to Concept, Image, and Symbol Ronald W. Langacker Chapter 2 Grammatical construal The relation of…

    • 192971 Words
    • 772 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lackoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.…

    • 5280 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Boers, Frank. Spatial Prepositions and Metaphor / a Cognitive Semantic Journey Along the Up- Down and the Front- Back Dimensions. Narr, 1996. Print. Evans, Vyvyan. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, 2007. Print. Johnson, Mark. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Reason and Imagination. University of Chicago Press, 1987. Print. Kovecses, Zoltan. Metaphor : A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, USA, 2010. Print. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors we Live by. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980. Print. Schrödinger, Erwin. Was Ist Leben? / Die Lebende Zelle Mit Den Augen Des Physikers Betrachtet. Lehnen, 1951. Print. Taylor, John R. "Prepositions: Patterns of Polysemization and Strategies of Disambiguation." The Semantics of Prepositions. Ed. Cornelia Zelinsky-Wibbelt. 1st ed.Mouton de Gruyter, 1993. 151. Print. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, Cornelia (ed). The Semantics of Prepositions / from Mental Processing to Natural Language Processing. Mouton de Gruyter, 1993. Print.…

    • 4787 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brief History of Translation

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In general, since mankind started translation activities, the study of translation has never ceased. Discussions about translation have become so frequent that various translation theories have been formed gradually in Chinese. In this paper, Habermas’s theory of communicative action reinterpreting the concept of the understanding of translation studies, and Translation to indicate this special form of cross-cultural communication in how to effectively interpret metaphor.…

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can Money Bring Happiness

    • 6447 Words
    • 26 Pages

    References: Alexieva, B.. 1997. There must be some system in this madness: Metaphor, polysemy and wordplay in a cognitive linguistic framework. In: Dirk, D.. (Ed.). Traductio: Essays on punning and translation. Manchester: St. Jerome, 137-154.…

    • 6447 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metonomy

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An obvious problem with the standard approach by L & J (also found in the other…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays