Rhetorical Analysis Of The Women's Brain Gould
In the Women’s Brain, Gould tells of the misinformed data of a woman's brain through the use of rhetoric analysis such as detail, bias, logos, ethos, etc. He uses this information to gravitate toward scientist, to show how they mislead the information and need to improve on data. The author uses a judgmental tone when stating bias when he say, “In the most intelligent races, as among the Parisian,” when he is of such race. Gould begins with a conclusion instead of a hypothesis as if he is trying to prove what is already known. When doing this he only utilized data that supports his opinion. Gould tries to prove his theory using references like, Paul Broca and other scientist, which adds to his credibility so his work seem more reliable.
…show more content…
He states “women, black and poor people suffered from the same disparagement”, stating people like this don’t have the ability to ingest knowledge through the inability to gain access to education. Data points that women aren’t nearly as smart as an gorilla. Broca continues to state that men are just natural at being intelligent and women were program to be wife and doing work unable to gather information and process it.
Le Bon simply just stated that men were more inferior than women and women can't be included in anything. This seemed to be one of the most vicious attacks on women, get had gave a sudden motivation for women to prove him wrong.
Gould show us how we shouldn’t trust science or even scientist, to give us the whole truth. He also prove how people opinion can change over time. Broca was heavily influence and prejudice making it difficult for anyone to take part in his experiments.
The essay itself is an allegory between evolution and creationism. He questions if women evolved into who they are, because of their lack of education in the past or if they was simply created by god to become this to keep from work.
When reading this essay, the reader will feel as if they shouldn’t be categorized into one category because everyone is alike, they may share similar characteristics but aren't the
He states “women, black and poor people suffered from the same disparagement”, stating people like this don’t have the ability to ingest knowledge through the inability to gain access to education. Data points that women aren’t nearly as smart as an gorilla. Broca continues to state that men are just natural at being intelligent and women were program to be wife and doing work unable to gather information and process it.
Le Bon simply just stated that men were more inferior than women and women can't be included in anything. This seemed to be one of the most vicious attacks on women, get had gave a sudden motivation for women to prove him wrong.
Gould show us how we shouldn’t trust science or even scientist, to give us the whole truth. He also prove how people opinion can change over time. Broca was heavily influence and prejudice making it difficult for anyone to take part in his experiments.
The essay itself is an allegory between evolution and creationism. He questions if women evolved into who they are, because of their lack of education in the past or if they was simply created by god to become this to keep from work.
When reading this essay, the reader will feel as if they shouldn’t be categorized into one category because everyone is alike, they may share similar characteristics but aren't the