The speaker’s effective use of pathos is more likely to persuade their audience than the writer. The speech appeals directly to the audience's emotions by emphasizing how reality television influences societal behavior, specifically how series like Survivor and The Bachelor encourage unethical behavior such as lying, manipulation, and sabotage (Kassal 2:56-3:03). This emotionally charged argument appeals to the audience's concerns about moral degeneration, forcing contemplation on how such shows can affect society. By providing realistic examples such as individuals lying and sabotaging each other for personal gain, the speaker raises concerns about how viewers, particularly young or impressionable ones, can emulate similar behaviors. In contrast, Jane Coaston's article, while scholarly, lacks emotional appeal. Coaston explores the function of sports as escapism in times of crisis, such as the conflict in Ukraine, but her approach is more analytical and introspective. While the argument is intellectually sound, it lacks the emotional immediacy of Kassal’s speech, making it less likely to affect the intended audience
The speaker’s effective use of pathos is more likely to persuade their audience than the writer. The speech appeals directly to the audience's emotions by emphasizing how reality television influences societal behavior, specifically how series like Survivor and The Bachelor encourage unethical behavior such as lying, manipulation, and sabotage (Kassal 2:56-3:03). This emotionally charged argument appeals to the audience's concerns about moral degeneration, forcing contemplation on how such shows can affect society. By providing realistic examples such as individuals lying and sabotaging each other for personal gain, the speaker raises concerns about how viewers, particularly young or impressionable ones, can emulate similar behaviors. In contrast, Jane Coaston's article, while scholarly, lacks emotional appeal. Coaston explores the function of sports as escapism in times of crisis, such as the conflict in Ukraine, but her approach is more analytical and introspective. While the argument is intellectually sound, it lacks the emotional immediacy of Kassal’s speech, making it less likely to affect the intended audience