Preview

Richard Dawkins and His Genocide of Faith

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard Dawkins and His Genocide of Faith
Richard Dawkins and His Genocide of Faith The prominent evolutionist Richard Dawkins has emerged as the leading spokesperson for the point of view that a belief in evolution demands atheism. Dawkins is a brilliant author and speaker. He teaches at Oxford University and in 2006 published a book titled The God Delusion, where Dawkins argues that a God most certainly does not exist and so therefore faith, qualifies as a delusion. In 1996 Dawkins was named "Humanist of The Year" and in his acceptance speech, (which was later published in The Humanist) Dawkins called for the eradication of what he regarded as one of the greatest evil of our time. He states that, “It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, ‘mad cow’ disease, and many others, but I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world 's great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. Faith being belief that isn 't based on evidence is the principal vice of any religion” (Dawkins). Then, Dawkins continues in his speech to illustrate what he views as the dangers of faith. He draws many examples from world events, such as the turmoil in the Middle East and Northern Ireland. Dawkins considers these conflicts to be a direct result of the religious beliefs held by these opposing cultures infected with the “brain virus” of faith (Dawkins). I hesitate in taking on an argument against such a respected and accomplished scholar such as Dawkins, however I can’t help disagreeing with his statements. There is so much I think he is missing or at least not addressing. To begin with, I disagree with Dawkins’ idea that faith is evil, because he sees it as a belief that isn’t based on evidence. I would argue that everyone believes some things to be true without evidence. For example, when I was a kid my dad explained to me that the earth was round and it revolved around the sun, and I believed him without any evidence. I still believe him,


Cited: Dawkins, Richard. “Is Science a Religion?” The Humanist. The Humanist, Jan./Feb. 1997. Web. 23 Mar. 2010 Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. United Kingdom: Bantam Books, 2006. Print. McGrath, Alister. The Dawkins Delusion. Downers Grove, IL.:InterVarsity, 2007. Print. McGrath, Alister. Dawkins ' God: Genes, Memes, and The Meaning of Life. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Print. NASA. NASA Science: Astrophysics. NASA, 11 Jan. 2010. Web. 2 Apr. 2010

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “People believe things they have been told to”. Dawkins claimed that it is unrealistic to suggest there is a life after death without any empirical evidence; people have created this false analogy that there is something more out there without much evidence. Seeing as there is no God and no one has seen him clearly suggested to Dawkins that there isn’t one and the religious ideas surrounding life after death are falsifiable. To him the afterlife was that of a “delusion of the next world”. Dawkins was a very intelligent man and to him belief in the afterlife was illogical and implausible. He claimed life was no more than DNA reproducing itself. Are his claims surrounding life after death not realistic when we take empirical evidence in to account?…

    • 2679 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    God and science, as Keller points out later in his book, are not in conflict, showing why many evolutionists are Christians. These insights give Keller’s readers a reason to believe, and through this he helps them realize all the evidence they never knew was right in front of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the first section of Richard Dawkins’s River Out of Eden, mainly in Chapters 1 and 3, Dawkins discusses how evolution, itself, is gradual. “Do good by stealth. A key feature of evolution is its gradualness” (Dawkins 83). Gradualism in evolution is looked at in depth in both Chapter One, entitled The Digital River, and Chapter Three, entitled Do Good by Stealth, where Dawkins elaborates on the topic even further. Dawkins, a man of somewhat argumentative nature, is quick to shoot down false claims made my Creationists in these chapters, where he uses solid evidence in the scientific world in order to support his view of gradual evolution. Even though the topic of evolution is often a touchy subject, Dawkins dives head first…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christopher Hitchens’ New Atheist novel, “God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything” written in 2007, highlights everything that is wrong with religion, and how its effects are detrimental to society. Hitchens critiques Christianity, Judaism, and even Hinduism and Buddhism, for their atrocities and blasphemous beliefs and makes a very valid point as to why many individuals have turned away from religion. Though quite persuasive in some cases, other times the novel makes points that seem weak or trivial in regards to the “evilness” of religion. Each chapter of Hitchens’ book emphasizes a certain wrongdoing religion has committed, or how religion has poisoned society.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unlike Richard Dawkins, Edith Hamilton’s book gives the myths a chance of redemption as the explanations as to why things exist the way they…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Worldviews in Conflict

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stenger, V. J. (2009). The new atheism: Taking a stand for science and reason. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    but does some of his own opinions as well. One of Dawkins views is that when it comes to religion people usually believe what their parents do: what they grew up believing. Many individuals do not look for evidence or justification in their religion, but believe in something because that is all they know. Another one of Dawkins’ views on religion differs from Humes in that Dawkins states that believing in God requires more clarification. Dawkins questions why the existence of the universe has to have a creator, but God does not.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the first chapter of The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins discusses the acceptance of evolution as fact. He says that even with the insurmountable evidence to prove that it is a fact, evolution is still considered to some degree to be just a theory. In a survey of Americans, 40% of people oppose the idea of evolution. They instead believe that humans were created independently from all other living organisms. The percentage is only slightly lower in Britain. He argues that many of those who do not believe evolution to be a fact are uninformed. He states that his purpose for writing this book is to educate these people so that they may realize the truth and change their minds.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “People cited violation of the First Amendment when a New Jersey school teacher asserted that evolution and the Big Bang are not scientific and that Noah’s ark carried dinosaurs. This case is not about the need to separate church and state: it’s about the need to separate ignorant, scientifically illiterate people from the ranks of teachers.” (deGrasse Tyson) Science is based on observations of the natural world, not on the supernatural occurrences that Intelligent Design followers believe. Evolution has been studied and proven by many different sciences including geology, paleontology, genetics, and biology. Scientists in these fields have studied and proven the existence of evolution and its effects on living organisms. Intelligent Design…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Animal

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Looked at another way, though, the figures tell a different story. Since the 18th century, many Western intellectuals have predicted religion’s imminent demise. Yet after a series of withering attacks, most recently by the new atheists, including Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and the late Christopher Hitchens, still in Britain three in four people, and in America four in five, declare allegiance to a religious faith. That, in an age of science, is what is truly surprising.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays