Preview

Richard the Iii: Shakespeare’s Frankenstein or History’s Victim

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard the Iii: Shakespeare’s Frankenstein or History’s Victim
Richard the III: Shakespeare’s Frankenstein or History’s victim

By: Joshua Mastin

Shakespeare, English 233
Dr. Malkiel Choseed
5/17/12

Joshua Mastin Dr. Malkiel Choseed English 233 May 17, 2012

Richard the III: Shakespeare’s Frankenstein or History’s victim

We’ve all heard this famous quote before “History is written by the victors” (Winston Churchill). These words are no truer than in Shakespeare’s play Richard III. In Shakespeare’s rendition he has created a character of such evil in the form of Richard III. Richard’s first line in the play is, “I am determined to prove a villain” (Act 1, scene 1) shows Shakespeare’s intent to put Richard III in a negative light. “If asked of an average person to describe King Richard III, most would probably come up with a picture straight out of Shakespeare” (RichardIII.com) . Paul Murray Kendall wrote, ‘While the Tudor chroniclers made up the minds of subsequent historians about Richard III, Shakespeare has made up the imagination of everybody else” (Richard III.com). Richard III is portrayed as a "deformed hunchback" who ruthlessly lies, murders, and manipulates his way to throne. So the question is was Richard III a monster or was this a ploy by Shakespeare to kiss up to the higher elites such as Queen Elizabeth I, who was a Tudor and the granddaughter of Richard's replacement, King Henry VII.

The Real Richard III

Richard was born on 2 October 1452 at Fotheringay Castle in Northamptonshire (Wikipedia). His father was Richard Plantagenet, Duke of York and his mother Cecily Neville. Richard had a claim to the English throne through both parents (Kendall p.g. 15). In the play Shakespeare never mentioned this part of Richard’s III life. According to BBC.com, Richards’s father conflict with Henry VI was a major cause of the Wars of the Roses, which dominated Richard's early life. His father and older brother died at the Battle of Wakefield in 1460. In 1461, Richard's brother, Edward, became Edward

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard tried to end the war of the roses and placate the Lancastrians by honouring Henry VI through a ceremonious reburial, and by trying to build bridges with the Woodvilles by persuading Elizabeth out of protective sanctuary and to attend court whilst paying her an annuity (Elizabeth was born into a Lancastrian family and did marry a minor Lancastrian noble before marrying the Yorkist king). He tried to end the war of the roses because they were unpopular with the kingdom and the nobles. This is a clear demonstration of how he could have been a great king. This is because he is trying to win over defected supporters and gain trust, popularity and an affinity with as many people as possible. It also shows how he tried to gain affinity with the nobility by gaining trust and showing respect to the Lancastrian history.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s “Richard III” exists as a providential narrative in support of the Tudor Myth; that it was only through the divinely sanctioned rule of Henry VII that brought about peace after an era of turmoil under the reign of Richard III. As such, Shakespeare’s pro-Tudor bias highlights the politically and morally absolutist agenda of his time.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Henry IV part 1, Shakespeare reflects both sides of Prince Harry, and his reformation that guide him to be a great King. In the beginning King Henry states; “When honor speaks, it speaks about Hotspur. I can only see my own son, Harry, and his reputation for wildness and dishonor.” Harry is known as a disgrace, his days consist in being a thief and not behaving as an honorable prince. He accepts himself as a disaster; and no one thinks that his capacity and attitude can lead him to be a great man with a clever plan. By the middle of the play he exposes his great secret; “I’ll be so wild, I’ll make wildness an art form, then redeem myself when the world least expects me to.” His elaborate plans consist in exhibiting the worst…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard, Duke of Gloucester always detested his brother Edward IV after his secret marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, as he was made to look a fool by him when he found out they was married. Furthermore, when society found out of this marriage, this almost put Gloucester at an advantage because in that century, the King was supposed to marry a person that would influence the Kingdom in a good way, not out of love. Nevertheless, Because of this, Gloucester revealed that it was rumoured that Edward IV was already married, when he was got married to Elizabeth Woodville. For this reason, the marriage was deemed illegitimate, thus making Edward V’s inheritance of the throne illegitimate. This was a very strong move from Gloucester, and ultimately, because of this, he gained the throne, and the power to…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard III grew up with many siblings which included three older brothers. He was the runt of the family, so his chances of gaining power were very low. Into his adult life, each of this brothers were dying one by one until the death of his oldest brother, King Edward IV. Richard loved his brother Edward and looked up to him as a hero…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward IV youngest brother, Richard, duke of Gloucester was powerful by himself due to Edward giving him lands in the north; this gave him power, men and was far away from court and London. Richard’s wife Anne Neville’s family owned large amounts of land and power in the north this passed on to Richard, making him stronger and wealthier. Richard could raise an army from his lands this threatened the Woodville family because Richard had the support of the north. He had no opponents with the north and made his own law. Richard also had the support of many nobles loyal to Edward because he had shown his loyalty through the war of the roses; Richard also showed his dedication to England by capturing Edinburgh from the scots. Richard also developed religious patronage, founding collegiate chapels at middle ham and Bernard castle.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at…

    • 13057 Words
    • 53 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crossbow Persuasive Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no doubt that Richard and Joffrey shared similar personalities: they are both flagitious. In the play Richard III, Richard not only spreads rumors of his own brothers, but also kills them in order to gain more power and obtain the crown. Similarly, Joffrey slaughters every potential threat to his throne, from powerful nobles to innocent civilians. Despite the fact that they are both cruel, their ways of interpreting cruelty are profoundly different. Richard was a subtle, sneaky, deceitful person. In the play, he didn’t simply just stand out and kill people. On the contrary, he manipulated his followers to perform the murders. Consequently, other royalties would never expose his secrets. Joffrey, on the other hand, is a well-known tyrant. He kills people without evidence that they have betrayed the throne. Joffrey and Richard differ in their attitude towards others: while Richard III is shrewd and hides his motives, Joffrey let his emotions overrule his strategic developments. Joffrey’s impulsiveness is a critical factor to his final, though Richard III was able to successfully avoid death thus far in his…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays