Preview

Riggs V. Palmer, 115 N. Y. 506 Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Riggs V. Palmer, 115 N. Y. 506 Summary
c. Positivism was also set into motion after the case was remanded back to the original court so that the House of Lords were able to follow the procedure that was laid out by the governing body.
2. In Riggs v. Palmer, 115 N.Y. 506 (1889), Mrs. Riggs and Mrs. Preston (daughters of the testate) petitioned the civil court to revoke their fathers will. Francis B. Palmer decided that when it was his time to pass he wanted to leave his two daughters a small inheritance and leave the bulk of his estate to his grandson Elmer Palmer (the son of Francis’s late son) to ensure they were taken care of after his death. Elmer feared that his grandfather would change his will before he died and decided to kill his grandfather by poisoning him before any changes
…show more content…
Board of Education of the Highland Local School District v. United States Department of Education is based on the sexual discrimination of Title 9 for the Ohio school district. An eleven-year-old transgender girl wanted the same rights other unaltered females to use the school’s facilities. Jane Doe’s parents sought out mental health professionals and that told them Doe had gender dysphoria (identifying as the opposite gender of birth) and that she should start living as the sex she identified with. Jane was told by her school that she was unable to use the girl’s restroom because she still had the anatomy of a boy. By the next school year, the school was allowing Jane use of the facilities yet when other parents began to complain they put a stop to Jane’s privileges. Jane Doe’s parents filed discrimination charges against the school asking that Title 9 would be changed to include transgender.
a. In the past it was unheard of for anyone to fight for the right of a transgender person, society has changed over time to show that a person can be accepted no matter how they sexually identify. Jane Doe and her parents felt there was a need for the change to maintain Jane Doe’s mental health. Sociological law theory is based upon the communities need for adapting as society has changed and with Jane Doe needing the acceptance of her transgender sex to be protected the case correlates to the
…show more content…
The state of Virginia did not recognize same sex marriages performed in Virginia or other states in the past because same sex marriage was not protected before. On a federal level the government would make this a right for the state to decide if it were in the best interest of the people. In a modern-day society, one can see that it is more socially acceptable to recognize a same sex marriage in the community than it was in the past. Looking back sixty to seventy years in the past same sex marriage was considered a taboo topic therefore this case shows how law and society had to change sociological jurisprudence to keep up with modern day

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Arizona, Arizona Revised Statute section 25-327(B) states: "Unless otherwise agreed in writing or expressly provided in the decree, the obligation to pay future maintenance is terminated on the death of either party or the remarriage of the party receiving maintenance." In the case of Kathy I. Palmer, Petitioner/Appellee, v. Sydney N. Palmer, Respondent/Appellant, Sydney (husband) referenced the above statute when filing for termination of spousal maintenance. The court had to consider whether a specified end date in the Decree took precedence over the general interpretation of the law.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the Crown's case, Mr. Craggs made a movement for a coordinated decision of vindication on the premise that there is no proof Ms. Thompson effectively aim a blameless individual to be associated with having conferred an offense in connection to Mr. Penney's demise. Mr. Craggs presents that throwing doubt on someone else is a fundamental component of the charge…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New York Court of Appeals decision should be upheld in regards to Riggs et al v. Palmer case because one should not be granted inheritance by murdering one’s ancestor. For this reason, the New York Court of Appeals has decided on a naturalistic approach, which has deemed Elmer Palmer guilty for murdering his grandfather, thereby prohibiting Palmer from getting anything from his grandfather’s will. This essentially means that the court argues that judges use their morals in order to determine the outcome of cases. Therefore, rejecting the idea that it is morally acceptable to murder someone in order to personally benefit from their death. As a result, there has been a heated debate between naturalists like Judge Earl who argue that Elmer…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell Case Summary

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Obergefell decision is a landmark case that deals with a much greater debate than just that of the legality of same-sex marriage. The majority opinion of the court ruled in favor of the guaranteed right to marriage in every U.S. state regardless of the sex of the individuals involved. While the advancement of liberal social rights is evident in this opinion, the ruling, perhaps more importantly, confronts the struggle between the dissenting views of the nature of Constitutional revision. Through the Obergefell majority opinion and Scalia’s dissent, we see a profound and necessary debate regarding how to treat our nation’s founding document moving forward.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This case is a landmark in the identification of the rights of homosexuals and homosexual couples. The rights of homosexuals have always been denied and restricted on many accounts, but in recent times have already made the steps to reject DOMA. Since DOMA sates that marriage is an agreement between a man and a women, it gives no innate right to homosexual unions in federal law. By looking at history we can easily define marriage, its evolution in the eyes of state and federal law and prove that…

    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Blumenthal, Karen. Let Me Play: The Story of Title IX : The Law That Changed the Future of Girls in America. New York Atheneum for Young Readers, 2005. Print.…

    • 2483 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dynamic Court Viewpoints

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Though traditionally the courts of the United States have abided by the conditions of the constrained court, the court was being quite instrumental in the advancement of marriage for same sex couples. With the exception of the Supreme court case Bowers v. Hardwick in 1986, there had been a general trend of the courts to serve as important implementers of social change for same sex marriage. Yet, the courts have not been able to figuratively strike the mortal blow to issue. Of the accomplishments won by activists in the court, many had been rulings that simply overturned laws forbidding same sex marriage. In order for there to be true social change, the courts would need rule that not only are same sex marriages legal, they must be held to the same standard of equality as heterosexual marriages. Though activists continue to hope that one day full marriage equality can become a reality, it is important to understand the previous cases that been brought forth in the courts…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2017 one year later under the Trump Administration, the guideline reversed and now leaves educations unsure about transgender student’s rights under the law (“Title IX,”2018). Though Title IX may have had some pros and cons throughout the years, overall it had made a great and positive impact on society as a…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving V. Virginia

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia tells me in this case that the Constitution of the United States then were unfair and unjust to the Loving Family. Here we have two people of different race, obviously in love and married. Although the state of Virginia had its own objective concerning interracial marriages, I feel that our Constitution should have enforced what laws were emplaced within The Constitution of the United States. That’s why they were written to protect and to keep good law and order.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Getting married to the same gender was illegal during the 1950s. People believed that homosexuality was a mental disease that “a cure could be found through psychoanalytic treatment.” (Homosexuality in the 1950s) “Since the 1960s, however,and especially since the Bowers decision in 1986, official and popular attitudes toward homosexuals have changed. ”(The Historian's’ Case Against Gay Discrimination)…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two cases before the United States Supreme Court challenge both Congress’s traditional definition of marriage in DOMA and California’s traditional definition in its Proposition 8. The central question before the court in each…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays