Preview

Right to Counsel

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Counsel
Right to Counsel

CJA/364

Right to Counsel

Having a Right to counsel is a privilege that should be an option to any citizen that has committed and arrested for a crime that they may or may not have committed. The Right to Counsel comes from the last part of the sixth amendment that states “to have the assistance of counsel for his defense”. In this essay the development of the right to counsel, when the right to council attaches to criminal procedures, the right to self-representation, and the role of an attorney as it is applied to the right to council will be discussed. Right to Counsel Historically, the right to counsel had meant that there was a right to have a retained counsel. This means that if a defendant could afford an attorney then they had a right to one, however, a poor defendant did not have this right ("Civics Library", 2006). The right to counsel had started in 1932 in the Supreme Court and had later been applied to the sixth amendment ("Right to Counsel", 2013). In 1932 a case consisting of Powell v. Alabama, the courts found that under certain types of circumstances that free counsel had to be provided to criminal defendants. The main topic of this case was that the defendant’s due process rights’ were violated because there was a denial of the right to counsel to the defendants (Zalman, 2011). Right to Counsel Attachments At a pretrial hearing, counsel is required if a lawyer plays a significant part of the case. If the arraignment is a simple case where there are no major decisions to be made then no attorney needs to represent the defendant (Zalman, 2011). If an accused person is questioned by the police then the right to counsel then becomes attached to help protect the accused’s rights against self-incrimination. The Fifth Amendment attaches the right to counsel when an investigation becomes accusatory and focus on a specific person. When a defendant becomes charged with



References: Civics Library. (2006). Retrieved from http://members.mobar.org/civics/CounselAssist.htm Right to Counsel. (2013). Retrieved from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/right+to+counsel Zalman, M. (2011). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Escobedo V. Illinois set the precedent for the sixth amendment, which is the right to a counsel. It guaranteed that if a person is arrested then they must be informed of their legal rights, which gives them the right to remain silent. When Danny Escobedo was arrested in connection for the shooting of one of his relatives he received an 18-hour interrogation and was later released for not making any self-incriminating statements. Another suspect was later arrested and told police that Escobedo had committed the murder. He was then once again arrested and this time interrogated through the entire night. His attorney had been repeatedly denied permission to talk to his client. Escobedo as well had repeatedly asked to see his lawyer…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A good tip that will help you with your studying is to make use of flash cards. It may sound juvenile but flash cards really do make a big difference when you're studying for a brutal test or exam. The more you have in your studying arsenal, the better you'll do.…

    • 432 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person brought into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, can’t be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law, can’t be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Miranda vs Arizona case Miranda established that the police are required to inform arrested persons that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and that they have the right to an attorney. The case involved a claim by the plaintiff that the state of Arizona, by obtaining a confession from him without having informed him of his right to have a lawyer present, had violated his rights under the Fifth Amendment regarding self incrimination. Miranda was arrested for kidnap and rape and was interrogated for a long period of time. This interrogation resulted in a signed confession. At court Miranda lawyer argued that the confession was obtained from a person who does not understand their rights. The court agreed that a person should be informed of their rights and understand them before the police…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    attorney-client privelge

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the United States criminal juctice system truth seeking ought to take presidence over attorney client privielege.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the American Criminal Justice System, a person accused of a crime has the right to be represented by an attorney to advise them and represent them in a court. Attorneys must meet with clients and get information from the client to help form a strong defense strategy for their case. Attorney and their clients have what is known as attorney-client privilege, which allows attorneys to keep conversations between and information gain from their clients confidential except in the formation of the defense’s case. Privilege is essential for communication, trust and confidentiality.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the Supreme Court, case Miranda v. Arizona involved an individual by the name of Ernesto Miranda and the state of Arizona. Ernesto Miranda who was accused of kidnapping and raping women was arrested by police and questioned for about two hours until policed obtain a written statement confession to the crimes (Miranda v. Arizona). In trial, the police officers admitted they did not notifying Miranda of his right to have an attorney present when being questioned about the chargers; however, Miranda was convicted by the Arizona state court and sentenced to prison. Miranda’s attorney appealed the conviction to the Supreme Court of Arizona, but the court upheld the state’s decision stating that “Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel” (Miranda v. Arizona).…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They advise the clients of their rights, explains what can happen for each step of the criminal procedure and help ensure their client’s rights are not violated. The defense attorney must be knowledgeable and competent through all phases while failure in this can have disastrous consequences for the attorney and the defendant. The attorney will help with plea bargains arrangements, decide what is going to be the best course of action to defend the charges or help negotiate a guilty plea punishment. The defense attorney’s position does not end with the completion of the criminal trial. They will also be needed for the trial’s punishment phase, and any appeals process or parole hearings. The attorney must be able to develop a meaningful relationship with the client in order to provide the proper defense counsel. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the “effective assistance of counsel” for criminal defendants.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case had to do with an Ernest Miranda who raped a Patty McGee*. After extracting a written confession from the rapist about the situation, Miranda's lawyer argued that it was not valid since the Phoenix Police Department failed to read Miranda his rights, also in violation of the Sixth Amendment which is the right to counsel. Some factors that helped support Miranda's arguments were that the suspect had requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with a lawyer; the suspect had not been effectively warned about his right to remain silent; and an incriminating statement must have been given by the suspect. The author of the Arizona court's decision, former U.S. Senator and Arizona governor Ernest W. McFarland, said that Miranda had not requested a lawyer at the time of his detention and therefore was not entitled to the protections offered by such thins as in the Escobedo vs. Illinois case.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Davenport, Anniken (2009). _Basic Criminal Law - The Constitution, Procedure, and Crimes._ Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Publishing…

    • 1223 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stuckey, G., Roberson, C., & Wallace, H., (2006). Procedures in the Justice System (8th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays