February 26, 2012
POS-301
Grand Canyon University
Professor Amanda Froes
RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Eric Gaspard The Bill of Rights is composed of the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Amendments can become a part of the Constitution by one of two ways. These are spelled out in Article V of the Constitution. To propose an Amendment both the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives must approve the proposal by a two-thirds supermajority vote. An Amendment can be ratified by a three-fourth states legislature approval or through ratifying conventions in which three-fourths of the states approve it.
These first ten amendments simultaneously became part of the Constitution in 1789 when they were ratified by the existing states of the Union. As a result every American is endowed with these rights that the Federal government is obligated to protect.
• The First Amendment provides for the rights of freedom of speech, press, peaceful assembly, and freedom of religion as well as the right to petition.
• The Second Amendment guarantees citizens the right to bear arms; which means that citizens have the right o weapons and guns in their homes with certain provisions.
• The Third Amendment prohibits the government from forcibly housing militia or soldiers in a person’s house without their permission.
• The Fourth Amendment protects citizens form search and seizure of property without a warrant.
• The Fifth Amendment prevents any person from double jeopardy (being tried twice for the same offense), as well protecting any person from self-incrimination.
• The Sixth and Seventh Amendments guarantees that any person charged with a crime will receive the right to a trial by a jury of peers and to have legal representation.
• The Eighth Amendment protects against unreasonable or excessive fines as well as protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
• The Ninth Amendment reads that have rights other than Rights mentioned in the Bill of Rights that are also protected under the Constitution.
• The Tenth Amendment states that any power that is not given to the Federal government by the Constitution is the power of the state or the people (Patterson, T., 2011pgs. 87-115).
As I ponder the value of all of the Amendments is cannot help but think of the First Amendment; in particular the freedom of religion and how it has shaped my views on religion and tolerance or should I say acceptance of different religious views. When my parents married they took their vows of matrimony as Catholics. My parents had every intention of providing a spiritual life for us within the Catholic faith and all of its traditions.
My mother had become disillusioned with Catholicism and what it had to offer spiritually. As she began to search for spiritual fulfillment she was introduced to the word and religious teachings of Jehovah Witnesses. After several months of studying my mother was baptized as a Witness. My father being wrapped in tradition was threatened by the decision that my mother had made and was determined to do everything within his power to deter my mother from remaining a Witness. Reading the Bill of Rights sheds new light on the situation that my mother was placed under. Although she was married to my father, my mother had every right to seek happiness as a Witness and practice her faith without fear of physical harm. These rights are protected under the Constitution of the United States and my father was therefore violating these rights.
Included in these rights are the freedom, to speech and every time my father tried to stop my mother from going to Ministry ( the term used for knocking on the doors of individuals and sharing the word of God) or going to Assembly (a gathering of congregation members to share the teachings of Jehovah).
Notably there are several instances when these same violations of the first Amendment rights came under fire for Witnesses throughout their history in the United States. The legal clashes with Jehovah’s Witnesses had with government authorities over their proselytizing and practices led to twenty three separate Supreme Court rulings from 1938-46 (Mauro, 2000).
The West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) was one such case. The case was a tremendous victory for Jehovah’s Witnesses, under the protection of the Freedom Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Witnesses were fighting for the right not to salute the flag recite the Pledge of Allegiance in school. In their religion this is equivalent to bearing witness to false witness of allegiance to symbols. Their sole allegiance is to Jehovah and to Pledge Allegiance to the flag or any other political or government symbol would be a sin (Mauro, 2000).
Several years later, after all of the children of our household had gone to forge lives and roots of our own my parents came to an understanding. My father eventually respected my mother’s wishes and stopped interfering with right to exercise and practice religion as a Jehovah’s Witness. In 2008 my father passes away due to complication arising from the care that he received for reconstructive back surgery. We miss him every day.
On Wednesday February 29th my mother is going to have surgery to replace a diseased hip from arthritis. Several weeks ago I received a letter from my mother in the mail. In the letter was a NO BLOOD form that I have to have with me in case there are complications. I find that I am revisiting a reoccurring them in defense of mothers first Amendment rights; this time it is in regards to her right to privacy and quality of professional healthcare. When it comes to blood, Witnesses are requesting that their religious beliefs be upheld and honored. Surgeons are asked to manage any surgical or medical problem in harmony with the patient’s choice their moral and religious decision to abstain from blood (Dixon, 1988).
While it my sincere wish that my mother come the surgery without any complications I understand and value her decision to live life and if necessary die for her moral and religious convictions. I love my mother and all that she has taught me. In my hands will rest the power to ensure that her rights and wishes are honored and protected and I will ensure that her rights are protected and her religious freedoms are guaranteed. References
Dixon, J.L., M.D. 1988
Blood: Whose Choice and Whose Conscience
New York State Journal of Medicine, 1988, 88: 463-464
Mauro, T. 2000
Thank Jehovah Witnesses for Speech Freedoms,
USA Today, May 30, 2000
URL: http://cgi.usatoday.com/usatonline/20000530/2310079s.htm
Retrieved February 26, 2012 from http://www.adherents.com/largecom/jw_freedom.html Patterson, T. E. (2009).
The American democracy (9th ed.).
New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN-13: 9780077237912
References: Dixon, J.L., M.D. 1988 Blood: Whose Choice and Whose Conscience New York State Journal of Medicine, 1988, 88: 463-464 Mauro, T Thank Jehovah Witnesses for Speech Freedoms, USA Today, May 30, 2000 URL: http://cgi.usatoday.com/usatonline/20000530/2310079s.htm Retrieved February 26, 2012 from
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence" ("The 6th amendment,"). There are seven protections provided from the Sixth Amendment. They are the right to a speedy trial, the right to a public trial, the right to be judged by an impartial jury, the right to be notified of the nature and circumstances of the alleged crime, the right to confront witnesses who will testify against the accused,…
- 1203 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The amendment guarantees a “speedy and public” trial with a jury. Defendants are also given the right to be represented by a lawyer, question witnesses, and know if charges are being made against them.…
- 376 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The new constitution had to be ratified by at least nine of the thirteen colonies. Since a lot of states thought that the new constitution gave too much power to the federal government this was not an easy process. James Madison the author of the Bill of Right played a big role in this process. The main reason for ratifying the constitution was to keep all of the central power from going to the federal government. They ended up ratifying the bill of right on December 15, 1791. https://www.aclu.org/other/bill-rights-brief-history This website is where i found this information.…
- 437 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Set out rules for indictment by grand jury and eminent domain, protects the right to due process, and prohibits self-incrimination and double jeopardy. This means that the officer does not determine innocence or guilt. She or he only determines probable cause of belief of guilt. Also, an officer cannot force a person to bear witness against himself. If a person is tried and a verdict is given, that person cannot be tried again. Accused persons cannot be forced to say anything. Eminent domain is the power of a government to take private property for public use, usually with compensation paid to the owner.…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Over time, a few things have been added to the Constitution through some form of interpretation. The important changes made are that we cherish and still abide by today are called amendments, which are unalienable rights that are given to the people. By listing these rights, they forever remain ours, and it is illegal for the government to violate those rights. As of 2006, there are 27 amendments to the Constitution. Not all of them have to do with rights, but many of them do. The first ten amendments, in particular, have the special name; known as the Bill of Rights.…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
On September 25, 1789, the First Congress of the United States therefore proposed to the state legislatures 12 amendments to the Constitution that met arguments most frequently advanced against it. The first two proposed amendments, which concerned the number of constituents for each Representative and the compensation of Congressmen, were not ratified. Articles 3 to 12, however, ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, constitute the first 10 amendments of the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights.…
- 968 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Each of the first ten Amendments are important for every American citizen to have. Americans wanted to have a written set of laws that grants and describes their rights. This needed to be added to the Constitution because it set up the government and American’s rights should be acknowledged and part of the government. There will be less conflict among the American people when they know what their rights are and know that they cannot be taken away.…
- 774 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right…
- 1223 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Second Amendment states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."…
- 770 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The amendments were introduced by James Madison to the 1st United States Congress as a series of legislative articles. They were adopted by the House of Representatives on August 21, 1789, formally proposed by joint resolution of Congress on September 25, 1789, and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments on December 15, 1791, through the process of ratification by three-fourths of the states. While twelve amendments were proposed by Congress, only ten were originally ratified by the states. Of the remaining two, one was adopted 203 years later as the Twenty-seventh Amendment, and the other technically remains pending before the states.…
- 861 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Second Amendment text states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (Jefferson)” The argument over the second amendment is basic and complex at the same time. Most of the controversy is over the vagueness of the terms…
- 2680 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The 6th Amendment focuses completely on the rights of a person accused of committing a crime by the government. The 6th Amendment contains seven specific protections for people accused of crimes. These seven rights are: the right to a speedy trial, the right to a public trial, the right to be judged by an impartial jury, the right to be notified of the nature and circumstances of the alleged crime, the right to confront witnesses who will testify against the accused, the right to find witnesses who will speak in favor of the accused, and, the right to have a lawyer. The reasoning behind all of these protections goes back to the days of our founding fathers; when under the English law none of these rights were guaranteed. The writers of the constitution felt it was very important that all of the rights that are given under the sixth amendment were guaranteed in reaction to the blatant suppression of individual rights and liberties that were being implemented in the “colonies”. As time has passed and our constitution amended in reaction to those times, the rights guaranteed under the 6th Amendment have been strengthened and justly implemented.…
- 2928 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
• With this being said, the government cannot take our personal property without a warrant based on probable cause, and also police cannot enter our homes without a warrant. 5th Amendment • The 5th Amendment protects people from being held for committing a crime unless they are properly indicted. • You may not be tried twice for the same crime. • You don’t have to testify against yourself in court.…
- 353 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the free people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…
- 1505 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The Second Amendment reads, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment is referring to the protection of bands of soldiers who own guns; it isn’t talking about regular people. All of the law articles about the Second Amendment from 1888 to 1959 claimed that an individual right was not guaranteed.…
- 708 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays