Riverside Vs Maclaughlin Case Study
Title and Citation: County of Riverside v McGlaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991)
Type of Action: This Criminal case in which the Maclaughlin claimed that his Fourth Amendment was violated due to the 48 hours arraignment for Probable cause.
Facts of Case: Offender MacLaughlin started a legal claim, affirming that the County's routine of consolidating arraignment with a determination of reasonable justification for individuals subject to warrantless arrest was not adequately provoke under the Fourth Amendment. By and large, arraignments must be held inside forty-eight hours of arrest. Notwithstanding, weekends and holidays were excluded as days. However, an individuals who was arrested on a Friday could spend up to a week in jail before arraignment
Type of Action: This Criminal case in which the Maclaughlin claimed that his Fourth Amendment was violated due to the 48 hours arraignment for Probable cause.
Facts of Case: Offender MacLaughlin started a legal claim, affirming that the County's routine of consolidating arraignment with a determination of reasonable justification for individuals subject to warrantless arrest was not adequately provoke under the Fourth Amendment. By and large, arraignments must be held inside forty-eight hours of arrest. Notwithstanding, weekends and holidays were excluded as days. However, an individuals who was arrested on a Friday could spend up to a week in jail before arraignment