Rogers Vs American Airlines Essay
Cultural Perspective and Conflict Perspective on Rogers Vs. American Airlines In the case of Rogers Vs. American Airlines, Plaintiff Rogers, who was employee of American Airline, sued the airline and challenged the its rule of prohibiting employees in certain categories of employment from wearing an all-braided hairstyle. Two different approaches of sociology of law, cultural perspective and conflict perspective, give different explanations on Rogers case. Cultural perspective considers law as reflection of social cultural beliefs; therefore, it would propose that Rogers should act according to commonly accepted social norms and change her hairstyle. However, conflict perspective sees law as a tool of oppression, and thinks law defends dominant
…show more content…
Based on the key tenets of conflict perspective, conflict perspective would view Rogers case as conflict between dominant group, American Airline, and subordinate group, Renee Rogers; and the law, in this case, was used as a tool to support the power of American Airline to dominate over its employee, Rogers. As for views from economic determinism, law helped ensure that the capitalist class can do what it thinks can enlarge its revenue, as it forced its employees to have a professional, neat looks in order to please its consumers and, eventually, to attain more revenues. In this case, law oppressed Rogers’s rights to control her appearance and freedom to express herself; and employer, as the ruling class, used law as a weapon to exploit Rogers for its own economic interests. Moreover, as for the explanations from hegemony theory, law imposed the justification of American Airline’s policies onto Rogers and other employees who sought not to have uniform appearances, which defended the power of dominant class. In this case, law was an ideological device that serves to change Rogers’s understanding of how her hairstyle correlated to her performance on the job. In short, the inequality and dominate-subordinate relation between American Airline and Rogers caused the conflict between them. And, law tends to resolve the conflict by oppressing
Based on the key tenets of conflict perspective, conflict perspective would view Rogers case as conflict between dominant group, American Airline, and subordinate group, Renee Rogers; and the law, in this case, was used as a tool to support the power of American Airline to dominate over its employee, Rogers. As for views from economic determinism, law helped ensure that the capitalist class can do what it thinks can enlarge its revenue, as it forced its employees to have a professional, neat looks in order to please its consumers and, eventually, to attain more revenues. In this case, law oppressed Rogers’s rights to control her appearance and freedom to express herself; and employer, as the ruling class, used law as a weapon to exploit Rogers for its own economic interests. Moreover, as for the explanations from hegemony theory, law imposed the justification of American Airline’s policies onto Rogers and other employees who sought not to have uniform appearances, which defended the power of dominant class. In this case, law was an ideological device that serves to change Rogers’s understanding of how her hairstyle correlated to her performance on the job. In short, the inequality and dominate-subordinate relation between American Airline and Rogers caused the conflict between them. And, law tends to resolve the conflict by oppressing