According to legend, Rome was founded in 752 B.C. when Romulus ascended the throne as the first king. Unlike many monarchs, Roman kings could not pass down their crown to a relative. New kings were selected by the community leaders called patres and then had to be approved by the populous, the Roman soldiers who made up the Curiate Assembly. The patres also served as advisors to the king, helping him govern, and formed the group known as the Senate. The King had many duties, including commanding the army, handling foreign affairs, issuing laws, and serving as the High Priest. While he had ultimate power, he typically sought approval for his actions from the assemblies. This system lasted for about 200 years, ending when Tarquin the Proud, a cruel tyrant, was overthrown in 509 B.C.
With the end of the monarchy, the Romans created the Republic. The Senate took over and worked to create a government that would prevent a single person from becoming too powerful. They initially selected two leaders, called consuls, who would serve for a term of one year and would share power equally, with veto power over each other. Their most important job was to control the army. They could act as judges and they oversaw the activities of other Roman officials. The Senate was comprised of the patres, or nobles, selected by the consuls, and they served for life. Their primary duty was to advise the consuls and the assemblies on important matters. They made choices involving foreign affairs and could approve or disapprove laws made by the assembly. There were anywhere from 100 to 1,000 members in the Senate, although the optimum number was around 300. The Curiate Assembly also played a key role in the new Republic, responsible for electing many top government officials, making key decisions, and passing laws. The ordinary citizens of Rome, the Plebians or Plebs, also formed an Assembly and elected tribunes to represent them. The Assembly had limited power and could be overridden by the Senate, although it played a significant role in Roman government. All the male citizens of Rome were the part of the Assembly. Some of its members were rich, like merchants and tradesmen, and they eventually were allowed to be voted in to the position of consul. The Assembly could declare war or peace but couldn’t control what was done with the army. They also elected government officials, including the consuls and judges, debated important issues, and voted on laws suggested by Roman officials. Some Plebs were successful orators, like Cicero, who were skilled in getting their opinions across, which was important because Romans loved a good speech and accomplished speakers could often sway public opinion. The laws that were passed were supposed to be followed by everyone from the consuls to the poorest beggar. The laws were harsh but fair and didn’t protect just the rich. Similarly, the judicial system was just; a person wasn’t considered guilty until convicted in a court of law. The Republic lasted for over 400 years. Then, in the first century A.D., a civil war erupted and Caesar emerged as the self-proclaimed dictator. Although the Senate arranged for his assassination, this marked the end of the republic form of government.
To restore order after Caesar’s death, Rome needed a strong, commanding leader. In response, the Senate gave Caesar’s stepson Octavian (later named Augustus) control and he quickly took over the government and began to rule as an emperor. The Senate was able to retain some power, advising the emperor, but was never able to regain its previous influence. Elected magistrates and the assemblies lost a great deal of control and played a much lesser role in the government. The emperor’s appointed officials took over the major roles of running the government and directing the affairs of the empire. The Roman Empire was divided into provinces controlled by governors who reported back to the emperor. The governors acted as judges in their territory, they collected the taxes, and put down rebellions. Many emperors were just and fair, but others were cruel and demanding and used their power badly. Unlike the earlier monarchs, the position of emperor often passed down to relatives, creating dynasties. At the end of the empire, the emperors were very weak which is what led to the fall of the Roman Empire.
Although Roman government changed over time, much of its structure remained the same, with different groups gaining or losing power with the various changes. The concept of a Republic, which began during the monarchy and grew and matured during the middle years, provided a model for future generations to use. Even after the rule moved over to emperors, many facets of the Republic government remained. Despite the eventual collapse of the empire, the basic structure established was solid and the problems encountered provided valuable lessons for those wanting to model after the Romans. Indeed, they left us many important gifts that helped shape the United States. The Roman Senate inspired the idea of Congress, but with the members to be elected by the people. The idea of the Consuls evolved into the presidency with the election being every four years. The concept of the referendum came from the Roman practice that when government officials introduced a law, the people voted on it. The principals of the judicial system are the same as the Romans, with laws intended to protect all people. The Founding Fathers looked back at the principles developed by the Romans, expanded them, and, with a few minor changes, converted them to American law. We should be grateful for what the Romans developed because it provided the foundation on which our nation was formed. Indeed, the Roman Republic evolved into the Democratic Republic of the United States of America.
Bibliography
Burgan, Michael. Empire of Ancient Rome. New York: Chelsea House. 2009.
Carr, Karen. “Roman Government.” historyforkids.org. 21 Oct 2011. Kidipede – History for Kids. 16 Feb 2012
“Government Under the Roman Republic.” mrdonn.org. 16 Feb 2012
James, Simon. Ancient Rome. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1990.
MacDonald, Fiona. Ancient Rome. Chicago: Heinemann Library. 2005.
MacDonald, Fiona. 100 Things You Should Know About Ancient Rome. New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc. 2004.
Roberts, Paul C. Ancient Rome. New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc. 2003.
Shuter, Jane. The Ancient Romans. Chicago: Heinemann Library. 2007.
Bibliography: Burgan, Michael. Empire of Ancient Rome. New York: Chelsea House. 2009. MacDonald, Fiona. Ancient Rome. Chicago: Heinemann Library. 2005. Roberts, Paul C. Ancient Rome. New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc. 2003. Shuter, Jane. The Ancient Romans. Chicago: Heinemann Library. 2007.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…
- 1692 Words
- 7 Pages
Best Essays -
In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
until its fall in 1453 CE. This part of the Empire was known as the Byzantine Empire.…
- 524 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Roman Empire used to be a powerful empire, but that soon came to an end. Many problems in the empire weakened it. The three main causes of the fall of Rome were military weakness, foreign invasions, and weak leadership. If these problems never occured, Rome could’ve been the most powerful and successful empire in history.…
- 200 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Have ever wondered why the Roman Empire fell? This fall has been an ongoing process for more than a century. The falling of the Roman Empire was caused by poor military, deadly illnesses, and disaster and destruction.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han and Roman Empires are highly praised with great wealth, inventions, and their success.While both societies saw new technological advancements as necessary, the Han dynasty always sought the most efficient route, the romans prioritized speed and was not very fond of craftsmanship.…
- 440 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
From C.A. 300 CE to 476 CE Rome began a steady decline to its collapse. Some historians disagree with this and have other theories. One of the other theories is that the Roman Empire did not collapse as the Eastern Empire did not collapse until “Fall of Rome at Constantinople in 1453.” The base of this theory is that the Eastern Empire became the Byzantium Empire, however it was no longer the Roman Empire as there were no longer any Roman Emperors. Another theory by Peter Wells is “The Roman Empire “fell” only in the minds of people who had a particular and limited view of what the Roman Empire was and who understood events such as Alaric’s capture of Rome in A.D. 410 as marking its end.” Wells argues that the change was extremely gradual and continued well past 476 CE. While Wells theory is more valid, the empire still did not exist after 476 CE.…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Legends say that Rome was founded by Romulus and Remus to twin brothers . They were left to drown in a basket on the tiber but , they were found by a wolf .After, Romulus killed his brother he became the first king of Rome . Rome ‘s history started with seven kings . The last three kings were Etruscan . They built temples and the first sewers .…
- 203 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…
- 2567 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Roman government changed from a republic to an empire, this doesn’t seem an easy task for modern day governments. How was it that this occurred? And what impact did Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar have on this change? Julius Caesar, although not completely starting the process, this was begun be Sulla, Caesar did draw the power away from the senate and bestowed it upon himself, partaking in constant wars, instead of stabilising the republic. When he died, Rome fell back into civil war and power was regained by Julius Caesar’s heir, Augustus. Augustus continued drawing Rome away from a republic, as was his only option if Rome was to survive. He was almost completely unchallenged once he took power as his opponents were dead from the war. He began rebuilding the nation and restored it to its prior capacity and further. Caesar was the overall catalyst for the reform and Augustus simply continued with that legacy.…
- 2157 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
tried to build a more solid senate but failed to take power away from the…
- 2425 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The representative democracy started in in ancient Athens around 508 BCE and it wasn’t called representative democracy it was called direct democracy. Direct democracy lets the people make decisions and not the representatives. Ancient Rome started it, but the U.S. could be called a representative government because we elect representatives to make laws.…
- 53 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays