Soviet intelligence services went on watchful in 1981 to observe for US preparations for initiating a shocking nuclear hit against the USSR and it allies. This warning was escorted by a new Soviet intelligence collection program, known by the acronym RYAN, to observe signals and provide early warning of US target. Two years later a major war scare exploded in the USSR and this study traces the beginning and capacity of Operation RYAN, its relationship to the war scare and Reagan administration's strategic defense initiative (SDI) heightened Cold War tensions.…
A development that could have been preventable through possible disarmament negotiations after the war, had the US not underestimated the USSR. Considering the aftermath of World War II, the USSR had lost an estimate of 22 million lives and had large decimated areas of land. The US couldn’t possibly see the USSR as a military threat due to the heavy casualties the nation had sustained. In all likeliness, the US may have thought that “nuclear diplomacy” would be enough to quell the USSR if the need arose. A decade later the USSR had displayed its very own jet-bomber called the Mya-4 “Bison”. In 1955, an American air force attache, had observed twice the number of Bisons that were estimated to have been made. This jet-bomber was far more capable of inflicting injury upon the US than the Tu-4, and to further the anxiety of the US, the USSR had detonated its first thermonuclear weapon in…
Communism was slowly building up in the time after the Vietnam War. Soviet Union and the US were splitting up their alliance and most countries were still bouncing back after the recession. Ronald Reagan one the most iconic presidents to sit in the oval office was president at the time. Reagan’s skills got tested from the very start. Few days into his first term there was a huge bombing in Lebanon and just days after that a small Caribbean island started to lose its socialist views and gained communist ones. Reagan believed that dealing with the small island, Grenada, was equal value as dealing with the bombing. Much of the US was tentative on supporting their leader and his military after the US involvement in Vietnam. All faith in the US…
March 23, 1983 under President Ronald Reagan, the Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as Star Wars, was implemented. The SDI was a missile defense system with the intentions to protect the United States from attack by nuclear weapons. This initiative was specifically targeted towards the Soviet Union. The Soviets feared that the new initiative, would further enable the United States to launch their first-strike against them. Although this Initiative seemed to be a well thought out plan, the technology proved to be too complex and much of the research was later cancelled, and the plan…
“What if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest upon the threat of instant U.S. retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that of our allies?” (Address 5). On March 23, 1983, President Ronald Reagan presented his vision of a future with a Nation’s security that did not rest upon the threat of a nuclear retaliation, but on the ability to protect and defend against such attacks. Ronald Reagan broadcasted his idea on upgrading the military's defensive tactics on television. Reagan was giving people hope and safety from a nuclear war. He shared his idea…
At the midst of the Cold War the United States consistently lead the fight with their advanced missile systems, ever evolving Military concepts and operations. This was never more prevalent with the quick evolution with the development of the Nike-Ajax in 1945 and production ceasing in 1958 for the transition to the newer, more powerful all-solid-fuel Nike-Hercules missile. (https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/missile-surface-air-nike-ajax) With the continued threat from The Soviet Union, The United States was unrelenting and persistent with being able to defend and prevent all threats. The United States implemented a policy known as “Mutually Assured Destruction”, with the acronym MAD becoming a widespread metaphor expressing the worst fears of the era. (http://nikemissile.org/ColdWar/whatwehave/) The Ajax’s need for upgrades quickly became the forefront of the National Air Defense.…
In the turn of the 20th century, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States was the most powerful nation; it prospered economically, militarily, and politically. With this increase in power came a great consideration over how the United States would deal with foreign affairs. After the attacks on the World Trade Center the idea of preemptive measures became the highlight of the Bush's National Security…
Leonid Kistersky, (1996), New Dimensions of the International Security System after the Cold War, Centre for International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University.…
If the United States or NATO were to increase that number, the USSR could respond with increasing their arsenal by the same amount. The strategic nuclear forces of the Soviet Union and the United States were changing in character in 1968. The total number of missiles held by the United States had been static since 1967 at 1,054 ICBMs and 656 SLBMs but there was an increasing number of missiles with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) warheads being deployed. MIRVs carried multiple nuclear warheads, often with dummies, to confuse ABM systems, making MIRV defense by ABM systems increasingly difficult and expensive. One clause of the treaty required both countries to limit the number of sites protected by an anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system to two each. The Soviet Union had…
In 1985, the United States and the Soviet Union relations were coming to a new balance of power when the Soviet Union collapsed into independent nation’s beginning early in 1985. After years of Soviet military build-up at the expense of domestic development; economic growth was at a standstill. The United States was flourishing from an economic boast in a growth and strengthening of military power to bring the United States into a new leap in technological advancement over the Soviet’s. In Ronald Reagan’s second inaugural speech, he states in paragraph 30 that “One nation, the Soviet Union, has conducted the greatest military buildup in the history of man, building arsenals of awesome offensive weapons.” In this statement, Ronald Reagan knew that he had to direct the United States’ Military in a direction that would equal or surpass the strength of the Soviet military and any future threat to this nation that would come. The balance of power here between both super powers of the time was to build the military might as much as possible all in only to avoid the use of the last resort of a weapon that would be to come to a nuclear war.…
In its simplest form, deterrence consists of the following threat, intended to dissuade a state from aggression: ‘Do not attack me because if you do, something unacceptably horrible will happen to you.’ In other words, deterrence is a form of persuasion in military strategy. To convey such a threat, the deterrer must decide what constitutes an attack, and must then decide what level of response would be adequate to deter it. This in turn depends on the deterrer’s estimation of the adversary’s intentions and the values it places on them. For deterrence to succeed, the threat must also be credible. Not only must the potential aggressor believe that the costs of an attack would be higher than its benefits, but also that there is a significant likelihood that such costs would indeed be incurred.…
Throughout thousands of years mankind has developed and used different weapons to take out their enemies. Not until the last 100 years though, have these weapons been threats that can kill millions of people in seconds and decimate entire cities. With the development of weapons such as the atomic and hydrogen bombs and chemical and biological warfare, modern warfare has become a destructive force effecting not just one city but whole countries and hundreds of millions of people. With such terrible and destructive power is it possible that in the future weapons many times more dangerous will arise? And the bigger question, who will be in control of such great power and how can we prevent this technology from getting into the hands of others such as terrorist groups? The past has shown what man can do to one another, and the deadly aftermath of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) such as nuclear bombs can pollute an area with radioactive wastes that can last for centuries, such as the bombings of Japan during World War I. All in all weapons of mass destruction have been forceful weapons for those that possess them and a danger for everyone on earth.…
The reliance on SOPs during the Cuban Missile Crisis is an example of poor foreign policy decision making during a time of crisis. With the use of different deception tactics, Soviet missiles were sent to Cuba in secrecy. Upon the arrival in Cuba, the Soviets failed to properly camouflage the missiles, their soldiers, and the barracks stationed in Cuba. The Soviets lack of secrecy and security is due to the bureaucracy adhering to and the misapplication of SOPs. The standard operating procedures for construction of nuclear missile sites failed to include camouflage which would disguise their activities on foreign territory. The Soviets adhered to procedures at their Cuban barracks exactly as they would in the Soviet Union. These are some of the factors that contributed to the United States government's realization that Soviet missiles had been delivered to Cuba by the Soviets.…
The Non Proliferation regime treaty came into force in 1970 after nearly 10 years of negotiations. Its main scope is to prevent the spread of highly dangerous weapons, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and finally to achieve general and complete disarmament. (2003, Bunn).…
Although there have been movements since 1991 to eliminate nuclear weapons from the face of the navy and ground units of nuclear states all around the world, in response to fears both realistic leaders "missing" nuclear weapons in the Soviet Union, the two countries continue to deploy large number of tactical weapons at air bases. As almost all of these weapons are vulnerable to a nuclear attack, they can’t be used for deterrence, and therefore are weapons for the first time use or for use against non-nuclear adversaries. However, because the United States and Russia, still stock incredible amount of nuclear weaponry,…