Her actions resulted in an arrest for civil disobedience, despite her causing no harm to anyone. While her choice to refuse to give up her seat may have seemed like a small action, it sparked the 381-day-long boycott of public busses, ultimately leading to the Supreme Court ruling the segregation of busses as unconstitutional (Rosa Parks and Civil Disobedience). Despite not causing harm to a single person, Rosa Parks’ acts of nonviolent protest indirectly helped put an end to segregation on the public transit system, and helped ignite the civil rights movement in the coming …show more content…
But this is negated by the fact that it is often the governments of countries that create these problems in the first place. In the case of Rosa Parks, it was the government that created segregation. During the women’s march, they were protesting the people that our government had appointed to run this country. In both cases, as well as in many others, the only possible solution to these problems is to make your opposition to the current situation known through