Preview

Sacco And Venzetti Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
603 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sacco And Venzetti Essay
Fiona
Sacco and Venzetti
!

After World War l all the countries that were in the war were going through an

adjustment period to try to get back what they lost in the war. Vladamir Lenin, the
Russian Premier, started Communism in Russia. He loved the idea of Communism and wanted to spread it around the world. Because of this America went through a period called the Red Scare, where Americans feared the spread of Communism to America.
Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Venzetti were two Italian immigrants who were tried and put to death for a double murder and robbery in South Braintree Massachusetts.
Because of the Red Scare and many other factors these men were wrongly accused and put to death.
!

Because of the Red Scare people were paranoid that
…show more content…
Because of the Communist paranoia that had taken over
America Sacco and Venzetti, who were immigrants and anarchists, had very little chance of being granted a fair trial from the start. Normally your political affiliations arenʼt admissible in court, but in this case they became a huge issue. As the trial went on this prejudice carried through until their conviction.
!

Before the trial they tried Venzetti for a previous crime of a failed robbery. This

wasnʼt a conventional method and was rarely done in the Massachusetts courts. He was found guilty of this crime and it was detrimental to the murder case. Not only was he now a previously convicted felon he refused to take the stand to defend himself which was a red flag for everyone. He was sentenced to 10-15 years which was

unreasonably high for a crime in which no one was hurt. This sentencing was a glimpse into the future for the murder case that was coming up. This wound up greatly affecting
Sacco as well as Venzetti because since they were tried together Sacco was kind of penalized for Venzettiʼ previous crime.
!

The six week trial concluded with a guilty verdict for Sacco and Venzetti. The only

evidence they had against the men was the fact that they had guns at the time

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Again the judge and the state did have their reasons, one being the fact that in the…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bartolomeo Vanzetti Case

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The defendants immediately made a series of appeals. The appeals were made on the basis of abysmal testimonies, prejudice against them, and a confession by an alleged participant in the robbery. Celestino Madeiros confessed to participating in the crime with the Joe Morelli gang. However, Judge Thayer denied all the appeals and refused to upset the verdict based on the confession. Because of the publicity that the case had garnered, the governor of Massachusetts, Alvan T. Fuller, created the Lowell Committee to review the case. However, like the trial before, the committee ignored evidence of innocence, and focused only validating the guiltiness of the two men. Sacco and Vanzetti were both executed by electrocution through an electric…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco and vanzetti

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 15, 1920, a paymaster for a shoe company in Braintree, Massachusetts, and his guard were shot to death by two men who escaped with $15,776.51. Witnesses reported that both of these men were Italian’s. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were with two other men while they went to a garage to claim a car that local police connected with the crime. The police then arrested them, due to their being “suspicious characters.” This became one of the most controversial cases in American history.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the American criminal justice system, one of our most sacred principles is that everyone is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in every essential element of the crime. The case of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti is a very important case where the ruling has become very controversial. In this case both Sacco and Vanzetti were found guilty however with the recent expansion of technology it is believed that maybe Vanzetti is innocent after all.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sacco and Vanzetti were victims of the short-lived Red Scare, which was the United States' fear of the growing power of Communists, or Reds. When a factory paymaster was robbed and murdered along with his guard, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested after witnesses described the murderers as being Italian. Sacco was a shoemaker and Vanzetti was a fish peddler. Despite the fact that they had alibis and that there was only circumstantial evidence against them, they were found guilty by the jury and received the most extreme of punishments, death. However, they didn't leave the world silent. Many people protested their execution because of the unfair and prejudice treatment of the two radical, Italian immigrants.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was no way Sacco and Vanzetti could have been proved guilty. People like Sacco and Vanzetti who were radicals or immigrants were called bad people and people could not trust them. People needed Jobs, but people did not want foreigners to take their jobs and also did not want them in their neighborhoods if they could not speak english. The hatred of foreigners grew as time went on. Because of all this, juror’s opinions of Sacco and Vanzetti were changed at the start of the trial. To them, it meant that they were both not good people and were probably guilty. Some witnesses were obviously lying because of propaganda and the information they read from newspapers and their information should not have been listened…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The prosecutor, Frederick G. Katzman, “made irrelevant remarks about the defendants’ unpopular political beliefs and their lack of patriotism” and normally these remarks would be dismissed but “Judge Thayer allowed these remarks to pass”("Sacco and Vanzetti Trial"). Because Sacco and Vanzetti’s beliefs were unpopular this caused a rift with the judge and “some trial observers noted that Thayer was hostile to the defense” and that “he may have been biased in favor of the prosecution.” ("Sacco and Vanzetti Trial"). These conditions caused controversy in the case because of the differing political opinions and if these circumstances caused an innocent man to go to jail there would be an uproar. There was also controversy among the eyewitness accounts that were reported. The “eyewitness reports differed on almost every crucial part of the evidence” from the “gunman’s build, appearances, clothes,” and even down to who fired the shots (“Sacco-Vanzetti Case facts”). These differing accounts could have made the difference in life or death for Sacco and Vanzetti, however, since the judge was biased due to the defendant's’ beliefs these men were…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco and Vanzetti

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It all started with a robbery in South Braintree, Massachusetts, on April 15, 1920. The recent Bolshevik revolution in Russia scared many Americans. There came a case of two Italian immigrants, Sacco and Vanzetti. Who were arrested for an armed robbery in South Braintree, Massachusetts, in which a guard and a paymaster were killed. They were found guilty and sentenced to death in the electric chair. The newly formed American Civil Liberties Union and labor organizations publicized the fact that there was no hard evidence against the two immigrants. The Judge at their trial was openly prejudiced against the Italians. Sacco and Vanzetti admitted to being radicals in their political beliefs but proclaimed their innocence of the crime. The case received worldwide attention. “But what good is the evidence and what good is the argument? They are determined to kill us regardless of evidence, of law, of decency, of everything. If they give us a delay tonight, it will only mean they will kill us next week. Let us…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There was a calendar that was attained by officers on the deceased possession. This evidence was ruled inadmissible by the court, and yet it was still in the jury room for their viewing. The jurors had told the judge, that this calendar was very influential in deciding a guilty verdict. Judge Gerald Lee held a hearing and found the chief prosecutor Steven Mellin of the case has put the calendar in the evidence box that goes to the jury room for them to view. The judge also made clear that his belief was the prosecutor Mellin’s misconduct had been reckless, on purpose and not just a harmless mistake.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phil 235 Term Paper

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages

    was placed on probation because he was unable to pay child support for all nine of his children. During…

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saboteur

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion he went a little over board because innocent people were hurt and even killed. He suffered two days and that doesn’t equal the life of anyone. He should have done the legitimate process through the legal system.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Behavior

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    he did not and still does not carry himself like a criminal. Even though he is prison now for…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Seventy-three percent of those who killed a black person faced no penalty compared to 59 percent of those who killed a white.”2 . The juries on these cases should learn what the law actually means. In Jacksonville, FL, Marissa Alexander was sentenced to 20 years in jail simply for firing a warning shot in to the ceiling of her house. Alexander, who had never been arrested before, has said she fired a bullet at a wall in 2010 to scare off her husband when she felt he was threatening her. No one was hurt, but the judge in the case said he was bound by state law to sentence her to 20 years in prison after she was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Alexander had rejected a plea deal that would have resulted in a three-year prison sentence and chose to go to trial. A jury deliberated 12 minutes before convicting her. After she tried to use the stand your…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    for such hefty penalties is that the law had the potential to be more of a…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sacco-Vanzetti case was an international controversy in the 1920’s (Pernicone). Many people were outraged by the sentence that Sacco and Vanzetti faced. There were many protests worldwide regarding the two Italians. An abundance of people compared the execution of Sacco and Vanzetti to that of John Brown, who was wrongly convicted of treason and murder, or even Jesus Christ. For six years the two were constantly headlining the news worldwide…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics