Preview

salomon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
salomon
Aron Salomon was a successful leather merchant who specialized in manufacturing leather boots. For many years he ran his business as a sole proprietor. By 1892, his sons had become interested in taking part in the business. Salomon decided to incorporate his business as a Limited company, Salomon & Co. Ltd.

At the time the legal requirement for incorporation was that at least seven persons subscribe as members of a company i.e. as shareholders. Mr. Salomon himself was managing director. Mr. Salomon owned 20,001 of the company's 20,007 shares - the remaining six were shared individually between the other six shareholders (wife, daughter and four sons). Mr. Salomon sold his business to the new corporation for almost £39,000, of which £10,000 was a debt to him. He was thus simultaneously the company's principal shareholder and its principal creditor

Read more: Salomon v Salomon & Co is a foundational decision | Law Teacher http://www.lawteacher.net/company-law/essays/salomon-v-salomon-co-foundation-company-law-essay.php#ixzz2h9lnK81u
Follow us: @lawteachernet on Twitter | LawTeacherNet on FacebookHe asked the company to issue a debenture of £10,000 to him. However, a sudden slow down in business occurred and the company could no longer pay interests to Salomon. Even the wife puts money, but the company still cannot pay. Finally, Salomon transfers the debenture to one B, but still the company could not pay. B is here a secured creditor, in relation to the company, as he holds in respect of his a security over property of the company in term of the debenture. B called for a receiver and therefore, sold the easiest part of the company, i.e., the factory to cover his debts. That led to the end of the business. This left the debts of the general creditors, for instance, the general suppliers to be covered. The company had to be hence liquidated and the assets were to be sold to pay them.

When the winding up order was made the official receiver became

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Adm 1300 Individule Case

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages

    3. For the corporation ownership, Derek may need to put amount of money in the business, so that he can hold shares of stock.…

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Taxation Solutions Manual 1

    • 300308 Words
    • 1649 Pages

    as a small business corporation and a subsequent sale of shares would be entitled to the…

    • 300308 Words
    • 1649 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legt 2741 Assignment

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Firstly it must be emphasised that through incorporation J is a separate legal entity from its founder, shareholders and directors as demonstrated in the landmark case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd . Lord Halsbury LC made the judgement that once a company is legally incorporated it must be treated as a separate legal entity. This important legal principle is accounted for in the Corporations Act 2001 s124(1) which states that “a company has the legal capacity and powers of an individual” .…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LOBOFinal Exam 2

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jack, Tom and Mary are executive directors of Photolab Ltd. Jack owns 8% of the shares, Tom 15% and Mary 7%. 15% of the shares are owned by 700 shareholders and the remaining 55% shares are owned by Photoproductions Ltd. Although Tom has never been formally appointed as managing director of the company, he has assumed that role and the other directors allow him to do so. The Board was aware that Tom’s business card described him as the managing director of Photolab Ltd. Often Tom entered into contracts on behalf of the company binding the company up to $1 million dollars without seeking the prior approval of the board. The company, however, always honoured these contracts.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental issue in this case is a matter of the debtor's 1True title to ownership of…

    • 3356 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Case Study

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this case Central Apartments Ltd has borrowed $800,000 from exchange bank and secured the loan by a five year mortgage on the apartment building. Since the bank required additional security the president of the corporation at the time named Ebbers personally signed the guarantee. This makes Ebbers the guarantor and responsible for the debt if the principle debtor, Central Apartments Ltd, should default in the payment of their debt.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Lord Justice Lindley, “By a company is meant association of many person who contribute money or money’s worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company. The persons who contribute it or to whom it belongs are members. The proportion of capital to which each member is entitled is his share.” (Mitra & Sen, 1956, p. 554)…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bsbwor501 Quiz 1

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stockholders invested $70,000 in the business and received shares of common stock as evidence of ownership.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fundamental difference among receivership and different methods for managing an indebted company is that a bank or other type of 'secured' creditor usually picks the receiver. This implies the bank…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lit 1

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages

    for 100% of the debt, and may be sued. The owner’s personal property may be liquidated…

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Salomon v Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 (Salomon). For extended discussion of Salomon, see R Grantham…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    chapter 11 hw - law

    • 765 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3) This is an example of payment on liquidated debt. Because D assumed a new legal detriment – that is, he would not only pay the originally-agreed upon $50,000, but also pay 9% interest on top of that amount – C is legally bound on his promise.…

    • 765 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ockham Technology PAPER

    • 2092 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Raised first round from VCs (Noro-Moseley & Monarch), with each getting one seat on the board…

    • 2092 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There was an issue of mishandling funds in the company. The shareholders were paid by Tyco the amount they were entitled to. Management needed a change. The manager who was handling the financial obligation of the company was either not trained by the company properly, or management was not following the rules set forth by the company to ensure a successful operation. The shareholders were expecting an immediate change be made. Creating an adjustment in management and the policies in management concerning the financial obligations provided the shareholders the acknowledgement of their mistake and an effort to make it better for the future success of both the shareholders and the…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    company law ans

    • 4063 Words
    • 13 Pages

    NOTE: USE THESE SAMPLE ANSWERS AS A REFERENCE ONLY! THESE ANSWERS WILL NOT HELP YOU PASS YOUR EXAM!…

    • 4063 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays