SAMPLE CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
Employee No. 1 is a regular employee for 1 decade for promotion w/at least 1 step higher
Employee No. 2 is a regular employee for only 5 years for promotion w/ at least 1 step higher
Employee No. 3 is a regular employee for more than 1 decade for promotion w/ 2 steps higher
As public servants, these employees were all dedicated, conscientious, hardworking and very efficient at work. However, differences were noted from them individually and that is how they handle work pressure. Although Employee No. 1 is easily stressed and outspoken, she is number 1 in fund generation campaign, a great contributor for the branch target on deposits. Employee No. 2 produces output also. Employee No. 3 is outspoken and easily stressed too, but a great contributor in fund generation campaign of the branch and contributor as well for achieving results of other branch. In short, she’s well rounded. Aside on the difference on length of service they have rendered for the company, their individual work contributions also count.
The three (3) employees were being called by their supervisors on a close door meeting regarding their applications for promotion. Employee No. 1 was informed by the head that her application is not approved. Employee No. 2 was informed of her application for promotion is approved and luckily with two steps upward. Employee No. 3 was informed that her application is also approved but with only one step upward. Such decision made by their supervisors was the starting point of professional rivalries among these employees and even demoralized the affected ones. Positive and negative reactions were received. Verbal dispute as expected had personally affected them. They even confronted each other and ask what was so special about the employee to deserve this 2-step promotion whereas if heads were really that objective, such promotion is deserved by Employee No. 3 or they can equally give promotion for the three contenders, not denying
Employee No. 1 is a regular employee for 1 decade for promotion w/at least 1 step higher
Employee No. 2 is a regular employee for only 5 years for promotion w/ at least 1 step higher
Employee No. 3 is a regular employee for more than 1 decade for promotion w/ 2 steps higher
As public servants, these employees were all dedicated, conscientious, hardworking and very efficient at work. However, differences were noted from them individually and that is how they handle work pressure. Although Employee No. 1 is easily stressed and outspoken, she is number 1 in fund generation campaign, a great contributor for the branch target on deposits. Employee No. 2 produces output also. Employee No. 3 is outspoken and easily stressed too, but a great contributor in fund generation campaign of the branch and contributor as well for achieving results of other branch. In short, she’s well rounded. Aside on the difference on length of service they have rendered for the company, their individual work contributions also count.
The three (3) employees were being called by their supervisors on a close door meeting regarding their applications for promotion. Employee No. 1 was informed by the head that her application is not approved. Employee No. 2 was informed of her application for promotion is approved and luckily with two steps upward. Employee No. 3 was informed that her application is also approved but with only one step upward. Such decision made by their supervisors was the starting point of professional rivalries among these employees and even demoralized the affected ones. Positive and negative reactions were received. Verbal dispute as expected had personally affected them. They even confronted each other and ask what was so special about the employee to deserve this 2-step promotion whereas if heads were really that objective, such promotion is deserved by Employee No. 3 or they can equally give promotion for the three contenders, not denying