Preview

San “Bushmen” vs. Western Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
726 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
San “Bushmen” vs. Western Society
San “Bushmen” VS. Western Society
Teresa Billinger
ANT101: Introduction to Cultural Anthropology
Tristan Marble
May 13, 2013

The San “Bushmen” of the Kalahari Desert live in the Southwest area of Africa in diverse environments with their kinship being of a nuclear family mostly of bilateral descent. There are three behaviors that impact the culture which are affluence, immediate return system, and generalized reciprocity. When compared to Western society culture there are significant differences which shows that kinship does impact behaviors in the lives of Americans.
The kinship of the San is a nuclear family of bilateral descent which can be described as the main type in foraging societies because it is adaptive to the different situations they face. Bilateral descent means the family connections are both from mother and father; which helps with mutual aid, and division amongst the bands. For example, if the San find themselves on hard times they can travel to another area and find kin who will give them water and shelter. Also within the group if one families hunter did not produce meat for the week; because everyone is kin they will still receive meat for their family because the band contributes as a whole and not individuals. That would make this type of kinship capable to withstand the changes that arise within the San territory.
Foragers like the San have been portrayed as starving or struggling for food and water for their families, when they are actually content with what they have. They hunt and gather two or three days and spend the rest of their time relaxing with each other. The foragers has very few belongings, they are part of what is considered the affluent society. In the book Cultural Anthropology Barbara Nowak and Peter Laird (2010) stated: “Affluence means having material items that are in abundance relative to wants and needs.” (Nowak & Laird, 2010) The San do not want more than what they need, so they do not take more than they



References: Nowak, B., & Laird, P. (2010). Band Societies. Retrieved from Constellation Support Site: https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUANT101.10.2/sections/sec3.1 Nowak, B., & Laird, P. (2010). Cultural Anthropology. Retrieved from Constellation Support Site: https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUANT101.10.2/sections/ch00 Nowak, B., & Laird, P. (2010). Economy. Retrieved from Constellation Support Site: https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUANT101.10.2/sections/sec4.2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. Kinship is organized by tents. A husband and wife live in shared tents with usually one to five kids. The tents of the Basseri tribe show social organization in a tribe.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The San is foragers who reside in the Kalahari Desert in Africa. The San people have survived and flourished here for thousands of years. In a foraging culture the people live in mobile groups called Bands (Nowak & Laird, 2010). Typically, they move every few weeks to location were food and water is thriving. In foraging cultures continuous movement and the sharing of food and water are part of what builds kinship ties. These kinship ties build a greater sense of obligation to each other (Nowak & Laird, 2010). I will explore a general reciprocal kinship system between the San people. I will provide three examples of this kinship system to display how it affects the San culture. The kinship system of the San people is not too complicated compared to the western society. When you look at the way the family structure is compiled you can see that is helps strengthen the ties between themselves and neighboring tribes. Everything that they do is help with survival of the family.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How they interacted with their kin was determined by many things, including the person’s gender, age, whether they lived in a patrilineal or matrilineal society, clan membership, family connections, and certain well-known demands and taboos.” Many of the Texan Indian societies operated on kinship principle. One was forbidden to marry in their clan since everyone within that clan was kin. This included cousins, uncles, aunts, grandparents, etc. It was expected of every kin to take care of kin. By this kinship, they could depend on others during time of need. The obligations within this system were very important because to the Indians it meant a difference between “life and death”. A kinsperson duty might be to provide food, shelter and protection, while in some cases, a man might even have to share his wife with his brother and a woman, her husband with her sister. All these obligations had to be done willingly and this system stressed on sharing, family and…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kindship SystemIdentify and describe the kinship system of one of the cultures listed below. These cultures are found in Chapters 3 and 4 of your text. Code to work APH 6Q4YWJP8…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsai and Alanis (2004), suggested that ffamily practices within the Native American culture were as diverse as among the different Asian groups ' family practices and traditions. Yet, despite this enormous diversity, there seems to be common core values and beliefs that characterize traditional Native…

    • 2213 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American kinship greatly differs from its Indian counterpart. While Americans are neolocal, Indians are patrilocal. Indian marriages are commonly arranged, further solidifying the…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bushmen: Want and Item

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I am going to imagine that I am going to live in the Kalahari Desert to live a traditional semi-nomadic life with the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. I am going to discuss the five items that I will take with me and the reason why I want to take these items. Then I will discuss how the semi-nomadic life style affects my sense of home my relationship with my environment and my attitude towards the people I am around and my material possessions.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Two different cultures Abstract Today I am going to discuss two different cultures. They are going to be the Maasai of Kenya and the Amish of America. What I am going to be discussuing is the way that some of…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    -Obligations to the land and peopleAboriginal spirituality is determined by the kinship because kinship is the fabric of traditional aborigional society. In this extended family everybody is related through the complex web of the dreaming.Tribes are made up of clans decended from a spirit ancestor denoted by a totem. The natural totem is from the clans region. It unifies the clan under the leadership of the spirit ancestor, creating a dreaming kinship with other clans bearing the same totem.Individuals have their own totem as traditional aboriginal society believes that procreation was a dreaming event. This creates…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This resilient value of family is the foundation of the kinship bond between the Navajo. They are a people that love their homeland and are spiritual connected to it. The Navajo Nation is one of the largest tribes in the United States, and the Navajo reservation encompasses over 16 million acres (Davina, R. T. B. 2006). As for kinship, the Navajos are a matrilineal society, where property, status, etc. are inherited through women. The Navajo people have a kinship system that follows the lineage of women (Carey, 2013). Women either bring a clan name with them, or are assigned a clan on acceptance into the tribe. Some come from existing clans of other tribes, while others may be created out of circumstance. The Diné society is based primarily upon kinship arising from clan affiliation, as each person is a member of the tribe by reason of his or her affiliation to one of the numerous clans (Carey, 2013). Each Navajo belongs to four different, unrelated clans. He or she belongs to his or her mother’s clan. He or she is born from his or her father’s clan. He or she has maternal and paternal grandfather’s clans. Traditionally, the people were forbidden to marry into the first two clans; today they are still strongly discouraged from doing so. The Navajo people are always living among relatives. This is an essential element that bonds this pastoral culture. Caring for and raising animals is a fundamental part of the culture. Younger family members learn the pastoral ways from grandparents, mothers and fathers. Even today, many Navajo children raised on the reservation continue to herd sheep and livestock. Although Navajo traditional life remains strong, like many cultures they’ve adapted to modern…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Comparing traditional and nontraditional cultures is one significant element in the psychology field known as Cross-cultural psychology. In cross-cultural psychology the underlying causes and effects of cultural diversity are examined. This field is a comparative field that involves analyzing behaviors between cultures and how cultural norms can vary. This paper will discuss the comparisons and contrasts among rural and urban African American cultures in reference to cross-cultural psychology. The values, beliefs, and behaviors among each of the cultures will be examined. A culture is established once a group of people share common beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, symbols, and religion. Cultural beliefs are passed down from one generation to the next. According to "Cross Cultural Psychology" (2012), “Behavior can be strongly influenced through biological tendencies; however, all behavior can be influenced by experience. Culture remains one important factor shaping individual behavior through customized sets of attitudes, beliefs, and values shared by a large population of region (Shiraev & Levy, 2010).”…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aboriginal Kinship

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kinship is one of the main principles of a foraging culture’s social organization. The way they interact with each other relies on the relationship they have together. If one member wanted to marry another member of the society, they would not behave in the same manner as they would with a blood relative such as a mother or father. In foraging societies the nuclear family is the most important because it is very adaptable to changing situations (Nowak & Laird, 2010).…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Navajo Culture

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The kinship system of the Navajo people is one filled with respect and co-operation which resides throughout their lives. Each member of the family plays an important role, allowing them to join together in harmony.…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Navajo

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Sense of Collectivism and Individualism among Husbands and Wives in Traditional and Bi-cultural Navajo Families on the Navajo Reservation. (2011). Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(4), 543-562.…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: CITED Aberle, David F. 1 9 6 1 Navaho. In Matrilineal Kinship. David M. Schneider and Kathleen Gough, eds. Pp. 96-201. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1 9 6 3 Some Sources o f Flexibility in Navaho Social Organization. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 19:l-18. Adams, William Y. 1 9 6 3 Shonto: A Study of the Role of the Trader in a Modern Navaho Community. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 188. 1 9 7 1 Navajo Ecology and Economy: A Problem in Cultural Values. In Apachean Culture History and Ethnology. Keith B. Basso and Morris E. Opler, eds. Pp. 77-81. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, No. 21. Collier, Malcolm C. 1 9 6 6 Local Organization among the Navaho. New Haven: HRAFlex Books. Fox, Robin 1967 The Keresan Bridge. ‘London School of Economics, Monographs on Social Anthropology, No. 35. Goody, Jack, ed. 1 9 6 6 The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, No. 1. Graves, Theodore D. 1 9 7 0 The Personal Adjustment of Navajo Indian Migrants to Denver, Colorado. American Anthropologist 72 :35-54. Hillery, George A., Jr., and Frank J. Essene 1 9 6 3 Navajo Population: An Analysis of the 1960 Census. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 19:297-313. Johnston, Denis F. 1 9 6 6 An Analysis of Sources of Information o n the Population of the Navaho. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 197. Kluckhohn, Clyde, and Dorothea C. Leighton 1 9 4 6 The Navaho. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.…

    • 15178 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays