San Joaquin River Restoration Case Study

Critical issues which have created through plans concerning the San Joaquin River Restoration. Renovations of the river are not receiving stability and funding for dams and technology which have the ability to limit economic destruction for many San Joaquin Valley farmers. Restoration plans have also claimed salmon will be conveyed into the large mass of water. According to Monty Schmitt of the Natural Resources Defense Council, transporting salmon into the river is crucial to stimulate California’s salmon fishery. Renovations and restorations of the San Joaquin Valley have claimed to properly raise and protect the salmon from brutal fisherman. Nevertheless, restoration plans developed for the river have harshly impacted farmers. Tim Stearns, administrator of the Lyles Center of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, has stated water needs to be
The process of restoration along the San Joaquin River will allow canals to be enhanced, levies to be developed, and water and monetary certainty to be enforced. After a lawsuit had been established concerning restoration of the river, farmer’s rights and privileges to utilize water had been prohibited. However, a decision had been enforced during restoration of the San Joaquin River. After restoration and alterations, scientists began observations of the restored river by noting the flow and streaming of water, the reactions wildlife would have on the newly created environment, and any changes which will be necessary to allow the river to flourish and thrive. New developments and restoration of river have become an extreme benefit, significantly impacting the population and societies of the San Joaquin Valley. “It’s more than just for fish. It’s going to be good for recreation, for all kinds of other endangered species. We’re doing more than just bringing back a few fish into the system. We’re creating a river and that’s going to be an amazing thing.”