She tells about how O’Connor encouraged her in Ginsburg’s first day in the Court. Throughout the article, Sandra O’Connor’s great characteristics are being displayed. According to Ginsburg, O’Connor is independent, open-minded, hard working and intelligent. She also treats people well. At the end, Ginsburg appraises O’Connor for her contributions to justice, and wants to “follow her lead.”
The article is a reliable and solid evidence. First, Sullivan is an influential lawyer, and she was the Dean of Stanford Law School. She was considered to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Thus, she has great knowledge in the law industry to write an article in the Harvard Law Review. Also, the information is from Ruth Ginsburg, O’Connor’s colleague.
This article gives the concise information about the nomination of Sandra O’Connor. First, Reagan nominated O’Connor because of his previous promise. Next, Sandra O’Connor was an attorney, a judge and the first female state Senate majority leader in the country. The author also provides the names of the two famous people who support her. They are Barry Goldwater and William Rehnquist. Lastly, the article tells how long she served on the Supreme Court and her impact to the percentage of female law students from her nomination to her …show more content…
This article is also in the December 2013 issue of Harvard Business Review. First, Beard asks her about her experience of growing up on a ranch. Then O’Connor tells her a story and a lesson that she learned from her father. Beard also asks about the time when she was on the Supreme Court such as her working relationship and how she picks people to work for her. O’Connor also answers the personal questions about her husband, her children and her struggle. O’Connor gives advice to women who are working on the fields that are considered only for men. Lastly, Beard finished the interview with a question about her recent