Preview

Satirical Nature of South Park

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Satirical Nature of South Park
Ariel Searcy
Teacher Mary Ellen Jones
AP Literature
5 February 2013

Abusing Free Speech? The Satirical Nature of South Park Warning: This thesis paper deals with a controversial and raunchy television show. Some content may be inappropriate for a younger audience (or immature persons.) While many Americans (and certainly other disapproving countries) would view the popular American television show as a threat through its mockery for several reasons, South Park employs the right to free speech to its utmost advantage time and time again, creating an undeniable truth that to be a truly free country, we must show that we are not afraid to protect and utilize our rights. Free speech is defined as “the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc.” (dictionary.reference.com). This historic privilege of the American people has been tested time and time again, leading one to wonder if it is truly freedom of speech. An excellent topic of debate would be the popular American television show, South Park. Since 1997 this show has gained cultural significance, both through its raunchy, debatable humor and direct mockery of what many still believe to be sensitive topics. In the words of a distressed blogger on cinematicallycorrect.wordpress.com:
“When the show first aired, I was in college and much like any other 20-year old male, worshipped the show…[now] I am not impressed…[they] have been obnoxiously crude.” Obviously, the general public is not satisfied nowadays. After pushing the envelope (more than) a few too many times, many citizens cry in outrage the creators are going too far in their quest for a good laugh. A particularly memorable instance is the 2006 episode “Cartoon Wars: Part 1” which featured the Muslim prophet Muhammed; just the very idea that he was going to be onscreen for a couple seconds sparked retaliation from Middle

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spanish 2 answes

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Freedom of Speech is one of the most powerful amendments that we have as apart of the United States Constitution. Without this right many ideas, beliefs and inventions would not exist today and the majority of the society would be left in ignorance. This right is given to all American citizens and allows them to speak their minds, beliefs and ideas to anybody of people that are willing to listen to them. Though Freedom of Speech is considered a general terms that applies to all forms of speech, there are a few exceptions to the rule.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Such as, a sexist scene in the show where a businessman says, “Female coworkers are a peculiar animal and they are very insecure about their appearance, and tell them every day how beautiful they look even if they’re homely and unkempt; or even a firm open-palm slap on the behind (302).” People were offended and felt ashamed. That’s when Peacocke disagreed with her own point and then understood Dubner point where he said, “Those who don’t often watch the program, he could easily see how the cartoon takes pleasure in controversial humor just for its own sake; but those who pay more attention and think about the creators’ intentions can see how family guy satires some aspects of American culture (303).” Peacocke looked at that as an eye opener and started to like the show…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States prides itself on the freedoms that are afforded to each of its citizens. Among those freedoms is the first amendment freedom of speech. However, that freedom is often called into question. For instance, the Snyder v. Phelps case. In the Snyder v. Phelps case, Albert Snyder who is the father of Matthew A. Snyder, argues how the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) picketed his son’s funeral asserting offensive statements due to his Albert Snyder’s homosexuality. Moreover, Snyder filed a lawsuit against the WBC “for defamation, intrusion, upon seclusion, infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy” (“Snyder v. Phelps” Wikipedia). The speech discussed in the Snyder v. Phelps case deserves the protection of the first amendment.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Family Guy and Freud

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and when it comes to the television series, Family Guy, everyone does. A person either loves the series or absolutely hates it. Antonia Peacocke voiced her opinion on the hit series in her article, Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. At first she was just another addition to the other Family Guy haters, but she eventually came around and saw the humor after the hard to swallow punch lines. “Family Guy does not aim to hurt… creators take certain measures to keep it from hitting too hard.” Peacock says (307). What the creators are reenacting in the shows are not exactly, socially acceptable. However, that’s what draws its viewers, its cutting edge take on society’s problems and differences. The fact is, what is being said in the series is not a lie, maybe more bias due to the point of view, but it’s based off the truth. The reason people find the show so funny is because it may have happened to them or a friend. One may be offend by Family Guys risky takes on sensitive subjects, but it is the truth and the truth hurts sometimes.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Family Guy Satire

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    South Park is an American animated television comedy series about four third grade schoolboys who live in the small, backward mountain town of South Park. The series was created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone, and has been aired by Comedy Central since 1997. The show is well known for its pop-culture parody, outrageous humor, and sardonic handling of current events. Family Guy is an American animated television series about a family in the fictional town of Quahog, Rhode Island. The show focuses on the fictional Griffin family and its ungainly character Peter Griffin. Seth MacFarlane created the show for the FOX channel. Family Guy was cancelled once in 2000 and again in 2002, but strong DVD sales and the substantial viewership…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maajid Nawaz, a British activist, radio host, and politician stated how “satire is, by definition, offensive. It is meant to make us feel uncomfortable. It is meant to make us scratch our heads, think, do a double-take, and then think again.” America has adopted the use of satire from England and has openly welcomed the use of it in our nation. Americans encourage the attacks on government that satire brings because they help us to see the shortcomings in society and push for change to improve the nation. In the comic series Doonesbury, Garry Trudeau effectively satirizes the U.S. government and media through his comedic portrayals of their failings and priorities.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Satire - Family Guy

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Begin to analyse a ‘Family Guy’ episode to understand the satire used within the episode.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Culture of Shut Up,” author Jon Lovett ponders the current state of public dialogue in the age of the Internet. Lovett is a Los Angeles based writer and a former speech writer for President Barack Obama (13). The author suggests that the internet, which provides for exceptional access to diverse public speech, will inevitably include speech that is offensive. Lovett’s opinion is that people must resist the urge to punish such speech, if people want to allow a range of voices to be heard and makes his argument majorly effective by using humor and providing popular examples of where people have been told “to shut up”.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intent of the Framers

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Freedom of speech is part of the first amendment which states, “You are free to say almost anything except that which is obscene, slanders another person, or has a high probability of inciting others to take imminent lawless action.” (Patterson, 2008, p. 98) With the freedom of speech it is necessary to put certain restraints into place. The government cannot restrict what people say unless there is a clear and present danger to other people from the voicing of the statement. The freedom of speech was originally intended to give people the right to voice their opinion without being taken to court for it as long as it did not hurt anyone. Currently freedom of speech is viewed as a way to allow people the chance to speak for themselves. By allowing this government is allowing people to have a say in their governance and not ruled by the government without their input. This allows us to have a say in our government and what is represented by us. In 1927, Fiske vs. Kansas was a case that helped to invalidate state laws that restricted expression. The events that changed freedom of speech over the years are the burning of the flag court case, the “pentagon paper” publishing, and other such events throughout the years.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marcus Schulzke Meaning

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    27). I like this quote because it encourages us to think differently, and not be confined by society and the meanings or messages that they place on words. It asks us to questions the words we use on a day to day basis. To me, the creators of this episode were aiming to change the way that we see the word “fag” as an insult to gay people. I thought that this episode was an overall positive idea by the show. It is not just a typical episode of South Park, however, a more challenging and shocking perspective, that allows us to think about the way we use language. The article empowered me and made me realize that we don’t have to use offensive and unkind language, rather, we can use words in a positive…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance on Television

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In sociology, the term deviance refers to behaviors or attitudes which go against certain cultural norms. It is evident that deviance is a fascinating topic not only for sociologist, but for television industry and its viewers, as well. In recent years, increasing number of shows begun to feature individuals violating every kind of social norm from folkways to taboos. The Secret Life of the American Teenager, an American television series on the ABC Family television network, is one of the many contemporary shows that portray deviant behaviors on national television. It’s intended for the target audience of teens and their families who are trying to cope in a culture where teen girls and boys are sexually active.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Until then, South Park needs to keep doing exactly what it is doing. More versions of the Danish cartoons must be printed every day. It is long past time to stop crucifying peaceful Christians and coddling…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One perk of living in America is that it gives us a freedom of speech. Some people wisely use this, other abuse it. For instance, currently there are riots going on all over our country because they do not believe that Donald Trump should be president. These people are allowed to say what they think without any harsh penalties, but is this the proper way to use it. Another way this is used is through the nominee of running for president. Many times Donald Trump mocked people and said what he wanted in front of millions of people. If he was anywhere that did not have freedom of speech, he would have been arrested. He was also allowed to say what he thought was wrong with the country and how he is going to change it. At the same time this is…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays