Preview

Science Succeeds Because It Employs a Rigorous Method of Discovering Reliable Knowledge of Nature

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science Succeeds Because It Employs a Rigorous Method of Discovering Reliable Knowledge of Nature
“Science succeeds because it employs a rigorous method of discovering reliable knowledge of nature”. Do you agree?

“An attempt to force nature into the preformed and relatively inflexible box that the paradigm supplies”. This is a quote from Thomas Kuhn, on the objectivity of science. Science, to a certain extent, is indeed not successful in discovering reliable knowledge of nature.

There are a few keywords which require definitions to set the benchmark for this question. Rigorous method would refer to continuous assessment and attempt to falsify present scientific logics. As for reliable, all theories which have yet been falsified, and do not fall under the category of pseudo science will be reliable.

As such, I do not agree that science is successful because it employs a rigorous method of discovering reliable knowledge of nature.

A striking feature of doing research is that the aim is to discover what is known in advance.[1] This is crucial in understanding the fact that science itself does not aim at discovering the unknown, but rather proving what is known. A simple analogy of science is that of scientific research is similar to that of solving a puzzle. The final result of the research is already predicted way before research is being done. What is going to happen would be issue such as the 1919 Eddington’s eclipse experiment to test out whether Newton’s theory of gravity or Einstein’s theory of General Relativity stands. What actually happened was Eddington believed in Einstein’s theory and wanted to prove that it was true, and therefore he subconsciously minimized his errors in order to get the right result.[2] Here, we can see how science does not actually progress when results are predicted before researches are done. It actually leads to scientists editing results of experiments to prove theories which they support either intentionally or subconsciously. With research results being edited so frivolously, how can we still expect research

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knowledge, the key to progress, has proven to be a human being’s most powerful and significant weapon. We gain knowledge when we put our brain to work at the problems we need to solve in life. It doesn’t matter what we are trying to accomplish, whether it be creating a new technology or learning how to put together a puzzle, the matter of fact is that both request great examination and research to resolve and learn. Scientific research is a technique used to investigate phenomena, correct previous understanding, and acquire new knowledge. Knowledge could lead us to a possible cure for cancer, an alternative for fossil fuels, and the creation of a revolutionary technology. Nevertheless, all these benefits are a reason why John M. Barry writes about scientific research with admiration, curiosity, and passion in which he blends a use of rhetorical strategies in order to give off an overall perspective of the necessity and mystery within scientific research.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1 06 workfile

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scientific law cannot be experimentally disproved, Scientific theory is required to be challenged, to attempt to be disproven.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Geology Study Guide

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    | * A tentative conclusion/explanation about natural processes being questioned * It can be revised/changed as needed * Scientists are actually trying to prove the conclusion wrong…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Observation and experiment- this is done with great care, facts of nature are like building blocks of science and its results. Making sure things are as accurate and objective data that sets science apart from other modes,…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    made by nonscientists, particularly politicians. • Science is a fundamental way to understand the world around us, revealing knowledge systematically that is not accessible by other means.…

    • 1884 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    black sheep

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There’s many questions that scientist are currently addressing and many they will never be able to answer because of individual opinions and no evidence between any of the answers clearly because you can’t experiment any of it. For example in our modern day society there’s always debates on whether there’s a God or not? Around the world there’s many atheist that believe there is no such thing as God and there is no life after death. This is a question science wouldn’t be able to answer nor prove to us. They only way that would be possible is if someone died experienced the life after death and then resurrected and told us what happened, but clearly we know that’s impossible and will never happen!…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skills

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The scientific method has evolved, over many centuries, to ensure that scientists make meaningful discoveries, founded upon logic and reason rather than emotion.…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the scientific method

    • 2341 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Biology is the study of the phenomena of life, and biologists observe living systems and organisms, ask questions, and propose explanations for those observations. Science assumes that biological systems are understandable and can be explained by fundamental rules or laws. Scientific investigations share some common elements and procedures, which are referred to as the scientific method. Not all scientists follow these procedures in a strict fashion, but each of the elements is usually present. Science is a creative human endeavor that involves asking questions, making observations, developing explanatory hypotheses, and testing those hypotheses. Scientists closely scrutinize investigations in their field, and each scientist must present his or her work at scientific meetings or in professional publications, providing evidence from observations and experiments that supports the scientist’s explanations of biological phenomena.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The last and most obvious statement which says that science is right is Evolution. Evolution is a scientific theory that explains the origins of humanity and its development. Evolution is where a living organism adapts and evolves to become less primitive, and more likely to survive. It is NOT random. Not a single living organism that has ever been discovered shows any sign whatsoever of having evolved by non-Darwinian means. Evolution…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scientific Method

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages

    Learning Goal: To understand how the scientific method can be used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method is a procedure used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method consists of making observations, formulating hypotheses, designing and carrying out experiments, and repeating this cycle. Observations can be either quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative observations are measurements consisting of both numbers and units, such as the observation that ice melts at . In contrast, qualitative observations are observations that do not rely on numbers or units, such as the observation that water is clear. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation of the observations. The hypothesis is not necessarily correct, but it puts the scientist's understanding of the observations into a form that can be tested through experimentation. Experiments are then performed to test the validity of the hypothesis. Experiments are observations preferably made under conditions in which the variable of interest is clearly distinguishable from any others. If the experiment shows that the hypothesis is incorrect, the hypothesis can be modified, and further experiments can be carried out to test the modified hypothesis. This cycle is repeated, continually refining the hypothesis. If a large set of observations follow a reproducible pattern, this pattern can be summarized in a law—a verbal or mathematical generalization of a phenomenon. For example, over the years people observed that every morning the sun rises in the east, and every night the sun sets in the west. These observations can be described in a law stating, "The sun always rises in the east and sets in the west." After a great deal of refinement, a hypothesis can lead to a theory. A theory is an explanation of why something happens. For example, Newton's theory of gravitation explains why objects tend to fall toward the Earth (as well as explaining the interactions between the Earth and the other…

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The natural sciences are an area of knowledge which have significantly impacted our perception of the natural world. The natural sciences denote subjects such as physics, biology and chemistry. From my perspective, the natural sciences are an area of knowledge independent of culture. In order to reach this conclusion, I examined the scientific method. The scientific method is a method used to distinguish a science from a pseudo science ( fake science). According to the traditional picture of the scientific method, science is divided into 5 steps known as inductivism.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays