Preview

Scramble For Africa Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
841 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scramble For Africa Dbq Analysis
Francisco Osornio
Scramble for Africa
During the Berlin Conference from 1884-1885 the European powers divided up the continent of Africa in order to avoid wars amongst the European powers. However, not a single African leader was invited to the Berlin Conference. The leaders of the native African kingdoms reacted to European imperialism by clearly expressing their opposition to the European officials, highlighting how strange and hypocritical European culture was, and implementing any means available to fight the Europeans. The African leaders elucidated that they would never give in to European imperialism. Prempeh I, an Ashanti leader, clearly stated that he would never allow Britain to conquer the Ashanti kingdom (Doc. 2). Prempeh
…show more content…
Menelik II, emperor of Ethiopia, appealed to the great powers of Europe to have mercy on Ethiopia in sight of their common faith (Doc. 3). He believed that his appeal to their shared faith would cause the Europeans to rethink their actions, but Menelik II did not understand that the Europeans regarded material wealth as more important than their faith. Ndansi Kumalo described how the British treated the Africans like animals, and they had superior weapons (Doc. 4). Ndansi Kumalo and his people did not understand that the British had superior weapons, so they were defeated and bewildered by the horrendous treatment they received from the British. Mojimba, an African chief recounted a battle against the British and African mercenaries, and he described how the Europeans had rifles (Doc. 9). Mojimba believed that the Europeans were more evil than the Africans were, and he realized that the Europeans were more evil than the Africans were, and he realized that the Europeans were hypocritical in the Christian faith with their malevolent actions. Menelik II’s option that the European powers would not attack his country because they shared the same faith was influenced by his faith as a fellow Christian and his understanding of Christianity that Christian powers should be friendly toward one another. The African leaders had a difficult time understanding the European culture and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    abundance of copper, rubber and ivory were appealing to him. He initially pledged to promote…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adowa in 1896 where Ethiopians were victorious over Italian troops is also not clear on why the Ethiopians fought back (doc.5). Another document on why the Ethiopians fought back so vigorously would be more helpful. In a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed on the Congo River in 1877, Mojimba, an Africna chief, describes how the British had overcame Africans with guns n a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed one of his men everyday and it is obvious that change ropean intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason why these Africans gave in would reveal if they saw the European threat as a to their…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In document two, the Ashanti leader responds to the British offer for protectorate status by declining very politely. He stated that his offer is something that he deeply considered, but he decided to reject this offer because he wanted to maintain their tradition. The leader also stated, however, that he didn’t want to be colony, but still have a friendly relationship. In document three, the Ethiopian emperor Menelik II, wrote a letter to Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia saying that he would not just watch the Europeans take over his lands. He wanted to keep his Christian ways and keep the country safe while he still appealed the Europeans. Over time, many Africans tried to avoid falling under European pressure and still maintained a good relationship with…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scramble Dbq Analysis

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1884, the European government colonized areas in Africa which was known as the European Scramble for Africa. There are various ways of actions and reactions of the Africans in response to the European Scramble for Africa. Some are Peaceful Cooperation, some are violent, some are based on increased religion, and some are total rejection. These reactions are shown in Documents one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and nine. Each document has a person’s point of view and a date (1800’s-1907).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We can see in Document 1; the contract from the Royal Niger Company, that the Europeans wanted to make it seem as if they were giving the African Leaders a choice to give up their land. Leaders of these tribes would have believed that signing wasn’t an obligation and could refuse if they wanted. This shown in Document 2; The letter to Britain from the Ashanti leader, Prempeh I, where he states,” My kingdom of Ashanti will never commit itself to any such policy”. He declined in a respectful honorable manner, expecting the Europeans to leave them be. From Prempeh I’s point of view, he most likely believed that they were in charge of their own fate, but Europe did not just step back. An additional document that would support this would be from an African leader who signed the document, to see how they were treated in comparison to those who refused to…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    in 1880, Europeans controlled 10% of Africa; by 1914, controlled all except Liberia & Ethiopia; the Berlin Conference established the rules among European powers for carving up Africa…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At no point before 1957 were the citizens of the Sub-Saharan Africa region considered to be equal to their supreme Caucasian counterparts. It was especially hard because there was a strong British and French influence and most of the colonies were controlled by one of the two. The attitudes of the citizens began to change when Ghana received its independence from British rule in 1857. The first example of this new found equality came when Queen Elizabeth II came to visit Ghana. “The citizens erected huge side-by-side posters of the queen and their new leader, Nkrumah. This public exposure showed the new beginnings that were starting to transform the region. Kwame Nkrumah became the poster child for this new move of independence and he is responsible for inspiring other prominent leaders to lead their countries into independence in a peaceful way. However, all the countries in the region did not follow his peaceful ways specifically Kenya. They were not able to experience the new found equality because they were occupied by the constant friction between the white settlers and these settlers saw the Africans that lived there “traitorous”.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Doc. 1, The Royal Niger Company has conducted a document that many African rulers signed, handing over their territory to this British government. Even with its arrogant point of view, this contract is a peaceful attempt to consult with the Africans instead of trying to battle them for the land and control. Doc. 2 is an Ashanti leader chose to peacefully decline the offer of “protection” from Her Majesty to Queen of England and Empress of India, but also wanted to remain friendly with the White men. In Doc. 3, the emperor of Ethiopia chooses to peacefully appeal to the British by explaining that there is no reason to take control of their land and people, for they shared the religion of Christianity. All three of these documents exemplify a peaceful and diplomatic approach to the Scramble.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Belgian set off a scramble among other European powers to get their presence on the continent. In 1887, to avoid conflict, Europeans leaders met in Berlin, Germany, to set up rules for colonizing Africa and divided Africa with little regard. In 1850, most of Africa had been free. Seventy years later, most of the continent was under European rule. Africa has loss their independence…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Scramble For Africa

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Document 1 (The Standard form signed by many African Rulers by The Royal Niger Company) and Document 2 (Ashanti Leader's response to a British Official) discuss how the British give the illusion that African Nations have a choice in this matter. After all, the British offer a contract to be signed by African Leaders which implies that Leaders may choose to accept or decline. After being presented with this dilemma, most African Nations such as the Ashanti wished to remain independent and to preserve their relations with Europe. The African's felt like they were in control of their own fate due to the false illusion of free choice. The British obviously anticipated this resistance as they later used warfare to control Africa by force.…

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many African kingdoms, who had governed themselves before European colonization, were against the colonization of their lands under other European countries. Based on an African Ashanti queen’s account, in document six, it is clear that the colonizing Europeans had very little respect for monarchies already in place (Doc 6). This alone spurred the subjects of African kingdoms to violence with their colonizers, the Europeans. Another leader of the Herero people, having already allowed German occupation and suffered for it, urges his fellow leaders not to peacefully…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 19th century and into the early 20th century, the countries of Africa faced unprecedented amounts of imperialism and foreign interference from many of the European countries, England, Germany and France mainly. Sometimes referred to as the “scramble for Africa” are the events that took place after the Berlin conference in 1884. This mass colonization of Africa resulted the destruction of many cultures as well as sacred land that the Europeans used for mining or other industrial endeavors. The after effects of the colonization of Africa by the Europeans is still visible today, with the official language of many African countries being English, French or Spanish as well as Christianity being a powerful force in many African cultures…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The natives of Africa were against the invasion of European explorers, and tensions escalated when treaties were misinterpreted. Europeans sought sovereign control over natives, and the Africans believed the treaties were simply diplomatic and commercial friendships. Soon African rulers realized that they had been deceived. European powers were soon attempting to impose and exercise political control over the land. This was met by military resistance of Africans who resisted colonial…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During imperialism an English businessman, Cecil Rhodes, addressed the public of Britain to boast that “we (Britons) are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race” (Rhodes). Influenced by their belief of being a superior race, the British found it reasonable to acquire the land and resources of inferior races because they believed their actions would cause the lesser races eventually benefit by being civilized and educated. In addition, if the British managed to convert the Africans to believe in their faith, they would possess a civilized group of individuals who could support them during times of difficulty. During the 7 years Okonkwo was away from Umuofia, the white men had started to take away the and of the natives to “[Bring] a government.. And build a court where the District Commissioner judged in ignorance. They also built a prison which was fill of men who had offended against the white man’s law” (Achebe 174-175). Africans were subject to the will of the Europeans because they lacked the capabilities to stand up against the British for themselves. They were also oppressed because they were forced to give up their land due to technological disadvantages and be forced to get judge by someone who was naturally biased towards his own…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the themes the documentary covers was the false pretenses that Europeans claimed to justify the Colonization of Africa. During the early 20th century (1900’s), Northern and Eastern Africa still had a pervasive slave culture. In the North, the remnants of the Ottoman Empire still practiced slavery, while the Muslims were the responsible figureheads in the East. Following the centuries of trans-Atlantic slave trade between Europe, Africa, and the “New World”, Europe had abolished the practicing of slavery. In 1884, the European powers that be called for the “Berlin Conference’’. Part of the conference was to organize “The Scramble for Africa”. The term was used to describe the West’s desire to introduce themselves as administrators of the African continent. One of the justifications for the conference/European’s colonialism, was that the West had “a duty” to end the barbarism of slavery still existing on the continent through the West’s new found morality. Part of the European’s plan for administration was also the fragmenting of Africa with artificial political boundaries. While this “organized” Africa in a convenient matter for the Europeans, it led to ethnic divisions/rivalries that are still in existence today. One of the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays