Preview

Seasoned Equity Offerings Quality of Accounting Information and Expected Flotation Costs

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
23758 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Seasoned Equity Offerings Quality of Accounting Information and Expected Flotation Costs
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Journal of Financial Economics 92 (2009) 443–469

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Financial Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jfec

Seasoned equity offerings: Quality of accounting information and expected flotation costs$
Gemma Lee a, Ronald W. Masulis b,Ã a b

W. Paul Stillman School of Business, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA

a r t i c l e in fo
Article history: Received 30 January 2007 Received in revised form 22 February 2008 Accepted 25 April 2008 Available online 3 March 2009 JEL classifications: D82 G12 G14 G24 G32 M41 M43 Keywords: Seasoned equity offering SEO Stock offer Stock issue Asymmetric information Accounting information Accruals quality Dechow and Dichev model Offer size Flotation costs Announcement effect Underwriting fees Gross spread Withdrawn offers Cancelled SEOs

abstract
Flotation costs represent a significant loss of capital to firms and are positively related to information asymmetry between managers and outside investors. We measure a firm’s information asymmetry by its accounting information quality based on two extensions of the Dechow and Dichev [2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review 77, 35–59] earnings accruals model, which is a more direct approach to assessing the information available to outside investors than the more commonly used proxies. Our main hypothesis is that poor accounting information quality raises uncertainty about a firm’s financial condition for outside investors, though not necessarily for insiders. This accounting effect lowers demand for a firm’s new equity, thereby raising underwriting costs and risk. Using a large sample of seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), we show that poor accounting information quality is associated with higher flotation costs in terms of larger underwriting



References: Aboody, D., Kaznik, R., 2000. CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 73–1000. Altinkilic, O., Hansen, R.S., 2000. Are there economies of scales in underwriting fees? Evidence of raising external financing costs. Review of Financial Studies 13, 191–218. Arellano, M., 1987. Computing robust standard errors for within-group estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49, 431–434. Asquith, P., Mullins Jr., D.W., 1986. Seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 15, 61–89. Autore, D., Kumar, R., Shome, D., 2008. The revival of shelf-registered corporate equity offerings. Journal of Corporate Finance 14, 32–50. Balsam, S., 1998. Discretionary accounting choices and CEO compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (3), 229–252. Bhagat, S., Hess, A., 1986. Size effects of seasoned stock issues: empirical evidence. Journal of Business 59 (4, Part I), 567–584. Brav, A., Gompers, P.A., 2003. The role of lockups in initial public offerings. Review of Financial Studies 16, 1–29. Butler, A., Grullon, G., Weston, J.P., 2005. Stock market liquidity and the cost of issuing equity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40, 331–348. Chen, H., Ritter, J.R., 2000. The seven percent solution. Journal of Finance 55, 1105–1131. Choe, H., Masulis, R.W., Nanda, V., 1993. Common stock offerings across the business cycle: theory and evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance 1, 3–31. Corwin, S.A., 2003. The determinants of underpricing for seasoned equity offers. Journal of Finance 58, 2249–2279. DeAngelo, L.E., 1988. Managerial competition, information costs, and corporate governance: the use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10, 3–36. Dechow, P., Sloan, R., Sweeney, A., 1995. Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review 70, 193–225. Dechow, P.M., Dichev, I.D., 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review 77, 35–59. Dor, A.B., 2003. The determinants of insiders’ selling at initial public offerings: an empirical analysis. Unpublished Working Paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Drucker, S., Puri, M., 1999. On the benefits of current lending and underwriting. Journal of Finance 60, 2762–2799. DuCharme, L.L., Malatesta, P.H., Sefcik, S.E., 2004. Earnings management, stock issues, and shareholder lawsuits. Journal of Financial Economics 71, 27–49. Eckbo, B.E., Masulis, R.W., 1992. Adverse selection and the rights offer paradox. Journal of Financial Economics 32, 293–332. Eckbo, B.E., Masulis, R.W., Norli, O., 2007. Security offerings. In: Eckbo, E. (Ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance. Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam (Chapter 13). Ecker, F., Francis, J., Olsson, P., Schipper, K., 2005. Comparing total and current accruals quality. Unpublished Working Paper, Duke University, Durham, NC. Edelen, R., Kadlec, G., 2005. Issuer surplus and the partial adjustment of IPO prices to public information. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 347–373. Erickson, M., Wang, S., 1999. Earnings management by acquiring firms in stock for stock mergers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 27, 149–176. Fama, E., French, K., 1997. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics 43, 153–194. Francis, J., Lafond, R., Olsson, P., Schipper, K., 2004. Costs of equity and earnings attributes. Accounting Review 79, 967–1010. Francis, J., Lafond, R., Olsson, P., Schipper, K., 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39, 295–327. Gaver, J.J., Gaver, K.M., Austin, J., 1995. Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 3–28. Guidry, F., Leone, A.J., Rock, S., 1999. Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business-unit managers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 113–142. Habib, M., Ljungqvist, A., 2001. Underpricing and the entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: theory and evidence. Review of Financial Studies 14 (2), 433–458. ARTICLE IN PRESS G. Lee, R.W. Masulis / Journal of Financial Economics 92 (2009) 443–469 469 Healy, P., 1985. The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting principles. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 85–107. Heckman, J., 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47, 153–161. Holthausen, R., Larcker, D., Sloan, R., 1995. Annual bonus schemes and manipulation of earnings, 1995: additional evidence on bonus plans and income management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 29–74. Jones, J.J., 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research 29, 193–228. Jung, K., Kim, Y.C., Stulz, R., 1996. Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and security issue decision. Journal of Financial Economics 42, 159–185. Kim, Y., Park, M.S., 2005. Pricing of seasoned equity offers and earnings management. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40, 435–463. Kothari, S.P., Leone, A.J., Wasley, C.E., 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39, 163–197. Krasker, W.S., 1986. Stock price movements in response to stock issues under asymmetric information. Journal of Finance 41, 93–105. Larcker, D.F., Richardson, S.A., 2004. Fees paid audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research 42, 625–658. Lee, I., Lochhead, S., Ritter, J., Zhao, Q., 1996. The costs of raising capital. Journal of Financial Research 19, 59–74. Lee, G., Masulis, R.W., 2007. Do underwriters or venture capitalists restrain earnings management by IPO issuers. Unpublished Working Paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Li, X., Masulis, R.W., 2007. Venture capital investment by IPO underwriters: certification, alignment of interest, or moral hazard? Unpublished Working Paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Liu, Y., Malatesta, P.H., 2006. Credit ratings and the pricing of seasoned equity offerings. Unpublished Working Paper, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Liu, M., Wysocki, P., 2007. Cross-sectional determinants of information quality proxies and cost of capital measures. Unpublished Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Ljungqvist, A., Wilhelm Jr., W.J., 2003. IPO pricing in the dot-com bubble. Journal of Finance 58, 723–752. Lowry, M., Shu, S., 2002. Litigation risk and IPO underpricing. Journal of Financial Economics 65, 309–335. Marquardt, C., Wiedman, C.I., 1998. Voluntary disclosure, information asymmetry, and insider selling through secondary equity offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (4), 505–537. Masulis, R.W., Korwar, A.N., 1986. Seasoned equity offerings: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Economics 15, 91–117. McNichols, M., 2002. Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review 77, 61–69. Mikkelson, W.H., Partch, M.M., 1986. Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process. Journal of Financial Economics 15, 31–60. Myers, S., Majluf, N., 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187–221. Mola, S., Loughran, T., 2004. Discounting and clustering in seasoned equity prices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, 1–3. Perry, S., Williams, T., 1994. Earnings management preceding management buyout offers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18, 157–179. Puri, M., 1999. Commercial banks as underwriters: implication for the going public process. Journal of Financial Economics 54, 133–163. Ragan, S., 1998. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50, 101–122. Shivakumar, L., 2000. Do firms mislead investor by overstating earnings before seasoned equity offerings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 339–371. Sloan, R.G., 1993. Accounting earnings and top executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 55–100. Smith Jr., C., 1977. Alternative methods for raising capital: rights versus underwritten offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 273–307. Teoh, S.H., Welch, I., Wong, T.J., 1998a. Earnings management and the long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 53, 1935–1974. Teoh, S.H., Welch, I., Wong, T.J., 1998b. Earnings management and the long-run performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50, 63–100. Teoh, S.H., Wong, T.J., Rao, G.R., 1998. Are accruals during initial public offerings opportunistic? Review of Accounting Studies 3, 175–208. Teoh, S.H., Wong, T.J., 2002. Why new issue and high-accrual firms underperform: the role of analysts’ credulity. Review of Financial Studies 15, 869–900. Wooldridge, J.M., 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Wysocki, P.D., 2005. Assessing earnings and accruals quality: US and international evidence. Unpublished Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Underwriters play an important role in the IPO process. For instance, they are responsible for the advertisement of the IPO to the institutional investors who then table their bids for determination. After the tabling of the bids, it is the role of the underwriters to decide how to allocate the shares to the institutional investors. In fact, they are responsible for the type of investor they want to acquire stock at the company. For instance, reputation of the institutional investor is considered while allocating shares. Other important factors that are usually put into consideration include length of investment, that is long-term or short-term, and are the institutional investors domestic or foreign?…

    • 1182 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Earnings management, in exchange listed companies, is not fraud but a case of caveat emptor for investors”…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    S & S Air Case Study

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (Eds.). (2011). Essentials of corporate finance (7th ed., Rev.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HW 6 Fin 402 Solutions

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . “I was amazed to find that the announcement of a stock issuance drives down the value of the firm by 30%, on average, of the proceeds of the issue. That issue cost dwarfs the underwriter’s spread and the administrative costs of the issue. It makes common stock issues prohibitively expensive.”…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rosetta Stone Ipo

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Ritter, J. , 2011,” Initial Public Offerings: Underpricing Statistics Through 2011”, Retrieved 15 March 2012, from http://bear.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/IPOs2011Underpricing1912.pdf…

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jetblue Ipo

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using information from the case we perceived the IPO pricing of $24-26 was determined by using the comparable multiples approach. Therefore, we will use the discounted cash flows method to determine an introductory price and evaluate whether it is in-line with the current proposed price. Exhibit B provides a description of each method.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gregory, K., & Uma, V. (2013). Are accruals a proxy for fundamental risk? The association of firm-specific economic characteristics with negative accruals. Advances in Management, 6(2), 20-27.…

    • 3938 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stock Options

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many years ago stock options were rarely used as incidental benefits for top executives. Nowadays, compensating employee whit stock options has become an increasingly common practice. Before the year 1996, only the intrinsic value method was used to record these transactions. This method distorted the issuer’s reported financial condition and results of operations, which could lead to inappropriate decisions taken by investors. Followed by the increased use of employee stock options and the surrounding controversy of its recording method, on the year 1996 the fair value method was introduced to be used as an alternative to the intrinsic method and on 2004 the intrinsic value method was completely discontinued. The Fair value method represent a better approach to the benefit of financial statements users given its many advantages.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The focus of this paper is to examine and research the financing issues that an organization must face when going public. The team has selected Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. as the organization which has had an initial public offering in the last three years. The learning team will address registration, disclosure, and compliance issues and cost of issuance. In addition, the team will examine the impact on ownership control and return as well as the source and application of funds.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ch 16 Study Guide

    • 2947 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Chapter 16 examines the issues related to accounting for dilutive securities at date of issuance and at time of conversion. Also, the impact of the computation of earnings per share is presented. The significance attached to the earnings per share figure by stock-holders and potential investors has caused the accounting profession to direct a great deal of attention to the calculation and presentation of earnings per share.…

    • 2947 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    July 31, 2006 Abstract In about one-third of US IPOs between 1996 and 2000, executives received stock options with an exercise price set equal to the IPO offer price (rather than a price determined by the market). Among firms with such “IPO options”, 58 percent of top executives receive a net gain from underpricing, meaning the gain from IPO options exceeds the loss from the dilution of their pre-IPO shareholdings. If executives can influence the IPO offer price, we expect a positive relation between these IPO options and underpricing. Alternatively, executives may be able to influence the timing and terms of their stock options, and this would similarly predict a positive relation between IPO options and underpricing. However, we fail to find any evidence of such a relation. Our results run counter to the emerging literature claiming that managers blatantly take self-serving actions to improve their personal welfare at shareholder expense. ____________________________________________________________…

    • 15520 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Financial Analysis

    • 5400 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations. The Journal of Finance , 57 (4), 1795–1828.…

    • 5400 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keywords: corporate governance, earnings management, foreign and domestic institutional investors, investor protection, management incentives, monitoring. JEL Classifications: G23, G34, M41…

    • 7735 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ktm Case Report

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Cited: Jones, T., & Swaleheen, M. u. (2010). Endogenous Examination of Underwriter Reputation and IPO Returns. Managerial Finance, 36(4), 284-293.…

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Columbia Business School established the Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis (CEASA) in 2003 under the direction of Professors Trevor Harris and Stephen Penman. The center aims to be a leading voice for independent, practical solutions for financial reporting and security analysis, promoting financial reporting that reflects economic reality, and encouraging investment practices that communicate sound valuations. CEASA’s mission is to develop workable solutions to issues in financial reporting and accounting policy; produce a core set of principles for equity analysis; collect and synthesize best thinking and best practices; disseminate ideas to regulators, analysts, investors, accountants, and management; and promote sound research on relevant issues. Drawing on the wisdom of leading experts in academia, industry, and government, the center produces sound research and identifies best practices on relevant issues. CEASA’s guiding criterion is to serve the public interest by supporting the integrity of financial reporting and the efficiency of capital markets. Located in a leading university with a mandate for independent research, CEASA is positioned to spearhead a discussion of issues, with an emphasis on sound conceptual thinking and without obstacles of constituency positions. More information and access to current research is available on CEASA’s website at http://www.gsb.columbia.edu/ceasa. CEASA is supported by its generous sponsors—General Electric, IBM, and Morgan Stanley—and gratefully acknowledges the support of these organizations and their recognition of the need for excellence in accounting and security analysis.…

    • 86484 Words
    • 346 Pages
    Powerful Essays