Preview

Section 4 Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Section 4 Pros And Cons
We affirm resolved: “The supreme court rightly decided that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.”
Whoever proves the Supreme Court’s decision based on constitutionality wins. The round shall not stray to the effectiveness or benefits of Section 4 and instead should focus on constitutionality.

Contention 1: Section 4 is unconstitutional because it is outdated and fails strict scrutiny.
A. The preclearance formula is outdated and cannot be applied to states today.
According to US Department of Justice, “Section 4’s first element in the formula was whether the state maintained [literacy] "test or device.” The second element is if it can be determined that less than 50 percent of persons of voting age were registered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Your Name: Marcos Zuniga Case Name: California v Hodari Citation: 499 U.S. 621 Date Decided: 1991 Area of Law: Fourth Amendment Vote: 7/2 Scalia delivered the opinion of the court, in which justice Rehnquist, CJ, joined and White, Blackmun, O’ Conner, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ, joined. Stevens, filed a dissenting opinion, in which Marshall, J., joined Procedural History: California v Hodari first proceeding were through the juvenile courts.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A deeper focus and analysis on the Fifth Circuit’s jurisprudence in this area was required. The analysis focused on the past history of how the Fifth Circuit approached sufficiency arguments, and how its approach had shifted to the present (with Rubio’s case as the newest example). See footnote 3 and 4, and the enormous research required (footnote 4 as roughly 36 or more cases firming up a consistent pattern of Jackson’s application in sufficiency cases). By extension, additional time was necessary to detail how and why the Fifth Circuit had shifted in its application of Jackson over time.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They brought it to the Supreme court to see if Lopez should be convicted because he brought the gun to school. The issue contains the being stronger and better than everything else clause from Article VI named…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defendant, Lovett, argued that the section 304 was only intended to remove plaintiffs in Court. They argued that the section denied the due process and equal protection. The bill of attainder was an issue that here accorded the best treatment it received during the litigation. Lovett, then decided that the case should be brought to the Supreme…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Sessions v. Morales-Santana deals with the issue of whether or not a distinction based on gender in establishing derivative citizenship for immigrants violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection. The questions presented by this case are: (1) Whether Congress’s decision to require different physical presence requirements for unwed citizen mothers than unwed citizen fathers in order to pass citizenship to a foreign- born child violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection and (2) whether the court of appeals was mistaken in granting citizenship in the absence of any statutory authority.Thusly, the rights of immigrants and the right against gender discrimination are both at stake for the petitioner of this case. The case was granted on June 28, 2016, oral argument was held before the Supreme Court on November 9, 2016, and the case was decided on June 12, 2017.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holder case can directly effect the very poor, low-income citizens, as well as certain minorities who may have come to the U.S. illegally or have not yet obtained U.S. citizenship. Following the Supreme Court ruling, many states began to pass changes that would shift voter registration times as well as add new identification requirements. State legislatures involved had these changes made in an effort to challenge voter fraud and shrink voting budgets. However, many believe that these changes will only limit the right to vote, which is what Section 5 helped to protect against in the first place. The poor and these specific minority groups may not own government-approved identification, and they may not be able to find enough time in their work schedule to take time off to vote come Election Day. This can also indirectly effect the regular voting citizens in the states where these new changes were passed. If a particular town or district in one of these states happens to have a large low-income or minority population, then voter participation in that area could drastically drop. This effects the regular voting citizens because it now puts more stress on them to get out and participate on Election Day in order for their town or district to get enough votes…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most critical topic raised in Who’s Left Standing for State Sovereignty?: Private Party Standing to Raise Tenth Amendment Claims by Katherine Connolly is the Supreme Court and State courts oscillating view of the Tenth Amendment, the contradictory views between circuit court of appeals on the Amendment, and an analysis of private party Tenth Amendment standing. “In the decades since its adoption, American courts have vigorously debated the substantive meaning of this Amendment.” (Connolly 1540) Many of the circuit court of appeals have had a difficult time coming to an agreement on the underlying meaning of the Amendment. “Six circuit courts of appeals now hold the increasingly popular majority position that only states and not private parties may enforce the Tenth Amendment. Two circuit courts of appeals hold the once-majority position that private party standing to assert claims under the Tenth Amendment is permissible.” (Connolly 1541)…

    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    a. Article III Section 2 says that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in cases where there are citizens of two different states.…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bush Vs. Gore Case Study

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled 7'' 2 that the Florida Supreme Court's decision, calling for a statewide recount, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court stated that the Equal Protection clause guarantees individuals that their ballots cannot be devalued by "later arbitrary and disparate treatment". Even if the recount was fair in theory, it was unfair in practice. The record suggested that different standards were seemingly applied to the recount from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county. According to the 7'' 2 per curiam opinion, the statewide standard (that a "legal vote" is "one in which there is a 'clear indication of the intent of the voter could not guarantee that each county would count the votes in a constitutionally permissible fashion. The per curiam opinion stated that its applicability was "limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voting Rights Act 1982

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Instead, section 2 is violated if a court ends/decides that a voting practice has the effect of limiting the electoral influence of minorities, even if not by bias.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Ginsburg’s dissent argued that Congress’ power to enforce the 14th and 15th Amendments encompasses legislative action such as the Voting Rights Act. She believes Congress does not have unlimited authority, but must show that the means taken rationally advance a legitimate objective. By holding section 4 unconstitutional, the majority’s opinion makes it impossible to effectively enforce section 5. According to her, in voting rights cases the court should defer to Congress, because they have been given sweeping powers to protect such rights. The court should only ask if the methods used by Congress to address the problem are rational, and not subject them to a tougher test. According to Ginsburg, “Congress approached the 2006 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act with great care and seriousness, the same cannot be said of the court’s…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is good for both the renter and the landlord; the amount of money section 8 pays for rent varies based on the voucher holder's qualifications. Once a voucher holder locates a property and is approved by the property manager, there is a string of events that take place. The voucher holder fills out a form that the property manager signs. The voucher holder submits this form to his/her case worker at the Public Housing Agency. The case worker executes a contract with the property manager. This contract authorizes the Public Housing Agency to make subsidy payments on behalf of the tenant. If the tenant moves out of the unit, the contract ends and the tenant can move with continued assistance to another property. In addition, the Public Housing Agency must conduct a physical inspection of the property to ensure it meets section 8’s standards of safety and code, after the inspection is approved and the paperwork is in order, the tenant can move in.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    VOTING RIGHTS ACT

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I conclude my argument by saying that the new voting laws is allowing history to repeat itself by hindering and putting limits on factors that is used for voting in election.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holder, 2013). Shelby County, Alabama protested this section claiming that Congress had no constitutional right to do so. Because of the 5-4 turnout in the Supreme Court, that section of the Voting Rights Act was declared unconstitutional which was the final phase in the voter ID laws becoming effective. Without the national government being allowed to prevent Texas from applying this requirement on those grounds, the law was once again proven to be in accordance with federal…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays