College students are among the largest group of people that would be affected most by the new voting rights laws. Most college students enter college at age seventeen so once it’s time to go to the polls they would just be turning eighteen which is the age you are allowed to vote. That seem as if it wouldn’t be a problem but a lot of college students go out of state for college so the new voting right act would make it difficult for them to register to vote and also obtain the proper identification cards they will need. Congress against these laws argue that they affect elderly, minority and low-income groups that tend to vote Democratic. Obtaining photo ID can be costly and burdensome, with state ID requiring documents like a birth certificate that can cost up to $25 in some places, that would discourage them from wanting to vote and because they would feel like they have to do a lot just to get identification. The same goes for older people because they may not have the proper documents that’s necessary to get the identification cards and it would be more difficult for them to get around. Some may argue that the new voter identification law protects election form voter frauds but its post a similarities to voting barriers against black, poor, and minority people.
The law also cuts early voting by a week and eliminates same-day registration, early registration for high school students and straight-ticket voting. In previous elections those procedures have been used disproportionately by African Americans and democrats. I conclude my argument by saying that the new voting laws is allowing history to repeat itself by hindering and putting limits on factors that is used for voting in election.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Holder case can directly effect the very poor, low-income citizens, as well as certain minorities who may have come to the U.S. illegally or have not yet obtained U.S. citizenship. Following the Supreme Court ruling, many states began to pass changes that would shift voter registration times as well as add new identification requirements. State legislatures involved had these changes made in an effort to challenge voter fraud and shrink voting budgets. However, many believe that these changes will only limit the right to vote, which is what Section 5 helped to protect against in the first place. The poor and these specific minority groups may not own government-approved identification, and they may not be able to find enough time in their work schedule to take time off to vote come Election Day. This can also indirectly effect the regular voting citizens in the states where these new changes were passed. If a particular town or district in one of these states happens to have a large low-income or minority population, then voter participation in that area could drastically drop. This effects the regular voting citizens because it now puts more stress on them to get out and participate on Election Day in order for their town or district to get enough votes…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading the article “The Right to Vote is Never Safe” by Jon Grinspan, published on November 4th, 2017 there are several things that can be said. To begin with, this article is based on everything that took place not so long ago, that people have failed to realize how important it is today. Grinspan practically spoke on all that happened and that took place in order for black men and poor white men to finally vote. Grinspan also mentions the old Protestant elites and how they sought to hold voting from immigrants while rising urban machines sought to harness their votes. At first poor whites thought they had it bad because of obstacles that had to go through in order to get their vote in, but it was the colored men that had it worst.…
- 579 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Robert Powell goes on to explain that voter turnout is disadvantaged 13% by the party system and institutional factors, and 14% by registration laws. Legal and administrative obstacles, including time/place restrictions on registration and voting, affect the poor and uneducated more than the well-off and educated. Additionally, parties strategize which eligible voters, i.e. those they believe will vote for them, they will reach out to “activate and enlist.” They even went a step further with their attempted termination of the Motor Voter Act. They approach specific groups and tailor their campaigns and platforms around those people.…
- 977 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
voting writes. When it came time to pass the voting rights act, in 1965, there were…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
ALTHOUGH the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and its changes have brought an end to many voting terribly unfair treatments, voting practices continue to exist.…
- 368 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One Voting Amendment is that they lowered the voting age down. You now only have to be eighteen years of age, instead of the age prior. This is the 26th amendment, and was created during the cold, brutal Vietnam War. People decided that if someone older than eighteen could go to war, and die bravely for their country, they could also vote the next leader.…
- 247 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Compulsory voting would help citizens to become further educated about voting. In accordance to the George Mason University citizens with a lower education or are of a younger age, have a lower percentage of voter turnout(Doc. B). This would be caused by the fact that these citizens don’t have much knowledge of how to vote. Having compulsory voting would eliminate this due to the fact that…
- 619 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Voting Rights before the New Legislation:…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the next part of the article Toobin gives a brief history on the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which abolished discrimination in the South that kept people from voting. In doing so he was able to give the reader enough information on the act so they could easily understand the direction of the article. He explained that the law was signed by George W. Bush and the Supreme…
- 963 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 had 19 separate sections. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 protected the rights of voters in the United States. No voting qualifications to voters shall be imposed. It outlawed poll tax. American citizens could not be denied the right to vote based on race or color. The United States Attorney General was given the authority to appoint federal examiners to audit states, voting policies and practices if they felt there was a violation.…
- 79 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The lines are long, it’s raining, it’s hot, or it may be cold, but exercising your right to vote is as important as all of your other civil rights. As Americans we have came a very long way when it comes to protecting our civil rights, and choosing the right candidate to protect our country. In 1964, three civil right activist set out to set up a voter’s registry for African Americans, but it was short lived because they were brutally murder by members of the Klu Klux Klan in Philadelphia, Mississippi((IMBD). This helped pave the road for African Americans to get out and register to vote. Not long ago, only one-third of African Americans were registered to vote, and two third of the voters were white, because African Americans was terrified of voting, or they chose not to. While voting is a right that we all have, if you have committed a crime and it has been classified as a felon, in most states you are restricted from voting. Since the Voting Rights Act of 1965, there has been a significant increase of voters at the polls. It has increased significantly in the African America and Hispanic populations and due to this, President Obama, an African American, was voted into office in 2008, and is now serving his second term. There have been many protests regarding felons voting and their civil rights being violated. While three great men lost their lives over such a significant cause in Mississippi, in order for a convicted felon to vote in Mississippi, his or her state representative must personally author a bill reenfranchising that individual. Both houses of the legislature must then pass the bill. Re-enfranchisement can also be granted directly by the governor. (“ProCon.org”). …
- 1154 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Sharon Salzberg once said, “Voting is the expression of our commitment to ourselves, one another, this country and this world.” This is relevant to today because voting is overlooked and taken for granted. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 provided equal rights to all people and enabled all races the equality they deserve. This act was signed into law on August 6, 1965, by President Lyndon Johnson. It outlawed the discriminatory voting practices adopted in many southern states after the Civil War, including literacy tests as a prerequisite to voting.…
- 567 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted by Congress to address the high amount of racial discrimination in voting. It was an evil which had been perpetuated in many different parts of the United States through unremitting defiance of the Constitution. In Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, it contains the coverage formula that helps determine which states and local governments are subject to the pre-clearance under Section 5 of the Act. Section 5 of the Act contains the pre-clearance requirement that requires certain states and local governments to obtain a determination by the United States Attorney General, that changes made to their voting laws don’t deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
President Johnson signed the resulting legislation into law on August 6, 1965. Section 2 of the Act, which closely followed the language of the 15th amendment, applied a nationwide prohibition against the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on the literacy tests on a nationwide basis. Among its other provisions, the Act contained special enforcement provisions targeted at those areas of the country where Congress believed the potential for discrimination to be the greatest. Under Section 5, jurisdictions covered by these special provisions could not…
- 927 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Democracy is a foundation of a country’s success. The idea of mandatory voting goes against the democracy of the United States. Mandatory voting is a violation of our civil rights that might become a law in the United States. Although many believe that mandatory voting helps to strengthen a democratic government by increasing the number of voters, mandatory voting violates people’s freedom of choice in the United States.…
- 947 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays