Preview

Sectionalism In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sectionalism In The United States
Sectionalism refers to loyalty to a section, country, or a region as a whole. In America, sectionalism can be defined in terms of social structures, lifestyles, and the political values of the South and the North. It was heightened in the period beginning from 1800 to 1850 when the North was urbanized and industrialized with successful factories whereas in the South it was covered with agricultural plantations which were based on slave labor. The Southern communities tried to excuse the use of slaves with a claim that factory workers in the North toiled under similar or even worse conditions. Additionally, they also referred to Northern factory workers as white slaves. The North industrialist benefitted from the slave structures, but politicians and religious leaders were against it. However, the war between the …show more content…
Dred was a slave who pursued to acquire American citizenship by exploiting the legal systems. The Supreme Court judges denied his request stating that no individual with African blood could become a citizen of the United States (Epperson, 32). The same decision overruled the Missouri Compromise of the year 1820 which has constrained slavery in specific territories of the United States. Scott’s owners moved him from Illinois and then to Wisconsin, both of these areas were part of the Northwest region that had banned slavery. Therefore, when Scott made it back to Missouri he tried to buy his freedom, but his owner refused, leading him to seek help from the courts. The decision infuriated the Republicans since it rendered their attempts to end slavery to be futile. The ruling also affected the lives of the Northern Democrats who could no longer popularize sovereignty as a symbolic franchise to Southerners from the electorates of the North. The decision was more than preserving slavery, it also ventured into the issue of blacks gaining

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a Missouri slave. Sold to Army surgeon John Emerson in Saint Louis around 1833, Scott was taken to Illinois, a free State, and on to the free Wisconsin Territory before returning to Missouri. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott sued Emerson's widow for his freedom in the Missouri supreme court, claiming that his residence in the “free soil” of Illinois made him a free man. After defeat in State courts, Scott brought suit in a local federal court. Eleven years after Scott's initial suit, the case came before the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Monumental Court Cases

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. Dred Scott was a Missouri slave. Sold to Army surgeon John Emerson in Saint Louis around 1833, Scott was taken to Illinois, a free State, and on to the free Wisconsin Territory before returning to Missouri. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott sued Emerson's widow for his freedom in the Missouri supreme court, claiming that his residence in the “free soil” of Illinois made him a free man. After defeat in State courts, Scott brought suit in a local federal court. Eleven years after Scott's initial suit, the case came before the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision ruled taking a slave into a free territory did not grant him freedom. Thus the time Dred Scott spent away from Missouri did not change his slave status. The ruling also declared black men were not considered citizens of the country, therefore unable to bring a lawsuit. This court decision further stated Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories and in turn they ruled the Missouri Compromise unlawful. The ruling dragged the country into upheaval as could be seen on nearly every newspaper headline from coast to…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many times during our class discussions and lectures we tried to examine the stages leading up to the succession and Civil War in America. During the critical time period of the middle 19th century, the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision of the Supreme Court was one of those major treads on the pathway to secession. The man Dred Scott was taken to Missouri with Peter Blow as a slave from Virginia and sold. His new master from Missouri then moved to the free state of Illinois for a while, but later moved back to Missouri. Following his master 's passing, Scott asserted that since he had resided in a free state, he was inevitably a free citizen.…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was born into slavery around 1800 his first known owner was Peter Blow in 1830. Before Mr. Blow’s death in 1832, Dred Scott was sold to Dr. Emerson. In 1833 Dred Scott went with Dr. Emerson to Fort Armstrong in Illinois he was an assistant surgeon in the Army. Dr. Emerson was stationed there for three years and Dred Scott would have been entitled to sue for freedom, however…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, the North was manufacturing based while the South was agriculturally based meaning that it required the use of slaves. Throughout history there have been various disputes among the regions about the use of slavery.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although they still believed in keeping racism and segregation, the North still wanted to free slaves. Over time, the tension bubbled up so high that eventually, the country broke apart fighting. The fight was…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both the North and South had tried to resolve the issue of slavery on numerous occasions,…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave who sought citizenship through the American legal system, and whose case eventually ended up in the Supreme Court. The famous Dred Scott Decision in 1857 denied his request stating that no person with African blood could become a U.S. citizen. Besides denying citizenship for African-Americans, it also overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had restricted slavery in certain U.S. territories. This is the main cause because this is what's known as racism and racism started the problem with north and south. The Northern people were the ones who said no slavery is wrong and everyone is equal.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    dred scott

    • 1649 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott Decision." The case was based on the fact that although he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, they had lived with his slave owner, Dr. John Emerson, in states and territories where slavery was illegal according to both state laws and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, including Illinois and Minnesota. The United States Supreme Court decided 7–2 against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules. Moreover, Scott 's temporary residence outside Missouri did not bring about his emancipation under the Missouri Compromise, which the court ruled unconstitutional as it would improperly deprive Scott 's owner of his legal property.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Around 1820, during the time of the Missouri compromise, Dred Scott's owner Peter Blow took him to the newly formed slave state of Missouri. He was then sold to John Emerson, and was taken to Illinois. Which came into the Union in 1819 as a free state. Dred Scott was a slave in the free state for a short time, but then he was moved again to the Wisconsin Territory. According to the Missouri compromise, that territory also fell under the free land. In 1837 Emerson went back to Louisiana and left Dred Scott in the Wisconsin Territory. Emerson's wife Eliza leased out Dred Scott in Wisconsin, then later brought him back to Louisiana and then eventually to Missouri. Soon after, Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri State court case of Scott vs. Emerson. The court ruled that he would still have to be a slave because he was in a slave state. Eventually, He took his case to the supreme court. At this time his new owner was John Sandford, Eliza's brother. Thus, the Supreme Court case had began.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rebellion against slavery was made by the workers and farmers. The efforts of the bourgeoisie of the North could not accept the fact that the Central government in the United States was in the hands of slaveholders. Brewing a decisive clash between a progressive industrial North and a backward slaveholding South.2…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scott V. Sanford

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court in March 1857 was one of the major steps on the road to secession. Dred Scott was a slave who was taken to Missouri from Virginia and sold. His new master then moved to Illinois (a free state) for a while but soon moved back to Missouri. Upon his master's death, Scott claimed that since he had resided in a free state, he was consequentially a free man. The case eventually made it to the Supreme Court. As stated by Supreme Court Justice C. J. Taney, "In considering this...controversy, two questions arise: 1st was he sick, together with his family, free in Missouri by reason of his stay in the territory of the United States herein before mentioned? And second if they were not, is Scott himself free by reason of his removal to Rock Island, in the state of Illinois?" 1 Both of these questions led to an even greater and more central question: "Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guaranteed by that instrument to the citizen?" (i.e. does Scott, having been a slave, have the constitutional right to sue?) The Court's decision (7 against, 2 for) was declared on March 6, 1857.1…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays