Preview

How Did The Dred Scott's View Of Slavery

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Dred Scott's View Of Slavery
The Dred Scott decision was a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States decreeing all slaves to be property. As such, slaves were denied any and all rights given to citizens in the Constitution. Most importantly, the ruling determined Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery from westward expansion. This ruling created a pivotal point in the moral battlefield of slavery and its place in our country’s history. The decision polarized the population on the issue of slavery resulting in distinctive geographical ideologies. The South felt the ruling ended the issue of slavery completely, while the North felt threatened and helpless to the further spread of slavery. The Western territories felt a rising pressure to determine statehood …show more content…
He moved from master to master being sold several times. Scott did spend a large period of time owned by Dr. Emerson, an army surgeon. Dr. Emerson moved to Fort Armstrong in Illinois where at the time the state had recently declared itself free. This gave Dred Scott the opportunity to declare himself a free citizen. However, he never chose to pursue his freedom. Dred Scott moved around for years to different army locations with Dr. Emerson until the doctor’s death. After Emerson’s death Dred Scott and his family were left to his wife Irene. After three years of labor Dred Scott asked to buy his families freedom but was refused. Her refusal sparked Scott to sue Irene for his family’s freedom. The result was a lawsuit that went all the way to the Supreme Court. The Dred Scott decision ruled taking a slave into a free territory did not grant him freedom. Thus the time Dred Scott spent away from Missouri did not change his slave status. The ruling also declared black men were not considered citizens of the country, therefore unable to bring a lawsuit. This court decision further stated Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories and in turn they ruled the Missouri Compromise unlawful. The ruling dragged the country into upheaval as could be seen on nearly every newspaper headline from coast to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some consider Dred Scott not a citizen. The question has also been raised about the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise and whether it not infringes on an individual’s right to protect property which is written in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. What is considered a man or “men” in the Declaration of Independence is questioned and some justices ask if African Americans or those with slave roots are in the category of this people and if the equality guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Natural and Common Laws granted by the Constitution is applicable to African American men . The consistent racist rulings by the states courts and eventually the federal court have led to the escalation of the Dred Scott case to the Supreme…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the constitution did not provide a clear answer for deciding whether or not a slave had the same rights as a person. The federal government faced a divided country, and passed laws enforcing the return of slaves to their owner’s states, such as the Fugitive Slave Act. Contradicting this were “personal liberty laws,” which allowed states to decide who would be considered a person in their territory. However, both the Fugitive Slave Act and “personal liberty laws” were challenged in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. The ambiguity of the constitution would lead to a four-year-long war between the Northern and Southern states.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was born into slavery sometime in 1795, in Southampton County, Virginia. His actions helped him become a big part in how he shaped the court and slavery. When Dred scott was brought into free states while he was a slave he thought it to be wrong because they were free states. Dred scott argued they should restrict(to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity) the entrance of slave owners into free states if they have slaves with them, or that the slaves should be free if they enter a free state. This topic(a subject of conversation or discussion) made it up to the supreme court where Roger B. Taney(Chief justice of the supreme court) said that Dred Scott did not have any right to bring his…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the end Scott did get what he wanted not only for himself but his family. The case surrounding the debate was a heated topic. In regards to “The Question” the northern and southern states raised more. Being a slave and wanting freedom, especially in a free state should have happened.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today was the day of the Dred Scott case. I was very nervous for what would happen. I’m from Illinois which is known as a free state. And I traveled to Missouri to get the insider about the Dred Scott case. I believed slavery was morally wrong and want it to end more than anything. So I’m completely on Dred Scott’s side. When I arrived at the St. Louis’ Old Courthouse I became more nervous. There was a very low chance that Dred Scott would win this case considering it was packed with strangers who believed slavery was the right thing to do. Once the court began Dred Scott made the first statement stating, “I have spent nearly my whole life as a slave. My time of traveling to different locations sure does give me the right to emancipate. I…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emerson’s widow. The next year the Missouri Supreme Court Decide to retried the case. In an 1850 retrial the St. Louis court ruled that Scott and his family were free.” Two years later the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in again, reversing their decision.Scott and his lawyer the brought the case to to federal court. “In 1854, the circuit court upheld the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court.” “After losing again in the federal district court, they went to the Supreme court in Dred Scott v.s Sandford.”(Wikipedia) Dred Scott had an argument that since he was in Illinois on free soil he should become a free citizen.” (Wikipedia) Scott claimed that him and John Sanford, who lived in New York, were citizens from different states. “The justices of the Supreme Court were biased regarding slavery. Seven of them had been appointed by pro slavery presidents, and five were families the owned slaves.”…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court first heard the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who lived in Missouri with his owner. His owner took him to Illinois and Minnesota, two states that prohibited slavery. After the owner died, Scott proclaimed himself a free man and his family free due to the fact that he had resided on “free soil” for several years and that his four children had also been born on “free soil”. He sued the man’s widow and won and lost his case in several courts over an 11 year period. At this point in history, the Missouri Compromise had been in effect for about 40 years, but was never officially ruled on by the Supreme Court. Many Southerners were hoping that the Compromise be ruled unconstitutional due to the…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the june of 1847 Dred Scott went to court to get his freedom. His case failed because he couldn’t prove Mrs Emerson owned him. If Emerson’s Widow did not own him then now person owned Dred Scott. If no person owned Dred Scott the by definition Scott should have been declared a free man, The following year the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in to this situation. They decided it should be retried. The St Louis Circuit Court ruled that Scott and his family were free.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme Court decided the African people, whether free or slave, were not considered American citizens, and didn’t have the right to sue someone in federal court. During this case, the Court ruled that Congress didn’t have the power to ban slavery in territories. They also declared that the rights of slaveowners were protected by the Fifth Amendment in the Constitution. This is because slaves in their times were not considered people, they were considered as property.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott vs. Sanford court case was impacted by the Supreme Court. According to OUR DOCUMENTS "Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri, sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Debate for Freedom: The Dred Scott Decision The topic of slavery was a major reason for the Civil War. One of most well known trials is the Dread Scott Decision, he fought for years and had several trials before he was finally free. It takes a strong man to not give up on his dream. A dream that he would not live to see play out for many other slaves.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays