Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…
DRED Scott was a slave who was born in Southampton county, Virginia, United states in 1795. The importance of Dred Scott was that his case’s decision (Scott v Sanford) led to a court decision that helped to start the civil war. By deciding that Dred Scott cannot sue another citizen because he was a slave, it ended the hope the issue of slavery could be dealt with peacefully.…
Piercing the corporate veil describes a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders or directors. Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person, which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed. Common law countries usually uphold this principle of separate personhood, but in exceptional situations may "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil. A simple example would be where a businessman has left his job as a director and has signed a contract to not compete with the company he has just left for a period of time. If he set up a company which competed with his former company, technically it would be the company and not the person competing. But it is likely a court would say that the new company was just a "sham", a "fraud" or some other phrase,[1] and would still allow the old company to sue the man for breach of contract. A court would look beyond the "legal fiction" to the reality of the situation.…
A group of African-American youths were on a freight train through Alabama. They got into a fight with some white youths, throwing the white boys from the train. A message was sent, requesting all blacks be removed from the train. Two white girls on the train testified that they had been raped by six different youths in turn. The youths were taken into custody. The community was very hostile, as a mob met the youths. The trial judge appointed “all members of the bar” for the purpose of the arraignment. The defendants themselves were illiterate and “ignorant”. They were all tried separately, each trial lasting a day, convicted, and sentenced to death. Throughout the proceedings, none of the “Scottsboro” boys was allowed to contact their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their “clients.” All nine youths were found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.…
In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…
The Scottsboro Trials, which tried and unfairly convicted nine innocent black youths of raping two white females (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica), was a milestone in the African-American civil rights movement, primarily because of the way racism influenced the outcome of the trials. Firstly, the protests held against the convictions mobilized the movement for equal rights. This was illustrated on May 8th, 1933, ten years after the last notable African-American March on Washington, when upwards of 4,000 people marched in Washington, D.C. in a bid for freedom for the Scottsboro Boys (Simpson). This example proves that the outcome of the Scottsboro trials led to demonstrations that protested inequality and encouraged equal rights for all American citizens.…
Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…
Why is important to include operating employees (non-managers) in the development and use of incentive programs?…
Scan the case, looking for the main issues/problems to be solved. Then, read the case, taking detailed notes on information that will help you to solve the issue/problem. Next, determine between what the really important information is, and how it impacts on the issues/problems. Once you are certain that you know all the key information, discuss possible alternatives (not necessarily the same as the ones offered in the case). Select the best alternative, and then determine what the firm needs…
Dred Scott was a former slave that claimed he was a free man due to his master (deceased) taking him into free territory. The court decided that he was not technically a citizen, therefore he could not sue. This is the court decision that ultimately deemed all slaves as property, and guaranteed they had no rights and a white man didn’t have to respect them, as a free black or a slave. “In the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford(1857), the court ruled that even residence on free soil did not render a slave a free person, for, regardless of their status, black people had “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” (Jones 342)…
Imagine you are put on trial for a crime you didn't commit and the sentence is death. Imagine that you are tried over and over again, and each time you go back to death row. This became reality to nine young boys on March 25, 1931. When the Scottsboro boys were convicted, everyone involved was extremely happy. Yet when the boys persuaded the judges to have retrial after retrial, it became a mess. Despite the conflicting testimonies of the Scottsboro boys, Victoria Price, and Ruby Bates, the court was able to discern the truth and deliver justice to everyone surrounding the trial. The Scottsboro trials were important because the sixth and fourteenth Amendment was challenged and carried through and the evidence presented was undeniable.…
In this activity, you will solve a case out of your textbook, Managerial Accounting. The intent of the Case Studies is to show how to analyze module related managerial accounting financial data in an organizations setting. For this case study, you will be able to demonstrate your ability to correctly calculate costs using the high-low method and least-square method.…
Great post! and I’d enjoying reading your post. it is important to underscore the point that regardless of repayment programs, the supply chain/ marketing manager in charge of the rebate program must ensure that the selected program is prudently and meticulously selected, suitably executed, and effectually stalked to provide that sales revitalization cost-effectively. It is extremely important to note that the key to discount program success are good reclamation systems and courses that preserve clerical costs curtailed while congregation data that primes to superior customer intuition for forthcoming promotion prospects. Your thought!…
The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart is usually informative, comical, and humorous. The late night satirical program is seemingly at the direction of Stewart, making his job one to be envied. The Daily Show draws its satire and comedy from a host of sources including politics, media, news stories, and often draws comedy from aspects of the show itself. Stewart has been the host of the show since 1999 and has had the opportunity to meet numerous famous actors, musicians, political figures, and even the occasional fellow talk show host. The show usually opens with a long monologue from Stewart highlighting recent headlines. The second segment of the show typically showcases Stewart and his correspondents adopting a headline and taking exaggerated stances on opposite sides of the issue to better display an opinion, point, or fact. The last segment of Stewart’s show is devoted to celebrity interviews in which he usually makes the crowd, televised audience, and his own celebrity guest weep in laughter. Only on select occasions is Stewart clear, precise, and non-satirical. One such occasion took place during the housing market collapse in 2009. Stewart hosted Jim Cramer from CNBC’s Mad Money to comment on a few remarks a fellow correspondent at CNBC had made recently with respect to the housing market. During this celebrity interview Stewart highlights an ethical issue, questions Jim Cramer’s ethical responsibilities, and even shows anger toward Cramer for how he handled the situation.…
USA Today is a multi-platform news and information media company. Founded in 1982, USA Today 's mission is to serve as a forum for better understanding and unity to help make the USA truly one nation. Through its unique visual storytelling, USA Today delivers high-quality and engaging content across print, digital, social and video platforms. An innovator of news and information, USA Today reflects the pulse of the nation and serves as the host of the American conversation – today, tomorrow and for decades to follow. USA Today and USATODAY.com reach a combined seven million readers daily. Its a leader in mobile applications with more than 21 million downloads on mobile devices (www.usatoday.com).…