Preview

The Civil War: The Slavery Debate

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1093 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Civil War: The Slavery Debate
The American Civil War was a civil war fought between the North and the South or the Union and the Confederacy, respectably. This was fought to determine the integrity of the United States as it defeated the bid for independence by the autonomous Confederate States of America. War broke out in April of 1861, the Confederate armies attacked Fort Sumter, and the war was ended by the Confederate Armies surrendering in 1865. The slavery debate revolved around many vital issues. The slavery debate will be discussed through the growing friction between the Confederacy and the Union, the Compromise of 1850, the Dred Scott case, as well as the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
The Union was industrialized and had a much better economy, opposed to the Confederacy
…show more content…
Henry Clay came up with the first attempt at a solution for our nation’s problems. This solution was called the omnibus bill, his hope was that there would be enough support for each issue on the bill that it would be passed, but on the contrary there was far too much controversy. Congress was facing many issued that were sectionally based, and the biggest question that stood is if there would be a continuance of the slave trade to bring to Washington D.C… Daniel C. Calhoun wasn’t Clay’s biggest fan, and hated his bill proposal. He thought it was a way to end slavery in certain degrees, and simply just a way that the South could assert more political authority over this process. It was a new congressman, Stephen A. Douglas’ idea to take the omnibus bill apart, and introduces each issue as their own bill. His idea took hold, but left resentments and killed the Missouri Compromise. This made room for questions about the development of slavery and contained the keys to disunion the war. Overall the Compromise of 1850 was filled with conflict, and would eventually lead to the downward spiral to the Civil …show more content…
Dred Scott was a former slave that claimed he was a free man due to his master (deceased) taking him into free territory. The court decided that he was not technically a citizen, therefore he could not sue. This is the court decision that ultimately deemed all slaves as property, and guaranteed they had no rights and a white man didn’t have to respect them, as a free black or a slave. “In the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford(1857), the court ruled that even residence on free soil did not render a slave a free person, for, regardless of their status, black people had “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” (Jones 342) The Northerners believe this obliterated the state limits. “Even nonabolitionists had good reason to fear the long-term implications of the ruling, for it suggested that the institution of slavery was about to spill out of the confines of the South and into the rest of the country.” (Jones 342) This case severely changed our nation in the way that Americans thought of blacks free or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the constitution did not provide a clear answer for deciding whether or not a slave had the same rights as a person. The federal government faced a divided country, and passed laws enforcing the return of slaves to their owner’s states, such as the Fugitive Slave Act. Contradicting this were “personal liberty laws,” which allowed states to decide who would be considered a person in their territory. However, both the Fugitive Slave Act and “personal liberty laws” were challenged in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. The ambiguity of the constitution would lead to a four-year-long war between the Northern and Southern states.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An aggrieved South, fearful of being denied more slave states, threatened secession. Whigs led by Henry Clay and Daniel Webster and Democrats led by John C. Calhoun and Stephan A. Douglas engaged in intense negotiation in the chambers of Congress. Northern senators were willing to comply to the demands of the South so long as California’s identity as a free state was secured in the process. Among the many demands made by Southern senators was the issuing of a reinforced version of the 1793 Fugitive-Slave Law. Southern slave owners’ growing frustration with the increasing number of slave escapees and runaways on account of the Underground Railroad and other escape routes gave the ordeal of creating a stricter Fugitive-Slave Law great weight in what became the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion stated that because of Dred Scott’s race he was not a citizen and had no right to sue under the Constitution, in March of 1857. Stretching beyond the case of the moment, the court’s decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that had for nearly 40 years placed restrictions on slavery north of the parallel 36 degrees, 30 minutes, in the vast territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Scott’s abolitionist lawyers might have hoped for a landmark decision but not the one they got. The Supreme Court’s ruling galvanized the abolition movement and spurred Abraham Lincoln to publicly speak out against it, the event that led to the resurgence of his personal political career.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had a greater population which allowed them to outnumber the Confederates and have more support. They also had access to many more outside rescues that would be helpful. Having all of these external sources added a larger production of weapons and ammo, and other supplies needed. The Confederate warriors were fighting for white’s to stay free and black slavery. Robert E. Lee was the general leading the Confederates into war.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision of 1857 is one of the most famous Supreme Court decisions because it declared that slaves could never become citizens of the United States. The Court’s 6-3 decision stated that the Constitution could not protect blacks and “blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” Since slaves could never become citizens they had no right to sue and Dred Scott remained a slave. The courts reputation following this decision plummeted to an all time low in the North and now Republicans of the time viewed the court as controlled by the Slave Power.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After having freedom the Missouri Supreme Court reversed the decision of the previous court. Scot had too now take this to federal court to continue to fight for freedom which had been given then revoked. The North saw this as taking away a person's human rights. The south viewed this as a giant win for a twisted ideology. The circuit court upheld the Missouri supreme court's decision. Now the final frontier was…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Calhoun believed Jefferson had been influenced by these principles of inalienable rights. As a result, according to Calhoun, Natural law “…caused him to take an utterly false view of the subordinate relationship of the black to the white race” (Calhoun, Oregon Bill, 1948). In particular he blamed Jefferson for the application of natural liberty to national policies of westward expansion. He criticized Jefferson for authoring the North West Ordinance which banned slavery in the Ohio territories which Calhoun saw as a byproduct of his subscription to natural rights. “To this political error, his proposition to exclude slavery from territory northwest of the Ohio may be traced…and through it the deep and dangerous agitation which now threatens to engulf [the nation]…”(Calhoun, Oregon Bill, 1948). Calhoun attributed the North West Ordinance as setting a national precedent for the exclusion of slavery in northern territories. Consequently this precedent then impacted the tradition of admitting new states formed by the Missouri Compromise and led to antislavery provision in the Oregon Bill. In Calhoun’s view preventing the extension of slavery and encouraging natural rights would disrupt the political order and lead to anarchy. To illustrate his point he argued that events like the French…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme Court decided the African people, whether free or slave, were not considered American citizens, and didn’t have the right to sue someone in federal court. During this case, the Court ruled that Congress didn’t have the power to ban slavery in territories. They also declared that the rights of slaveowners were protected by the Fifth Amendment in the Constitution. This is because slaves in their times were not considered people, they were considered as property.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the 1800s, the thing which was on everyone’s mind was the matter of slavery. In the not-too-old country of America, the North was against it and the South was for it. This eventually caused the Civil War. Before that, the nation was still trying to not split down the middle. One of the ways they did this was with the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a person that sued for his freedom. In 1847 Dred Scott first went to trial to sue for his freedom. Ten years after the case was brought before the United States Supreme Court the Court decided that all people of African Ancestry slaves as well as all free slave could never become a citizen of the United States. they couldn't sue in federal Court and The United States Supreme Court also ruled that the federal Court did not have the power to permit slavery in its territories.…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union had a significantly larger population than the Confederacy. The Union had a population over 22 million people while the Confederacy had 9 million. The Union had a well organized government. The government was already establishment and experienced. They had an easier…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    - For a majority of northerners, the most outrageous part of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott case was that Congress had never had the power to prohibit slavery in any territory.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays