Preview

Argumentative Essay: The Dred Scott Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: The Dred Scott Case
In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    AP Gov Court Cases
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    AP Gov Court Cases

    Ogden was running a ferry service and tried to keep Gibbons’ service out of New York waters, citing that navigation was not commerce. Failed, Gibbons sued for entry. Dred Scott vs. Sanford – 1857, Declared that since Dred Scott was a slave, he couldn’t even bring the case to court, and also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott Case: Chief Justice Roger B. Taney
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Dred Scott Case: Chief Justice Roger B. Taney

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case: Long Road To Freedom
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott Case: Long Road To Freedom

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Dred Scotts Gain Their Freedom?
    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Did Dred Scotts Gain Their Freedom?

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Research Paper
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott Case Research Paper

    Today was the day of the Dred Scott case. I was very nervous for what would happen. I’m from Illinois which is known as a free state. And I traveled to Missouri to get the insider about the Dred Scott case. I believed slavery was morally wrong and want it to end more than anything. So I’m completely on Dred Scott’s side. When I arrived at the St. Louis’ Old Courthouse I became more nervous. There was a very low chance that Dred Scott would win this case considering it was packed with strangers who believed slavery was the right thing to do. Once the court began Dred Scott made the first statement stating, “I have spent nearly my whole life as a slave. My time of traveling to different locations sure does give me the right to emancipate. I…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Trial Of James Bain
    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Argumentative Essay: The Trial Of James Bain

    On the dusk of March 4, 1974, an African American by the name of James Bain is convicted of raping a nine-year-old boy at a baseball field in Lake Wales, Florida. The victim reported that the offender was 17 or 18 years old and had bushy sideburns. After police revealed photographs of six potential suspects, only two of them had sideburns. On the grounds that James Bain has side burns, he was interrogated around midnight the next day. Upon interrogation, Bain declared that he was watching television on the night of the attack. Even with an alibi backed by his sister, the police still arrested him. On the day of the trail, the FBI presented the victim's underwear that contained the rapist’s semen. Although they had the semen of the rapist, DNA…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Monumental Court Cases
    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Monumental Court Cases

    2. Dred Scott was a Missouri slave. Sold to Army surgeon John Emerson in Saint Louis around 1833, Scott was taken to Illinois, a free State, and on to the free Wisconsin Territory before returning to Missouri. When Emerson died in 1843, Scott sued Emerson's widow for his freedom in the Missouri supreme court, claiming that his residence in the “free soil” of Illinois made him a free man. After defeat in State courts, Scott brought suit in a local federal court. Eleven years after Scott's initial suit, the case came before the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis
    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

    In Dred Scott v. Sandford the case started in 1856 and ended in 1857. “The Supreme Court decided that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.” - Alex McBride (McBride 2006, 411). The verdict was unlawful and absurd.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Dred Scott's View Of Slavery
    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Dred Scott's View Of Slavery

    The Dred Scott decision ruled taking a slave into a free territory did not grant him freedom. Thus the time Dred Scott spent away from Missouri did not change his slave status. The ruling also declared black men were not considered citizens of the country, therefore unable to bring a lawsuit. This court decision further stated Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories and in turn they ruled the Missouri Compromise unlawful. The ruling dragged the country into upheaval as could be seen on nearly every newspaper headline from coast to…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5 Main Events Leading Up To The Civil War
    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5 Main Events Leading Up To The Civil War

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scott V. Sandford Analysis
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scott V. Sandford Analysis

    On the off chance that Scott was not a U.S. Native, he couldn't sue in federal court, and the case would along these lines have been improvidently conceded. Be that as it may, Taney was resolved to force a legal arrangement on the subjection debate. Albeit later courts would embrace the arrangement of choosing constitutional inquiries on the tightest conceivable grounds, the pre-civil war courts regularly chose all issues that could bolster their decisions. Accordingly Taney kept, holding that Scott had never been free and that congress had truth be told surpassed its power in the Missouri compromise since it had no energy to disallow or cancel subjection in the domains. The Missouri compromise, which had served as the acknowledged constitutional settlement for about four decades, in this manner, fell. Indeed, even the tenet of "prevalent sway" as explained in the Kansas-Nebraska act, whereby the general population of every federal domain would have the ability to choose whether the region would enter the union as a free or a slave state—needed constitutional authenticity, as indicated by Taney. He in this way voided the standards of free soil, regional power, and for sure every part of abolitionist constitutional…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott´s fight for freedom
    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott´s fight for freedom

    Dred Scott was a person that sued for his freedom. In 1847 Dred Scott first went to trial to sue for his freedom. Ten years after the case was brought before the United States Supreme Court the Court decided that all people of African Ancestry slaves as well as all free slave could never become a citizen of the United States. they couldn't sue in federal Court and The United States Supreme Court also ruled that the federal Court did not have the power to permit slavery in its territories.…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Trayvon Martin
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Trayvon Martin

    On the night of February 28, 2012 Trayvon Martin was walking through a neighborhood from a convenience store. He was carrying an Arizona tea and a pack of skittles. This neighborhood had been having someone invading their homes. George Zimmerman saw him walking and called the police. They told him not to follow the suspicious person and officers were on their way. He didn’t listen and got out of his car. Him and Martin got into an argument. During the argument, Trayvon was fatally shot by Zimmerman.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Essay
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Essay

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Emmett Till
    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Emmett Till

    “It was down in Mississippi no so long ago, when a young boy from Chicago town stepped through a Southern door. This boy 's dreadful tragedy I can still remember well,…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More