Preview

The Dred Scott Case: Chief Justice Roger B. Taney

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
213 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Dred Scott Case: Chief Justice Roger B. Taney
When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.

On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney stated that Dred Scott had no right to bring a law suit in Federal Court, because the Constitution only afforded that right to U.S. citizens. Since Scott was a slave, he was not a citizen. He went
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    AP Gov Court Cases
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    AP Gov Court Cases

    Ogden was running a ferry service and tried to keep Gibbons’ service out of New York waters, citing that navigation was not commerce. Failed, Gibbons sued for entry. Dred Scott vs. Sanford – 1857, Declared that since Dred Scott was a slave, he couldn’t even bring the case to court, and also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sanford Case Summary
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sanford Case Summary

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary

    List the names of the Justices who voted with the majority and 3 important reasons from their “opinion”Taney, Wayne, Carton, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, CampbellBecause Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. No one but a citizen of the United States could be a citizen of a state, and that only Congress could confer national citizenship|…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary
    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary

    Some consider Dred Scott not a citizen. The question has also been raised about the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise and whether it not infringes on an individual’s right to protect property which is written in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. What is considered a man or “men” in the Declaration of Independence is questioned and some justices ask if African Americans or those with slave roots are in the category of this people and if the equality guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Natural and Common Laws granted by the Constitution is applicable to African American men . The consistent racist rulings by the states courts and eventually the federal court have led to the escalation of the Dred Scott case to the Supreme…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    DRED SCOTT V. Sandfrid 1856
    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. Sandfrid 1856

    United States Supreme Court DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD, (1856) No. 38 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1856 [60 U.S. 393, 396] THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit Court by Scott against Sandford. Prior to the institution of the present suit, an action was brought by Scott for his freedom in the Circuit Court of St. Louis county, (State court,) where there was a verdict and judgment in his favor.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case: Long Road To Freedom
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott Case: Long Road To Freedom

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott Pros And Cons
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Dred Scott Pros And Cons

    Dred Scott was born into slavery sometime in 1795, in Southampton County, Virginia. His actions helped him become a big part in how he shaped the court and slavery. When Dred scott was brought into free states while he was a slave he thought it to be wrong because they were free states. Dred scott argued they should restrict(to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity) the entrance of slave owners into free states if they have slaves with them, or that the slaves should be free if they enter a free state. This topic(a subject of conversation or discussion) made it up to the supreme court where Roger B. Taney(Chief justice of the supreme court) said that Dred Scott did not have any right to bring his…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Study
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Study

    When Europeans began colonizing in the New World, there was a large amount of work to do and very few workers to get the job done. While there were indentured servants paying their way to America in exchange for work, it was not enough. To solve this problem, Dutch ships began loading Africans against their will onto a boat to be slaves in the New World. This later became known as the Atlantic Slave Trade. After the American Revolution, slavery became less and less profitable especially in the North. Once the cotton gin was invented, more labor to work the fields in the South was needed. This made the American economy dependent upon slavery. There was much debate about the ethics of slavery and many thought it to be wrong. In 1857, the United States Supreme Court case of “Dred Scott v. Sandford” took place that changed America as we know it. This case brought up the issues of slavery and the future of the US. It brought to light the important responsibility politicians have in making important decisions that can affect the future. A…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Boo Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case
    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Boo Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case

    Unfortunately, Scott lost in his first trial due to lack of evidence. Scott, determined to win his freedom, was given a chance for a second trial. His main argument against Sanford was Sanford’s violation of Scott’s Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment states that a person’s life, liberty, or property cannot be taken away without due process of law. They were taking away Scott’s liberty, but he deserved to be free because he was taken to a free state. Although Scott won the second trial, his freedom was short-lived. Sanford’s sister, Mrs. Emerson, appealed the court’s decision leading to the case being brought to the Missouri Supreme Court. Sanford argued that Scott did not have rights as a US Citizen because he was a slave. As a slave owner, Sanford argued that slaves are a man’s property, and cannot be taken away…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Research Paper
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott Case Research Paper

    Today was the day of the Dred Scott case. I was very nervous for what would happen. I’m from Illinois which is known as a free state. And I traveled to Missouri to get the insider about the Dred Scott case. I believed slavery was morally wrong and want it to end more than anything. So I’m completely on Dred Scott’s side. When I arrived at the St. Louis’ Old Courthouse I became more nervous. There was a very low chance that Dred Scott would win this case considering it was packed with strangers who believed slavery was the right thing to do. Once the court began Dred Scott made the first statement stating, “I have spent nearly my whole life as a slave. My time of traveling to different locations sure does give me the right to emancipate. I…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott Supreme Court Case Analysis
    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page

    Dred Scott Supreme Court Case Analysis

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis
    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

    In Dred Scott v. Sandford the case started in 1856 and ended in 1857. “The Supreme Court decided that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.” - Alex McBride (McBride 2006, 411). The verdict was unlawful and absurd.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Significance And Background Of The Dred Scott Case
    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page

    Significance And Background Of The Dred Scott Case

    This article talks about the significance and background of the Dred Scott case. In fact this actually hurt the cause of anti-slavery because now, slavery could spread into the free states. Now, the free states laws that used to create this safe haven for the fugitive slaves, now no longer have any power because the Constitution, debatably the strongest document the United States has, contradicts any law protecting slaves. This is because the United States Constitution protects all property of the individual, and slaves to the southern people in the 1850’s thought of slaves as property.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case
    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott V. Sandford Case

    The process began in 1846: Scott lost in his initial suit in a local St. Louis district court, but he won in a second trial, only to have that decision overturned by the Missouri State Supreme Court. With support from local abolitionists, Scott filed another suit in federal court in 1854, against John Sanford, the widow Emerson's brother and executor of his estate. When that case was decided in favor of Sanford, that Scott turned to the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement
    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement

    Slaves were not intended to be included under the word “citizens” in the Constitution and thus can claim none of those rights. Dred Scott was not a citizen of Missouri within the meaning of the Constitution and therefore is not entitled to sue.…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More