Preview

Boo Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
688 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Boo Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case
Dred Scott vs Sanford
By Peter Clemente
Dred Scott was an African American man born into slavery who made history by using the US legal system to fight for his right t freedom. Scott was born in Southampton County, Virginia around 1800. Like many slaves, Scott dreamed of freedom and equality for himself and all slaves. But the 1800s were difficult years for slaves. They were mistreated, neglected and considered the property of their owners who could do with them whatever they pleased.
Being born into slavery meant that Scott could be passed around from owner to owner. His first owner, Peter Blow, treated him fairly and took him along as his family relocated from Virginia, to Alabama, and then Missouri. After Peter Blow’s death, Scott was sold to John Emerson, a US Army doctor. After serving the Emerson’s for a few years, Dr. Emerson gave Scott to his wife’s brother, John Sanford. Scott tried to buy his freedom away from Dr. Emerson’s wife but she would not accept that. Since Scott had spent time living in Illinois, a free state, he pursued his right to sue Sanford for his freedom. Scott was assisted at the time by a group of antislavery lawyers.
Unfortunately, Scott lost in his first trial due to lack of evidence. Scott, determined to win his freedom, was given a chance for a second trial. His main argument against Sanford was Sanford’s violation of Scott’s Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment states that a person’s life, liberty, or property cannot be taken away without due process of law. They were taking away Scott’s liberty, but he deserved to be free because he was taken to a free state. Although Scott won the second trial, his freedom was short-lived. Sanford’s sister, Mrs. Emerson, appealed the court’s decision leading to the case being brought to the Missouri Supreme Court. Sanford argued that Scott did not have rights as a US Citizen because he was a slave. As a slave owner, Sanford argued that slaves are a man’s property, and cannot be taken away

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    . Scott's extended stay in Illinois, a free state, gave him the legal standing to make a claim for freedom2.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney stated that Dred Scott had no right to bring a law suit in Federal Court, because the Constitution only afforded that right to U.S. citizens. Since Scott was a slave, he was not a citizen. He went…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the excerpt, "A Troublesome Property: Master-Slave Relations in Florida, 1821-1865, the author, Larry Rivers, focuses on the interaction between bondsmen and masters in Florida. It entails the theory that the master might claim the body of his property but could never quite dominate his or her soul. The state of Florida was one that differed in several aspects from other states in the old south which it made known as a free state. There were no slave laws and thus, it was considered a safe haven for many runaway slaves and the Seminole Indians. Due to the fact that there were no slave laws, the slaves often rebelled against their masters. As a result of such rebellions, there was a discipline problem that led many owners to perceive their slaves as “a troublesome property.” The three areas that the slaves had trouble with their owners were religious behavior, interpersonal relations, and work.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision would directly affect her, because of the fact that the decision was still valid, and she, along with all the other slaves, weren’t protected by the U.S. Constitution, and were not considered U.S. citizens. This ruled out any argument that John Jameson, and the rest of her defense, would come up with arguing her constitutional rights. Instead, they brought up things like, how it would’ve been possible for her to kill a man of…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott made history by launching a legal battle to gain his freedom. That he had lived with Dr. Emerson in free territories become the basis for his case.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the off chance that Scott was not a U.S. Native, he couldn't sue in federal court, and the case would along these lines have been improvidently conceded. Be that as it may, Taney was resolved to force a legal arrangement on the subjection debate. Albeit later courts would embrace the arrangement of choosing constitutional inquiries on the tightest conceivable grounds, the pre-civil war courts regularly chose all issues that could bolster their decisions. Accordingly Taney kept, holding that Scott had never been free and that congress had truth be told surpassed its power in the Missouri compromise since it had no energy to disallow or cancel subjection in the domains. The Missouri compromise, which had served as the acknowledged constitutional settlement for about four decades, in this manner, fell. Indeed, even the tenet of "prevalent sway" as explained in the Kansas-Nebraska act, whereby the general population of every federal domain would have the ability to choose whether the region would enter the union as a free or a slave state—needed constitutional authenticity, as indicated by Taney. He in this way voided the standards of free soil, regional power, and for sure every part of abolitionist constitutional…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his life he faced many challenges and it was definetly rough. Dred Scott was born into Slavery. He was born in about 1799, in Southampton County, Virginia. He was a hard worker and always fought for what he believed in. He died nine months after the Missouri Supreme Court Reversed their decision to grant him freedom. He fought for ten years in court…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays