Preview

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dred Scott V. Sandford Case
Dred Scott made history by launching a legal battle to gain his freedom. That he had lived with Dr. Emerson in free territories become the basis for his case.

The process began in 1846: Scott lost in his initial suit in a local St. Louis district court, but he won in a second trial, only to have that decision overturned by the Missouri State Supreme Court. With support from local abolitionists, Scott filed another suit in federal court in 1854, against John Sanford, the widow Emerson's brother and executor of his estate. When that case was decided in favor of Sanford, that Scott turned to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In December 1856, Abraham Lincoln delivered a speech, foreshadowing the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, examining the constitutional implications of the Dred Scott Case.
…show more content…
Sandford was issued, 11 long years after the initial suits. Seven of the nine judges agreed with the outcome delivered by Chief Justice Roger Taney, who announced that slaves were not citizens of the United States and therefore had no rights to sue in Federal courts: "... They had no rights which the white man was bound to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    . The Missouri Supreme Court decided that case should be retried. In an 1850 retrial, the St Louis circuit court ruled that Scott and his family were free.3.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney stated that Dred Scott had no right to bring a law suit in Federal Court, because the Constitution only afforded that right to U.S. citizens. Since Scott was a slave, he was not a citizen. He went…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction- The population of a black male was 14.6% in 1964 and the white male population with a high school diploma was was 27.6%.It all started with the civil rights movement which was a movement so blacks can have the same privileges as whites. It was wrong that they had to separate people because of there color back then. Body Paragraph 1-The fist case is Dred Scott vs Sanford which was a judgement for the slave named Dred Scott and his wife Harriet sued for their freedom in a St. Louis citycourt.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buchanan V. Warley

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case was the first to be brought to Supreme Court by the newly organized civil rights organization, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Moorfield Storey argued the case for Buchanan. This case was of course odd. Buchanan, a white man, was suing Warley, a black, to force him to buy a house in a mainly…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, Scott lost in his first trial due to lack of evidence. Scott, determined to win his freedom, was given a chance for a second trial. His main argument against Sanford was Sanford’s violation of Scott’s Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment states that a person’s life, liberty, or property cannot be taken away without due process of law. They were taking away Scott’s liberty, but he deserved to be free because he was taken to a free state. Although Scott won the second trial, his freedom was short-lived. Sanford’s sister, Mrs. Emerson, appealed the court’s decision leading to the case being brought to the Missouri Supreme Court. Sanford argued that Scott did not have rights as a US Citizen because he was a slave. As a slave owner, Sanford argued that slaves are a man’s property, and cannot be taken away…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Dred Scott v. Sandford the case started in 1856 and ended in 1857. “The Supreme Court decided that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.” - Alex McBride (McBride 2006, 411). The verdict was unlawful and absurd.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1847, the St. Louis courthouse ruled against Scott but he was given the right to a second trial. In 1850, in the second trial, the jury decided that the Scotts should be freed. Mrs. Emerson did not want to lose the Scotts, so she appealed her case to the Missouri State Supreme Court. The Missouri State Supreme Court reversed the decision in 1852. In St. Louis Federal Court, Dred Scott sued Mrs. Emerson’s brother, John Sanford. The Court ruled in favor of Sanford. Dred Scott appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by Abraham Lincoln in 1863. It was issued during the time of the Civil War, which was a war between the North and South in a disagreement over slavery. Lincoln used the War to his advantage by issuing the emancipation as a war aim to preserve the union. In the document Lincoln declares “ including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom”, to reassure people that the purpose of the emancipation is not to necessary free slaves but to use them in the military.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was when Dred Scott, an African American slave who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. This was an important decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court said that African Americans could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States. The Supreme Court hoped this would set a precedent and end the slavery debate forever. This is an example of how even if the United States would have tried to just sign a bill to end slavery, the supreme court may have just said it was unconstitutional and vetoed it using the checks and balances…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bill of Rights

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Case between Dred Scott v. Sanford was a had a showed how much of an impact the amendments had on shaping America. In 1857 Dred Scott, an African-American slaves, was taken by his master, officer of the U.S. Army, the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin. He lived on free soil for a long period. When the Army ordered his master to return to the state of Missouri, he took Scott with him to the slave state, where his master died back. In 1846, Scott helped the death penalty lawyers to sue for his freedom in court, claiming he should be free because he had lived on free soil for a long period. The case went to the Supreme Court of the United States. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Tani was a former slave owner from Maryland. In March 1857 in Scott lost seven of nine justices of the Supreme Court declared no slave or…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Declaration of Independence, the words “Men” or “Citizens” do not apply to slaves. They were seen as property to the supporters of slavery. South Carolina, at the time of signing the Declaration of Independence, opposed to having the word “slavery” in the document because they wanted and needed the use of slaves for work. This consideration was confirmed in the case of Dred Scott. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived with his owner in a free state before returning to the slave state of Missouri, had brought this case to the court. He argued that spending time in a free state made him a free man. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney disagreed to Scott’s statement. Taney was a supporter of slavery so he stated "it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration....”” declared African Americans were not protected under the Declaration of Independence since they were not citizens. Slaves were property so The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was seen as unconstitutional. After this case, in 1862, the Confiscation Acts were passed which permitted the confiscation of property,…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays