Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Bill of Rights

Better Essays
1802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bill of Rights
Today marks the 300th anniversary of the ratification Constitution and the bill of rights. To celebrate this day we are going to look through the years on how these documents helped create the identity of America. National governments and the state of the specific duties and powers as well as sharing the same laws, not laws adopted in accordance with the Constitution, the supreme law of the country. Creating three distinct branches; the legislative, executive and judicial. Each branch has specific powers to check at the same time capable of the powers of the other two branches. The government has to meet the legal, tax and laws. It judicial system has been constructed in which the Supreme Court of the United States has the last word on the laws .System of checks and balances between the three branches of power are combined in accordance with the Constitution and the legislature has been truly representative body of the people. An important feature of the Constitution is that it is constantly adapting to the times and has the ability to be amended so it would never be stuck in the past.
The Case between Dred Scott v. Sanford was a had a showed how much of an impact the amendments had on shaping America. In 1857 Dred Scott, an African-American slaves, was taken by his master, officer of the U.S. Army, the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin. He lived on free soil for a long period. When the Army ordered his master to return to the state of Missouri, he took Scott with him to the slave state, where his master died back. In 1846, Scott helped the death penalty lawyers to sue for his freedom in court, claiming he should be free because he had lived on free soil for a long period. The case went to the Supreme Court of the United States. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Tani was a former slave owner from Maryland. In March 1857 in Scott lost seven of nine justices of the Supreme Court declared no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen or have been a citizen of the United States. As a non-citizen, the court stated, Scott had no rights and could not sue in federal court and must remain a slave. At the time, there were about 4 million slaves in America. The court's decision has affected all slaves and African-Americans in the United States. The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress could not stop slavery in emerging regions and declared the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional. Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery north of 36 ° 30 'in the Louisiana Purchase. The court, he found against the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits Congress from depriving property without due process. Anti-slavery leaders in the North led to a controversial decision of the Supreme Court as evidence that Southerners to extend slavery throughout the country and eventually manage the nation itself wanted. Southerners approved the Dred Scott decision believing Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories. Abraham Lincoln reacted with disgust at the decision and was spurred into political action, speaking publicly against them. In general, the Dred Scott decision affect the development of social and political divide between the North and the South and the nation took over the brink of civil war.
In Cleveland, Ohio, the three members of the local police arrived at the apartment to search got to find a property where you want bomb suspect was hiding in the house, the plaintiff, Mapp was performed, and his daughter, who both lived in the second floor of two family home. According to the staff, they received information that someone was hiding in the house wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing. To find knock and ask to enter the premises, Miss Mapp denied the request. Officials said their dominant situation at hand, and waited able to monitor the inside of the residence. A few hours later, the police tried to house a second time after an additional period of four police backup arrived on the scene. At that time Miss Mapp refused to even open the door, and they broke into the house through physical force. Miss Mapp lawyer came to the residence, the police would not let him, and yet they allow him to see the search warrant. While Miss Mapp continued questioning of officials of the arrest warrant, the officer quickly broke a piece of paper on which Miss Mapp grabbed a sheet of paper and began to hide in the trunk. This led to a conflict between the officers and Miss Mapp, which eventually led to Miss Mapp, is currently held in custody and handcuffed on the ground that his uncooperative and responsible for safety at risk. Handcuffs, Miss Mapp was taken on the second floor of his house. Then the staff began to look in dresser, wardrobe, look for bags and other personal items. Research continues into the chamber of a minor, and then into the living room, kitchen and dining room. Then they are scanned into the basement, where the strain was found, it was listed as obscene. If taken to court, the warrant was not ever be produced or prove their real existence. But despite this, the Court noted that the evidence admitted. The Court referred the Evidence in relation to the use of force The question whether evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment is admissible in court. Under the law, people have the right under the Fourth Amendment illegal search and seizure must be protected and secure in their persons, places and things. The decision of the Court Clark wrote for the majority. Materials that were submitted as evidence to prosecute Miss Mapp was obtained in later as an illegal search of the residence of the accused. The police broke the door of the house and entered the suspects were in the survey, which has never been found in Miss Mapp setting to find. During the search, the accused was in a physical fight with the police, and they arrested. He explained that the injury "personal security and personal liberty" constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Research that was allegedly given to find the suspect, was not in boxes, bags, and other areas of the plaintiff that the searches were conducted.-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

The most recent showing of how the constitution and the bill of rights is continuing to shape the United States of America. In the year 2064, China grew impatient and demanded that the United States of America to pay off its debts or else China would cut of trade with the States. U.S reacted to this by nationalizing Iraq’s oil supply. Iraq was now considered a state of the U.S. The transition however was very complicating and implementing the constitution and the bill of rights to the citizens of Iraq. During this time, there was an increase in child labour in Iraq. Here is where the 13th amendment comes into play. Enforcing the 13th amendment in Iraq would cost many slave owners lots of profits that they would get from the labour and they would most likely be trialed and put into prison. One child labour ringleader, Malik Zaid, was arrested for running one of the largest child labour services in Iraq. He was trialed in Iraq under the newly implemented U.S laws and was sentenced to life in prison. This created other slave owners to either go into hiding and shut down their business or fight back against the amendment in hope to create a 28th amendment allowing for slavery. Led by Rahim Ibrahim was protest and riots to get the 28th amendment ratified. The Iraq citizens were new to the whole process it takes for a bill to ratify and grew impatient. Ibrahim created a militia and threated to start a civil war. The President at the time Ian Samuel did not take Ibrahim seriously because America still has to pay off the debt owed to china and did not have time to deal with Ibrahim. So, with little interference from the government and the fact that Ibrahim’s opposed 28th amendment has yet to be ratified, Ibrahim felt that he was not being taking seriously and got help from his allies from other countries. Militia leader of the “Kozak” in Russia Vladimir Kozlov was one of Ibrahim’s unusual allies. He and Ibrahim ordered their men to a surprise attack on a major oil drilling site in Iraq. Over 500,000 gallons of oil was lost that day and Ibrahim was not done wreaking havoc yet. He and Kozlov started kidnapping men, women, and children all over Iraq to put in their labour factories. Now President Samuel had enough and sent out 200,000 troops on a mission to arrest and capture Ibrahim at his centre of operations in Krekaran. The attack was a blood bath as Samuel not being a very military literate president, did not have a very good plan of attack losing more than 100 soldiers in the fight. In the end Ibrahim was arrested and sentenced to life in prison, Kozlov fled back to hiding in Russia, and the slaves where sent free back to their lives. Till this day, America has yet to pay off its debt to China but China is still trading with America. The Constitution, was intended to provide America with a government system not only a solid foundation for the management of checks and balances, the government does not have too, but if the Bill of Rights, and is also designed to protect people against the government overzealous people in great fear immediately after the Revolution and the separation from the mother in England. Firstly, in accordance with the Articles of Confederation, the rights of individual components were not protected, and left to the states, and products simply explains the intergovernmental relations and the creation of the Congress of the United States, unable to meet the need for a strong army, as opposed to state militial forces, and the need for a central government in a position of tax legislation and the settlement of international disputes. Needs of people and the pain of the Constitution was created. Most states, however, refused to sign the Declaration of the Rights of the front, the other provided several alleged that the Bill of Rights be added soon made. It was a constant topic of debate recently whether individual states should establish laws to protect their personal specific components, or when the Bill of Rights should continue to be established to protect all citizens of the United States before the loss of rights.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was born into slavery sometime in 1795, in Southampton County, Virginia. His actions helped him become a big part in how he shaped the court and slavery. When Dred scott was brought into free states while he was a slave he thought it to be wrong because they were free states. Dred scott argued they should restrict(to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity) the entrance of slave owners into free states if they have slaves with them, or that the slaves should be free if they enter a free state. This topic(a subject of conversation or discussion) made it up to the supreme court where Roger B. Taney(Chief justice of the supreme court) said that Dred Scott did not have any right to bring his…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the most significant documents in modern world history. Its official date of adoption was on the seventeenth of September in 1897. The Constitution itself represents the advent of democracy, justice and freedom in a once-was colony which thereafter gained its independence. It established three branches of government; the legislative branch, the judicial branch and the executive branch. Additionally, the Constitution outlined the relationship between the country’s citizens and the Federal government.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court first heard the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who lived in Missouri with his owner. His owner took him to Illinois and Minnesota, two states that prohibited slavery. After the owner died, Scott proclaimed himself a free man and his family free due to the fact that he had resided on “free soil” for several years and that his four children had also been born on “free soil”. He sued the man’s widow and won and lost his case in several courts over an 11 year period. At this point in history, the Missouri Compromise had been in effect for about 40 years, but was never officially ruled on by the Supreme Court. Many Southerners were hoping that the Compromise be ruled unconstitutional due to the…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Dred Scott case was a landmark case that sparked uproar from state officials after Chief Justice Taney gave the majority opinion of the court. Dred Scott was a slave owned by an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, with whom Scott traveled to the free state of Illinois. Following a two and a half year stay in Illinois, Scott and his master moved to Wisconsin, also a free state. However, Scott’s extended stay in Illinois gave him the power to make a legal standing to request his freedom, however Scott never followed through possibly due to his ignorance of the statute. After Emerson’s death, Scott was hired out to an army captain, which then prompted Scott to request his freedom. In June of 1847, Dred Scott went to trial in order to legally win…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dred Scott, originally a slave in Missouri, had been taken by his owner, John Emerson, into Illinois, where slavery had been prohibited by the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, and into the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise. After his return to Missouri, Scott brought suit against Emerson 's widow, claiming that he was free by reason of his residence in free territory. The Missouri Supreme Court ruled against him, but after his ownership was transferred to Mrs. Emerson 's brother, John F. A. Sanford of New York, Scott brought a similar suit in federal court. The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) held that a black slave could not become a citizen under the U.S. Constitution based on that Scott had not become free by virtue of his residence in a territory covered by the Missouri Compromise, since that legislation was unconstitutional. This was viewed as a proslavery decision by the abolitionists, and the case probably hastened the coming of the Civil War. That issue aside, it was the second time that the Court had declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, the first having occurred 54 years earlier, in Marbury vs. Madison.…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time around the dred scott cases slavery was banned in some states via the missouri compromise. Dred Scott had been living in along with his family had lived in a U.S territory where slavery was banned. Scott argued that since he had lived in that territory for a while that he and his family should have ultimately been granted freedom. Dred Scott also tried to sue for the wages that had been held from him while the case had been in motion which ended in the court ruling in favor of John Sanford.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Declaration Of Rights

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our founding fathers who wrote the United States Declaration of Independence and the Preamble of the Constitution carefully chose the words that they connected with the rights that United States citizens would be granted so that the rights could still be applied in today’s society. Some of the phrases and words that were chosen for the Declaration of Independence and the Preamble include the right to unalienable rights, to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, promote general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bill of right

    • 896 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Only SI, DI and BX can be used inside [ ] from memory addressing point of view. From…

    • 896 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays