Emerson’s wife retained scott as her now property. Scott offered to buy his freedom from Mrs Emerson for three-hundred dollars which was blatantly refused, Scott was given no other choice then to get freedom from the courts which he had been taught to obey. In the june of 1847 Dred Scott went to court to get his freedom. His case failed because he couldn’t prove Mrs Emerson owned him. If Emerson’s Widow did not own him then now person owned Dred Scott. If no person owned Dred Scott the by definition Scott should have been declared a free man, The following year the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in to this situation. They decided it should be retried. The St Louis Circuit Court ruled that Scott and his family were free. After having freedom the Missouri Supreme Court reversed the decision of the previous court. Scot had too now take this to federal court to continue to fight for freedom which had been given then revoked. The North saw this as taking away a person's human rights. The south viewed this as a giant win for a twisted ideology. The circuit court upheld the Missouri supreme court's decision. Now the final frontier was
Emerson’s wife retained scott as her now property. Scott offered to buy his freedom from Mrs Emerson for three-hundred dollars which was blatantly refused, Scott was given no other choice then to get freedom from the courts which he had been taught to obey. In the june of 1847 Dred Scott went to court to get his freedom. His case failed because he couldn’t prove Mrs Emerson owned him. If Emerson’s Widow did not own him then now person owned Dred Scott. If no person owned Dred Scott the by definition Scott should have been declared a free man, The following year the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in to this situation. They decided it should be retried. The St Louis Circuit Court ruled that Scott and his family were free. After having freedom the Missouri Supreme Court reversed the decision of the previous court. Scot had too now take this to federal court to continue to fight for freedom which had been given then revoked. The North saw this as taking away a person's human rights. The south viewed this as a giant win for a twisted ideology. The circuit court upheld the Missouri supreme court's decision. Now the final frontier was