Preview

Sef Gonzales Report

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sef Gonzales Report
The law is both effective and ineffective throughout the entire criminal process in achieving justice in the murder case involving Sef Gonzales. The case “Regina vs Gonzales (2004) NSW SC 822” involved the triple murders of Gonzales’s mother, father and only sister The meaning of justice is that everyone is treated equally and fairly under the law. The law was effective in this case because justice was achieved, for the accused, for the victims and for society. Former Sydney student Sef Gonzales has been sentenced to life imprisonment for the triple murder of his parents, solicitor Ted Gonzales, Mary Loiva Gonzales and then 18-year old sister Clodine in their North Ryde home in Sydney’s north-west on July 10, 2001.Clodine Gonzales was the prisoner’s sister and his only sibling. She had had her eighteenth birthday on 9 July 2001, the day before the murders. Mary Loiva Josephine Gonzales was the prisoner’s mother and Teddy Gonzales was the prisoner’s father.
In order for a crime to occur, both elements of the crime, Actus Reus and mens rea must be present. Actus Reus and mens rea are legal terms used to define a crime. Both elements must be present for an accused to be found guilty of a crime (except for strict liability). Mens rea means that the person must have had a guilty mind at the time of committing the crime- that is they must have intended to commit the crime.
According to this case, both elements were present. Mens rea occurred when Gonzales had planned the killing for a long time and also had the intention to kill each of the victims and had actually administered poison to his mother Actus reus was the actions of the accused which occurred in this case when Gonzales did the physical act of murdering his mother, sister and father. He killed the victims by stabbing them with a knife or, in the case of Clodine, striking her with a bat and strangling her, as well as stabbing her with a knife. There was a high degree of violence in all of the murders. The law

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bert and Jack Scenario

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are three major elements that are required to be present in order for an attempt of a criminal act to take place. The first is the actual intent to commit the crime itself. The second element states that there must be an act or acts that take place towards committing the crime. Lastly, the attempt at the crime must have failed (Lippman, 2012, p.178). Along with the three elements, both mens rea and actus reus must be present. There are two determining factors when deciding if mens rea is present: the intent to commit the crime and intentionally performing acts that come close to completing the crime (Lippman, 2012, p.178). In addition there are three tests to determine if there is actus reus present. The first test is the physical proximity test. This…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mens rea: refers to the mental state of the accused; i.e. that the accused intended the actions.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (as shown in the book) Figure 2–1 illustrates the relationship between mens rea and actus reus. Criminality exists when the two concur and where no defense, as characterized in the figure, exists. Defenses in this figure refer to the zone of individual liberties over which governments have no authority to regulate and to those instances where other factual or legal defenses free an individual from criminal responsibility. Hence, as discussed in this chapter, the essence of criminal conduct consists of a concurrence of a criminal act with a culpable mental state.” In the case of the shooting of Mayor Crespo, wife Lyvette ‘actus reus’ or the criminal act is the shooting of her husband. ‘Mens rea’ is the wife’s culpable (or responsible) mental state during the incident. A concurrence of the two – actus reus and mens rea is clearly observed in the shooting, and this clearly constitutes as crime. Whatever outcome this may have in the coming days or weeks, I will be one of many spectators who wait for the full story and final decision. One thing is clear; a crime was obviously committed at the night of the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Narrowing the judges’ focus to only punishment and retribution would not serve the initial purpose of having a justice system at all. Certain members of the public may believe the opposite. These individuals believe that judges in our court system are too lenient on sentencing the accused. However, how knowledgeable are these individuals in the Australian justice system? In contrast to the expertise judges and Australian judicial workers have learnt through years of experience, must the public’s contradicting, non-expertise opinion determine the outcome of individuals accused of crime? Certainly, the law must take into account the values and expectations of the community. However, it is fundamental to our system of justice that there is the right of an offender to a fair trial must exist – this is protected in our current sentencing system. Under Section 5 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), a court should consider a number of objectives to determine the appropriate sentence; punishment, deterrence, denouncement, rehabilitation and protection. Sentencing legislation also specifies matters that courts must take into account when passing sentence, such as mitigating factors and the offender’s personal circumstances.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. True b. False 12. What is mens rea: guilty mind 13. What is Actus Rea: guilty act 14. What is concurrence: both guilty mind and act 15. In the Defense of Justification, one agrees they committed the act a. true b. False 16.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Actus Reus: A Latin term, which means the guilty act. Actus Reus means that there must be an action or physical movement.…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sef Gonzales

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sef Gonzales, aged 20, was convicted and sentenced in the Supreme Court of New South Wales to life imprisonment for the murder of his father Teddy Gonzales, 46, mother Mary Loiva Josephine, 43, and sister Clodine, 18. On July 10th 2001, at about 4.30pm Gonzales entered his sister Clodine’s bedroom, where she was studying. He was armed with a baseball bat and two large knives he had retrieved from the kitchen. It was found that he compressed Clodine’s neck trying to strangle her, struck her at least six separate blows to the head with the bat and stabbed her many times, inflicting five major stab wounds to her neck and two major stab wounds to her abdomen.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Elements of Crime

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many different crimes that people can commit in today’s society. For each crime there is an actus reus, mens rea, and it is classified as either crime against property, crime against person, or crime against public order. Listed below are kidnapping, robbery, and disorderly conduct.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For the charge of homicide, all of the required elements are present in the facts of the case. The journal entries discussing the purchase of rope, rags, and a sharp hunting knife "to fulfill [his] destiny" prove mens rea. Actus reus is proven in the evidence that the victim was found with cloth stuffed in her mouth, arms and legs tied with rope restraints, and…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The actus reus of this offence is any act which causes the victim (v) to apprehend an immediate infliction of unlawful violence (iiuv). No force need actually be applied, creating a fear is sufficient, as was illustrated by Logdon and Lamb. The v must fear that violence threatened is immediate, in Smith this was held to mean as part of the current activity, when the v was separated from the defendant (d) by a glass window.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Reform Essay Year 11

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages

    New concepts of justice are one of the settings that give rise to law reform. Society evolves over time and its views on justice alter for a variety of reasons. In the past, capital punishment for particular murder offences was seen as the most effective way of dealing with the most monstrous crimes. It was a case of society delivering pure retribution for a crime: ‘a life for a life’. As a result, social attitudes with respect to capital punishment shifted and no Australian jurisdiction now permits it. Capital punishment no longer served community’s purposes. This is conveyed in the Bilal Skaf law. In his case two people from the jury investigated the crime scene, this is strictly against the law, which led the case to start all over again. However a new law was introduced and electronic transcript that was used for their previous case was allowed to be used. Thus, the effectiveness of law reform in attaining impartial outcomes with regard to current law reform cases has been confirmed in this case.…

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is the actual act that the person is accused of to be convicted the evidence must support the accusation that the person committed the crime…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Reform

    • 3787 Words
    • 16 Pages

    New concepts of justice: As the social values change, so does our views of the concept of justice. Sentencing laws are continually subject to law reform scrutiny. Areas where sentences are currently underview in NSW relate to corporate offences and Indigenous offenders. At the Federal level the use of periodic detention as a form of punishment has been questioned because of the difficulties in administering it.…

    • 3787 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays