Preview

Sex Differences In Ultrasonic Vocalization in Rat Pups

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sex Differences In Ultrasonic Vocalization in Rat Pups
3276 • The Journal of Neuroscience, February 20, 2013 • 33(8):3276 –3283

Behavioral/Cognitive

Foxp2 Mediates Sex Differences in Ultrasonic Vocalization by Rat Pups and Directs Order of Maternal Retrieval
J. Michael Bowers,1 Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen,4,5 N. Shalon Edwards,3 and Margaret M. McCarthy1,2,3
Departments of 1Physiology and 2Psychiatry, and 3Department of Pharmacology and Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine,
Baltimore, Maryland 21201, and 4Centro de Investigaciones Cerebrales and 5Doctorado en Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, 91000 Xalapa, Me´xico

The FOXP2 gene is central to acquisition of speech and language in humans and vocal production in birds and mammals. Rodents communicate via ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) and newborn pups emit distress USVs when separated from their dam, thereby facilitating their retrieval. We observed that isolated male rat pups emitted substantially more USV calls and these were characterized by a significantly lower frequency and amplitude compared with female rat pups. Moreover, the dam was more likely to first retrieve male pups back to the nest, then females. The amount of Foxp2 protein was significantly higher in multiple regions of the developing male brain compared with females and a reduction of brain Foxp2 by siRNA eliminated the sex differences in USVs and altered the order of pup retrieval. Our results implicate Foxp2 as a component of the neurobiological basis of sex differences in vocal communication in mammals.
We extended these observations to humans, a species reported to have gender differences in language acquisition, and found the amount of FOXP2 protein in the left hemisphere cortex of 4-year-old boys was significantly lower than in age-matched girls.

Introduction
Effective communication between conspecifics is essential to fitness at both the individual and species level. Bird song has proven particularly valuable because of the profound sex differences exhibited



References: Amateau SK, McCarthy MM (2002) A novel mechanism of dendritic spine plasticity involving estradiol induction of prostaglandin-E2 22:8586 – 8596. Medline Bates E (1976) Language and context Bates E, Benigni L, Bretherton I, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1979) The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic. Bell SM, Ainsworth MD (1972) Infant crying and maternal responsiveness. (2008) The Danish Communicative Developmental Inventories: validity and main developmental trends Medline Brunelli SA (2005) Selective breeding for an infant phenotype: rat pup ultrasonic vocalization (USV) Burgdorf J, Panksepp J, Brudzynski SM, Beinfeld MC, Cromwell HC, Kroes RA, Moskal JR (2009) The effects of selective breeding for differential Dev Psychobiol 51:34 – 46. CrossRef Medline Butterworth G, Morissette P (1996) Onset of pointing and the acquisition of Ehret G (2005) Infant rodent ultrasounds—a gate to the understanding of sound communication Enard W, Przeworski M, Fisher SE, Lai CS, Wiebe V, Kitano T, Monaco AP, Pa¨a¨bo S (2002) Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418:869 – 872. CrossRef Medline Fisher SE, Scharff C (2009) FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends Genet 25:166 –177. CrossRef Medline Haesler S, Rochefort C, Georgi B, Licznerski P, Osten P, Scharff C (2007) Medline Hamson DK, Csupity AS, Gaspar JM, Watson NV (2009) Analysis of Foxp2 expression in the cerebellum reveals a possible sex difference. Neuroreport 20:611– 616. CrossRef Medline Hofer MA, Shair H (1978) Ultrasonic vocalization during social interaction Wohlleber E, Illig T, Bezzina CR, Franke A, Spranger S, VillavicencioLorini P, Seifert W, Rosenfeld J, et al. (2010) Identification of FOXP1 deletions in three unrelated patients with mental retardation and significant speech and language deficits Medline Huttenlocher J Haight W, Bryk A, Seltzer M, Lyons T (1991) Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender 248. CrossRef Kelley DB, Bass AH (2010) Neurobiology of vocal communication: mechanisms for sensorimotor integration and vocal patterning Konopka G, Bomar JM, Winden K, Coppola G, Jonsson ZO, Gao F, Peng S, Preuss TM, Wohlschlegel JA, Geschwind DH (2009) Human-specific Krause J, Lalueza-Fox C, Orlando L, Enard W, Green RE, Burbano HA, Hublin JJ, Ha¨nni C, Fortea J, de la Rasilla M, Bertranpetit J, Rosas A, Pa¨a¨bo S (2007) The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neanderthals. Curr Biol 17:1908 –1912. CrossRef Medline Lai CS, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F, Monaco AP (2001) A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 413:519 –523. CrossRef Medline Li S, Weidenfeld J, Morrisey EE (2004) Transcriptional and DNA binding activity of the Foxp1/2/4 family is modulated by heterotypic and homotypic protein interactions. Mol Cell Biol 24:809 – 822. CrossRef Medline Maccoby E (1966) The development of sex differences MacDermot KD, Bonora E, Sykes N, Coupe AM, Lai CS, Vernes SC, VarghaKhadem F, McKenzie F, Smith RL, Monaco AP, Fisher SE (2005) Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits McCarthy MM, Arnold AP (2011) Reframing sexual differentiation of the brain J. Neurosci., February 20, 2013 • 33(8):3276 –3283 • 3283 Meyer A, Zardoya R (2003) Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny P, Geschwind DH (2011) Regulation of MET by FOXP2, genes implicated in higher cognitive dysfunction and autism risk. J Neurosci 31: 11437–11442 Newbury DF, Monaco AP (2010) Genetic advances in the study of speech and language disorders Nottebohm F, Arnold AP (1976) Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain Fisher SE, Shendure J, Eichler EE (2011) Exome sequencing in sporadic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations 43:585–589. CrossRef Medline Ozc¸alis¸kan S, Goldin-Meadow S (2010) Sex differences in language first appear in gesture Pinker S (1994) The language instinct: how the mind creates language. New York: Harper Perennial. Ptak SE, Enard W, Wiebe V, Hellmann I, Krause J, Lachmann M, Pa¨a¨bo S (2009) Linkage disequilibrium extends across putative selected sites in FOXP2. Mol Biol Evol 26:2181–2184. CrossRef Medline Ramer A (1976) Syntactic styles in emerging language Schulz SB, Haesler S, Scharff C, Rochefort C (2010) Knockdown of FoxP2 alters spine density in Area X of the zebra finch 740. CrossRef Medline Simpson AP (2009) Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Lang Linguist Compass 3:621– 640. CrossRef Teramitsu I, Kudo LC, London SE, Geschwind DH, White SA (2004) Parallel FoxP1 and FoxP2 expression in songbird and human brain predicts functional interaction. J Neurosci 24:3152–3163. CrossRef Medline Teramitsu I, Poopatanapong A, Torrisi S, White SA (2010) Striatal FoxP2 is Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comm 307 Study Guide

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    EX: Is there a significant difference between the amount of words (talkatively) females and males?…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This tree shows the similarities found between all of the species that were listed on the ortholog search. This helps in narrowing down what the exact function of the gene is. It was determined that the species, Danio rerio, Xenopus tropicalis, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Homo sapiens all shared similar functions for this gene. Thus the assumption was made that L. cuprina had to have a similar if not exactly the same as the closest species to it. Reading the tree, that species would have to be Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Homo sapiens.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To explore cognitive development in terms of the specialisation of function in specific cortical structures, one must outline association between structural differentiation and functional specialisation. The typically developed adult brain shows predictable associations between specific cortical areas with particular cognitive functions. Prior to maturation, the developing brain demonstrates increasing differentiation in both structure and function of cells, with structural changes directly affecting functional capacity. The structural differentiation[1] of neural pathways through the processes of dendritic growth, myelination and encapsulation result in cortical areas highly efficient in supporting particular types of information, or specialised functions. The underlying reasons for the organisation…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies revealed that, in regards to the specific attachment approach, female animals have upregulated OT receptors in the uterus and brain that are important in coordinating maternal behavior. This type of behavior includes licking the pups, providing a nest for the pups, retrieving the pups to the nest, giving access to the nipples and providing body heat. OT has been implicated in the onset of maternal behavior and not specifically the maintenance. The article also demonstrated maternal aggression and how it is directed towards the pups but also how it enhances attacks on predators or intruders. This aggression is associated with lower levels of fear. In both rodents and humans, administering OT results in lower levels of fearful behavior. Researchers suggest that, unlike in female rodents, OT does not contribute to human maternal behaviors. However, OT is increased in the cerebrospinal fluid during childbirth in humans and postpartum plasma levels are related with positive feelings and decreased anxiety levels. Mixed results have been drawn about maternal aggression in human and other species but as to whether or not these behaviors are associated with OT are not clear. In the article, how the presence of OT affects mating and partner preferences. In animals, specifically the prairie vole and the montane vole, the OT recptors are found in…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multi-Regionalists tend to argue in favor of the Neanderthal’s capability to use language. A major genetic piece of evidence that they call upon to support their assertion is the existence of the FoxP2, “language”, gene which is prevalent in Neanderthals. Although this gene does contribute greatly to the human comprehension of language it is not significant enough to hold up speech capabilities on its own. “...FoxP2 is not unique to humans. Quite the opposite, versions of this gene are found in remarkably similar forms in a great many vertebrate species (including primates, rodents, birds, reptiles, and…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the center of the brain is the hypothalamus, or the “breeding center,” which releases neurons that in turn release hormones are unique to either sex. Puberty, directly affected by hormones, occurs in different rates in males and females as well, as females begin the process approximately two years earlier than males. These hormones also cause differences in outward male and female appearances, in addition to the theory of sexual selection over time (which suggests that certain characteristics are retained due to widespread…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William O Barr Atkins

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Concluded that speech patterns were “neither characteristic of all women, nor limited to only women”…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The development of language isn’t due solely to a larger brain, but also to genes and the physiological anatomy of humans.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Developmental apraxia is believed by many researchers to be a neurologically based speech-motor disorder, but exact causes have not been isolated (Causes of Apraxia, 2010). Researcher’s studies have not shown a difference or abnormalities in the brains of…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kappel, S., Harford, M., Burns, V., & Anderson, N. (1973). Effects of Vocalization on Short-…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kathy Hirch-Pasek has She has received her bachelor’s degree from University of Pittsburgh and her PhD from the University of Pennsylvania (Hirsh-Pasek, Golinkoff, & Eyer, 2003). Now she is a professor at Temple University where she has conducted an experiment called “Infant Language.” The “Infant Language” experiment she conducted studied the development of children from two months to ten years old (Hirsh-Pasek, Golinkoff, & Eyer, 2003). She has received the “American Psychological Association’s Brofenbrenner Award for Lifetime Contribution of Developmental Psychology in the Service of Science and Society” ,“The American Psychogical Association’s Award for Distinguished Service to Psychological Science” , “Temple’s University Great Teacher Award” and the “University Eberman Research Award.” From that experience she has found and witnessed the development of children…

    • 1714 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The FMR1 gene is located on the X chromosome; we all have 46 chromosomes in all of our cells. Out of 46 chromosomes, 44 chromosomes are numbered 1-22 in pairs. Females have two X chromosomes and males have one X and one Y chromosome. Each chromosome has two arms, one called the “P” arm (the short arm) and one called the “Q” arm (the long arm). There are many genes on each chromosome and each gene is given an address, the address of the FMR1 gene is Xq27.3. The physical characteristic of the FXS chromosome looks like the end part of the…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lecturing and Listening

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Have you ever noticed the way men and women converse with each other? Is there a difference with how they communicate verbally and non-verbally? Studies and experiments by linguist have30 shown that differences in speech and body language are apparent between the male and female gender. First, men impose and lecture their side of the story when conversating while women on the other hand have a more open exchange of ideas. Second, men do not show any body signals indicating that they are listening but women on the other hand give signs that show their affirmation or opposal. Third, men generally dominate the conversation most of the time while women just listen passively.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Gender similarities one part of the hypothalamus responsible for sexual behaviors is larger in men than women”. (Santrock, 2010, p.436).…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ivry, R. B., & Justus, T. C. (2001). A neural instantiation of the motor theory of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences , 24 (9), 513-515.…

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics