Preview

Shaw and Barry

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shaw and Barry
Module 2 – Written Assignment
1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples.
Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60).
The second form of utilitarianism is called rule utilitarianism. According to our text, this form of utilitarianism maintains that the utilitarian standard should be applied, not to individual actions, but to moral codes as a whole (Shaw & Barry, p.76).
Rule Utilitarianism is based only on one single rule, which is utility. According to this theory, it is immaterial whether the utility provides any happiness or not. According to this theory, it is the value of the consequences of a particular act that counts while determining whether an act is morally correct or not. The value of consequences of an act is determined by the number of positive outcomes that can result for the greatest number of people.
2. What do economists mean by the "declining marginal utility of money"?
According to the text, declining marginal utility of money, is the phrase that means that successive increases to one’s income produce, on average, less welfare or happiness, than did earlier additions (Shaw & Barry, p.112). Simply put, the more money you make, it takes bigger increases to make you happy.
3. Robert Nozick presents his entitlement theory as a function of three basic principles. What are these three basic principles?
According to our text there are three basic principles that are the basis for Nozicks entitlement theory. The first of these states that a person who acquires a holding, in according with the principle of justice, in acquisition is entitled to that holding (Shaw & Barry, p.114).
The second

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says an action is right insofar as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that "the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism Act means to do the right action that will benefit a good amount of people over any other option. In the two examples I read from Bernard Williams “A Critique of Utilitarianism” I realized those were two difficult choices these two men had to make. However, if we follow the Utilitarianism Act, George would of taken the job offer and Jim would unfortunately sacrifice one of the protestors to save the rest. By George taking the job offer, it would benefit his family financially and also help his family’s emotional battle. Also, George opposing chemical and biological warfare would mean he wont have much interest compared to the other gentlemen that had much more interest on the subject. This will benefit a large amount of people…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week 1

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism usually relies on predicting the consequences of an action. Utilitarianism sets that an action is morally right when the action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative (Boylan, Chapter 12, 2009). In this ethical theory, the consequences should fully be considered, as it will affect the most people.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism the theory that the right moral act is the one that produces the greatest good for society, emphasizes NOT RULES BUT RESULTS.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opposing John Rawls’ difference principle is Robert Nozick, who questions the government’s responsibility to exercise the difference principle. Nozick’s believe is that the difference principle is unjust and commences his argument of a just society, through his entitlement theory, by contemplating the process of property ownership. In doing so, Nozick embraces John Locke’s position through the “Just Original Acquisition” principle. According to Locke, the “Just Original Acquisition” bases the ownership of property on two requisites in order to properly claim ownership of property. The first requisite is that the particular piece of interest must be previously unclaimed or unowned and the second requisite is that some sort of labor must be accomplished in order to properly take claim ownership of property. Upon meeting the previously mentioned requisites and respecting the Lockean proviso (leave as good as and enough for others), the ownership claim for property is considered just.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    act and rule

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will be comparing the Act and Rule variations of Utilitarianism to uncover the difference between the two. Utilitarianism is teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which argues that something is good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of the people. Jeremy Bentham formalized this theory through his principle of Utility, “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Act Utilitarianism is often linked to Jeremy Bentham’s principle of Utility as it follows the one rule – “the greatest good for the greatest number”. So an individual action is only right if it promotes happiness. Rule utilitarianism argues that moral rules, also based on the principle of Utility, should be kept by everyone in similar circumstances.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I strongly reason that Utilitarianism is a good theory to implement in the 21st century and is an important approach to ethical decision-making. There are different types of utilitarianism. However, rule utilitarianism will be used to explain my reasoning. This theory states that the right action is which follows with the set of rules, if generally or universally accepted, would maximize utility (Crisp et al. 2011). This type focuses on achieving ultimate maximization of…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Define what act utilitarianism is (your definition should also include a brief description of what utility means vs. disutility).…

    • 1277 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Past paper

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Examining Body for this A…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism allows for the guidelines to change with time, this is a strength because people are in a constant flux, as society develops people’s morals are changing, an act which may have been considered out of bounds before, is acceptable now. Act utilitarianism allows for different cultures and backgrounds to be considered when making the decision, which is a strength because everybody’s personal beliefs of right and wrong are different. A weakness of classical utilitarianism is that it can be difficult to come to a decision based on all the different aspects of the situation. As there are no set laws, any act is…

    • 380 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sex/Gender Selection

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rule-utilitarian examines two claims that have been advanced in the name of human reason. First, we should look at the moral principal that we should do what is required by moral rules. Rule-utilitarian is based on the concept of…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism states that everyone should always follow the rule that will bring about the greatest good for all concerned. Act Utilitarianism states that everyone should perform the act that will bring the greatest good for everyone affected by the act. Ross’s Prima Facie Duties maintained that all human beings must obey these duties (fidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, and nonmaleficence) before other considerations enter the picture unless serious circumstances tell us to do…

    • 3101 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays