Preview

Philosophical Ethics Study Guide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophical Ethics Study Guide
Philosophical Ethics: Part A

1. Name and briefly describe the four main aspects of the AU decision-making process.

i. Scope → Includes all those affected by the act, either directly or indirectly ii. Duration → Considers the length of time of each effect iii. Intensity → Considers the force or strength of each resulting experience iv. Probability → Considers how likely each effect might be, given that we don’t know ahead of time which of the many possible effects will actually occur.

2. Define what act utilitarianism is (your definition should also include a brief description of what utility means vs. disutility).

i. Act Unitarianism → States that the morally right act in any given situation is the act that would produce the greatest overall utility in its consequences to that person. ii. Utility → Desirable consequences which are said to have positive utility iii. Disutility → Undesirable consequences, often associated with pain and suffering, are said to have negative utility

3. What is the moral saints problem? Which moral theory does it object to?

i. Moral Saints Problem → Since utilitarianism requires us to do whatever produces the greatest overall utility, we can never settle for anything less than that. ii. Moral Confirmation → The Moral Saints Problem objects moral confirmation by placing demands upon us that extend beyond what even the best of us normally take to be our moral duty.

4. Consider person A, who acts to help person B, who is in need. Would Kant say that A’s helping B is wrong because A gets good feelings from helping B? Briefly explain your reply.

i. Kant believed that if any action is not done with the motive of duty, then it is without moral value. Kant believed that every action should have pure intention behind it or else it was meaningless. Kant did not think that the final result was the most important aspect of an action, but how the person felt while carrying out the action was the time at which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    First of all, an act (extreme) utilitarian concentrates on the effects of individual actions; therefore, act utilitarian believes that actions should result in the best overall result possible and produce the most usefulness. Usefulness is defined by…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act utilitarianism (AU) is a fairly straightforward theory with an obligation to equality and impartiality. It comprises of mainly utility and disutility, or in simple terms utility equates to happiness or something worth pursuing and disutility equates to unhappiness or…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When looking to Kant’s ethics, we can see two main strands derive from his studies, nameably the Categorical Imperative and the Hypothetical imperative. With regards the Hypothetical Imperative, this can be laid out as ‘doing A to get B’, and so is performing an action in order to gain something else as an end. This contrasts what Kant believes to be moral, the Categorical imperative, set out as ‘do A’, and therefore in principle would suggest that you should not seek reward from our actions but rather treat people as ends in themselves, as a pose to using them as means to an end. This is what Kant refers to as summun bonum, otherwise referred to as ‘goodwill’. According to him, someone of goodwill is not good because of what they achieve or accomplish, but rather because they act out of duty. This is outlined in Kant’s…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism the theory that the right moral act is the one that produces the greatest good for society, emphasizes NOT RULES BUT RESULTS.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism = an ethical philosophy that says the most ethical decision or course of action is the one that maximize utility.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Right

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Act - determines the goodness of a particular act by measuring the utility (good) for all, but only for that specific act and without regard for future actions.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of utilitarianism, actions are evaluated by the outcome. What we should do is to maximize the good outcomes and minimize the bad outcomes. The most promising way of reaching the final decision is to choose the one that would bring about the greatest net benefits to everyone affected by the action once the harms had been taken into account.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion Test Reviews

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism – method of justifying acts “utilitarianism”. utilirianism is really a moral principle that holds that the morally right course of action in any situation is the one that produces the greatest balance of benefits, and pleasure in order to avoid pain for everyone affected.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ™With reference to one or more examples from applied ethics, evaluate the claim that a moral action is one that maximizes utility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Ethicals

    • 4224 Words
    • 17 Pages

    1. There may be biological differences between blacks and whites which would affect the applicability of the findings…

    • 4224 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Occupy Wall Street

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarian is the moral doctrine that we should always act to produce the greatest possible balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. The greatest happiness of all constitutes the standard that determines whether an action is right or wrong. Our belief that we are individuals and society is the net result of our choices. For example, the practice of blowing up rocks to release underground natural gas would not be permitted near residential areas if energy complaints…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant believed that goodwill must been done because it is your duty. We all know we are not performing goodwill when we are doing something bad, but according to Kant sometimes even when we are doing something we think is good, it's still not goodwill because we expect a certain outcome. For example, if I were to donate money to charity knowing that I would get a feeling of happiness from the act, it was not actually ethically good. I had an intent and expectation about the outcome, which negated the goodwill of the act. Duty is about doing the right thing when you do not want…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Principle of Double Effect

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When there is a clash between the two universal norms of "do good" and "avoid evil," the question arises as to whether the obligation to avoid evil requires one to abstain from a good action in order to prevent a foreseen but merely permitted concomitant evil effect. The answer is that one need not always abstain from a good action that has foreseen bad effects, depending on certain moral criteria identified in the principle of double effect. Though five are listed here, some authors emphasize only four basic moral criteria (the fifth listed here further specifies the third criterion):…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays