In his consumer guide for The Village Voice, critic Robert Christgau gave it an A rating,[3] indicating "a record that rarely flags for more than two or three tracks".[16] Christgau stated, "he goes for a rugged, expansive vigor, nailing both come-fly-with-me cosmopolitanism and the hunger for excitement that's turned gangster hangouts into musical hotbeds from Buenos Aires to Kansas City".[3] Rolling Stone writer Kris Ex found that Jay-Z "has become a better architect of songs" and dubbed Vol. 3... "his strongest album to date, with music that's filled with catchy hooks, rump-shaking beats and lyrics fueled by Jay's hustler's vigilance".[7] In a mixed review, Los Angeles Times writer Soren Baker gave it two-and-a-half out of four stars and viewed that it lacks the "biting humor and spectacular wordplay" of his previous albums.[5] Dele Fadele of NME found it less reflective than his previous work, but commended Jay-Z as "an
In his consumer guide for The Village Voice, critic Robert Christgau gave it an A rating,[3] indicating "a record that rarely flags for more than two or three tracks".[16] Christgau stated, "he goes for a rugged, expansive vigor, nailing both come-fly-with-me cosmopolitanism and the hunger for excitement that's turned gangster hangouts into musical hotbeds from Buenos Aires to Kansas City".[3] Rolling Stone writer Kris Ex found that Jay-Z "has become a better architect of songs" and dubbed Vol. 3... "his strongest album to date, with music that's filled with catchy hooks, rump-shaking beats and lyrics fueled by Jay's hustler's vigilance".[7] In a mixed review, Los Angeles Times writer Soren Baker gave it two-and-a-half out of four stars and viewed that it lacks the "biting humor and spectacular wordplay" of his previous albums.[5] Dele Fadele of NME found it less reflective than his previous work, but commended Jay-Z as "an