Tone : One of the tones that are used in the narrative is Resentment . there is resentment towards the Burman people for making fun of him. “As a police officer I was obvious targeted, the insults hooted after me … got badly on my nerves .” Orwell states the disapproval of the Burman’s mocking showed he was irritated and resented . The other tone is pressure. Orwell was pressured into shooting the elephant.…
On the other hand, the story "Shooting an Elephant” was wrote by George Orwell base on his personal experience in Moulmein, in Lower Burma .He served his country, "British Empire as a colonial administrator. The author described the effects on the oppressed Burmese Indians and theirs oppressor British Empire. The internal conflict of British men, his feelings and convictions linked to his pride from of the angry crowd. Shooting an Elephant is more than a personal experience story, is a reflection of the dilemmas of morals standards in real life and the costs that it represent as a human been and his nature as well .…
George Orwell is well known, even though he died in 1950. He was British and an ex-cop. George Orwell is a very prominent author. He is known for a few of his books, written for a variety of purposes. However, this specific essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, is written to inform of us. He phrases this essay more as a narrative, which makes it not rhetorically effective. George Orwell uses great imagery and his syntax makes it simple for even high schoolers to read through his works.…
Finally, to save the honor of him and that of other Europeans, Orwell decided to shoot the elephant. Though he had had no previous experience of shooting an elephant, he was more concerned of the prestige than his own safety. At last, discarding all fear, he pulled the trigger and shot bullet after bullet to confirm the killing.…
George Orwell describes to us in “Shooting an elephant” the struggle that his character faces when to win the mobs approval and respect when he shoots down an innocent animal and sacrifices what he believes to be right. Orwell is a police officer in Moulmein, during the period of the British occupation of Burma. An escaped elephant gives him the opportunity to prove himself in front of his people and to be able to become a “somebody” on the social scene.…
The thesis of George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is, “When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys.” This sentence is found in paragraph 7, line 14. This is the thesis of the essay because it reflects on the fact that Orwell feels reluctant at first to shoot the elephant, because he sees how peaceful and harmless it is. But as the crowd behind him pressures him with their laughter and screams, he finally pulls the trigger, with out actually thinking, and he repeatedly shoots the elephant trying to kill it, in mad rampage. This scene reflects back to the part of the thesis, “it is his own freedom he destroys” because Orwell demonstrates losing his freedom to behave intelligently and morally. He doesn’t want to kill…
“Shooting an Elephant” is an essay written by George Orwell and published in 1936 (Orwell 66). Orwell was born June 25, 1903, as Eric Arthur Blair and passed away January 21, 1950, in India (“George Orwell Biography”). Orwell was known for his journals, novels, and essays published about his own political views (“George Orwell Biography”). Orwell traveled to Burma after not doing good enough in school to earn a scholarship and decided to join the imperial police (Orwell 66). While on duty one day, Orwell received a call that a rampaging elephant was on the loose that had killed a man and destroyed a hut (Orwell 67). Once Orwell found the elephant calm in a field he was faced with a decision of whether to kill the elephant or let it be (Orwell 69). Orwell killed the elephant for the safety of himself and out of pressure from the Burmese standing behind him (Orwell 70). While Orwell contemplated shooting the elephant he knew out of the town he was the only one able to have a weapon to kill the elephant (Orwell 67). The Burmese weren’t allowed to have weapons because the British Empire outlawed them to prevent the Burmese from revolting. The British Empire didn’t want the Burmese to over power them and revolt because they wanted to maintain power imperialism. The British Empire needed to keep the Burmese under their control because they needed the resources from the land. The Burmese were helpless against the rampaging elephant because the British Empire needed to maintain dominance over the Burmese.…
Orwell hated the British Empire but sympathized with the Burmans because of how they are being treated by them. After killing the elephant Orwell’s thoughts seemed to be like that of the British. He was selfish in decision to kill the elephant. Orwell did not want to kill the elephant at first but there were many opposing forces that made him do it. He was faced with obligation.…
He felt comfort in knowing that because a man had died due to the elephant's rage, that he was legally in the right. However, he stated did not stand for imperialism, and that it was “evil”, yet he displayed the very thing he despised. The Burmese people were treated terribly by the Empire. Orwell even says, “The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos—all these oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt.” By that, it reflects exactly what the elephants living conditions were. And with all of the rage pent up from being confined and living in deplorable conditions, once the elephant was freed, it had every reason to go rogue. Just like the elephant, the people of Lower Burman had a reason to be rebellious and filled with hate. Orwell was in a position to simply wait for the elephant's to mahout come back, as it harmlessly fed itself in the distance. Instead, he gave in to the pressure, let his ego take over, and took the life of an…
Nevertheless, Orwell was deeply disturbed, as he was in a postion he did not like, and was caught in the middle where he ought to make the decision of killing the mad elephant. He was indirectly force to do this in front thousands who hated him not knowing or care that he did not want to kill the elphant but the imperialism was evil. He seem to have become a hypocrite to himself, not liking treatment of his prisoners or the smelly cages, he was uneducated felt he could do nothing even in the position he held.…
Orwell responds to the call, taking his rifle, “an old 44 Winchester and much too small to kill an elephant” (2845 Orwell) in hopes of frightening it with the noise. This elephant was not wild, but normally tame and broke loose due to sexual desire. This first action is just an exercise of authority in maintaining order; however, in seeing a dead native victim he requests an elephant rifle and five cartridges. This is when the Burmese become quite excited and an “immense crowd of two thousand” (2846 Orwell) follow him. They believe that the imperial police officer is going to shoot the elephant when, in actuality, he just wanted to defend himself from becoming another devilish corpse.…
4) The European people were divided in the Orwell's decision to shot the elephant. The older Europeans supported Orwell's decision in shooting the elephant, because the elephant had gone mad and attacked. Younger Europeans disagreed with his decision in belief that the elephants life was more vaulible than a Coringhee coolie. “...because an elephant was worth more than any damn Coringhee coolie.” (984). I for one support Orwell's decision to shot the elephant. He made the right decision due to the fact that the elephant had gone off and killed another animal. If he had not shot the elephant their was a chance that the elephant could have killed other animals or even a…
This is almost a microscopic parallel to how when first Britain came to Burma and established its power through oppression and violence. The author also describes the elephant as a “powerful machinery” (950) which represents the economic foundation of the working Burmese and should not be destroyed. However, the elephant is hated by its people, and is demanded to be killed. During the critical moment during which it falls, the author uses the phrase “powerless to move, yet powerless to die” (951) and words such as “senile” to imply a true feeble state of Imperialism. The author lastly reveals the evil nature of Imperialism through the inner conflict of young Orwell as he faces the moral dilemma of whether or not he should kill the elephant. How young Orwell comes to form his decision is very paradoxical. This is because the officer himself does not want to kill the seemingly innocent elephant when he finds it eating in the field. Also on top of that, Orwell hates the imperialistic power as shown in quote “For at that time I had already made up my mind that Imperialism was an evil thing…and I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British”…
In the story “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, the main character had gone threw a big change throughout the story. The changes that he had encountered may have not been intentional, but peer pressure has its way of influencing people to do things they don’t want to do. In this story a tamed elephant turns for the worse and the main character is called into take care of the problem.…
Orwells final act of killing the elephant to please a crowd and look like a powerful sahib, in my opinion, was unjustified. I think Orwell dismissed valid reasons in his desperate attempt to save his pride. He expressed several times that he knew with perfect certainty that he ought not to shoot him, although the elephant had killed a coolie, it was not longer a risk to the natives. In addition, he watched the elephant eating grass with grandmotherly air acknowledging that to shoot him would be a murder because the animal looked no more dangerous than a cow, however, his concern of being laughed at and humiliated clouded his judgment therefore deciding to shoot the elephant. Orwells tried to justify his decision by using rhetorical appeals arguing that legally he had done the right thing claiming that a mad elephant has to be killed, like a mad dog , if its owner fails to control it. Regardless of the legality of his actions, in my opinion, it was the wrong choice and the death of the animal could have been avoided if Orwells ego would not had been the main focus of the outcome. In the end, Orwell did not shoot the elephant in self defense nor to save the natives lives and their properties, but to save face and fulfill the expectations of the two thousand happy faces that although did not like him, with a magical rifle in his hands, he was suddenly worth watching. Meanwhile, Orwell was left with the troubles of his actions and wondering whether any of the others grasps that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool. PAGE SAVING FACE…