Preview

short term financial management

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
17867 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
short term financial management
CHAPTER

2
Analysis of the
Working Capital Cycle

Order placed Inventory received Payment sent Sale
Inventory

Accounts receivable

Cash received Collection float

Time
Accounts payable

Disbursement float
Payment
sent

Cash disbursed OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
• distinguish between solvency and liquidity.
• differentiate between solvency ratios and the cash conversion period.
• calculate and interpret the cash conversion period.
• determine the change in shareholder wealth attributable to changes in the cash conversion period.

F

unds invested in working capital constantly shift among the various balance sheet accounts. To illustrate, a credit sale results in an accounts receivable.
The eventual collection of the receivable yields increased cash and a reduced receivable balance. During the operating cycle payments are made to various parties, as reflected in accounts payable and accruals. The continuous ebb and flow of cash inflows and outflows from production and revenue generation is referred to as the cash cycle. The length of this cycle directly influences firm liquidity; hence, it is important to monitor working capital behavior via the cash cycle.
This chapter discusses techniques used to quantify working capital management. The analysis begins with a review and critique of traditional measures used to assess working capital practices. A major focus of the chapter is to distinguish solvency from liquidity. The former concerns whether assets exceed liabilities, whereas liquidity refers to the firm’s ability to meet short-term obligations with cash while remaining a going-concern.1 The major empha1 The going-concern principle involves the firm’s ability to remain as a viable business. Hence, solvency violates the going-concern principle as selling off assets to repay

sis of the chapter centers on the cash conversion period, which is the length of



References: Heitor Almeida, Murillo Campello, and Dirk Hackbarth. 2011. Liquidity Mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 102 James S. Ang. 1991. The corporate-slack controversy. In Yong Kim and Venkat Srinivasan, V., (eds): Advances in Working Capital Management, vol Thomas W. Bates, Kathleen M. Kahle, and Rene M. Stulz. 2009. Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash than They Used To? William J. Baumol. 1952. The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 66:4, 1952, 545–556. Bruce D. Bagamery. 1987. On the correspondence between the Baumol-Tobin and Miller-Orr optimal cash balance models Hans G. Daellenbach. 1974. Are cash management optimization models worthwhile? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis September:607–626. Amy Dittmar and Jan Mahrt-Smith. 2007. Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings, Journal of Financial Economics 83, 599–634. Gary W. Emery. 1984. Measuring Short-Term Liquidity. Journal of Cash Management, July-August: 25–32. Gary W. Emery and Kenneth O. Cogger. 1982. The Measurement of Liquidity. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn: 290–303. Michael Faulkender and Rong Wang. 2006. Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash, Journal of Finance 61, 1957–1990. Laurent Fresard. 2010. Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings Fritz C. Foley, Jay Hartzell, Sheridan Titman, and Garry J. Twite. 2007. Why Do Firms Hold So Much Cash? A Tax-Based Explanation, Journal of Finance 86, 579–607. Jarrad Harford, Sattar Masni, and William Maxwell. 2008. Corporate Governance and a Firm’s Cash Holdings, Journal of Financial Economics 87, 535–555. Michael Jensen. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76, 323–329. John Maynard Keynes, 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan. Chang-Soo Kim, David C. Mauer, and Ann E. Sherman. 1998. The determinants of corporate liquidity: Theory and evidence Sandy Klasa, William F. Maxwell, and Hernan Ortiz-Molina, 2009. The Strategic Use of Corporate Cash Holdings in Collective Bargaining with Labor Unions Karl Lins, Henri Servaes, and Peter Tufano, “What Drives Corporate Liquidity? An International Survey of Cash Holdings and Lines of Credit,” Journal of Financial Economics 98, 160–176, 2010. Wayne Mikkelson and Megan Partch. 2003. Do Persistent Large Cash Reserves Hinder Performance? Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis 38, 275–294.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Why would a corporation have excess cash that it does not need for operations?…

    • 729 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUSN 5200 W4 Homework

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comments on liquidity: Cannot tell if these ratios are good or bad without more information on the company’s situation or past years.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fin 341

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liquidity ratios show the relationship between the current assets and current liabilities. These ratios provide us with a view of the company’s ability to pay its current liabilities. KR has a current ratio of 0.72 and a quick ratio of 0.25. WFM has a current ratio of 2.15 and a quick ratio of 1.77. Both companies’ consists largely of inventory. If both KR and WFM sold their entire inventory, they would be in the same comparable position. These ratios show that WFM is more liquid than KR.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark X Case Answers

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Liquidity ratio. The firm’s liquidity shows a downward trend through time. The current ratio is decreasing because the growth in current liabilities outpaces the growth of current assets. The quick ratio is also declining but not as fast as the current ratio. From 1991 to 1992, it only decreased 0.35 units while the current ratio decreased 0.93 units. Looking at the common size balance sheet, we also see that the percentage of inventory is growing from 33% to 48% indicating Mark X could not convert its inventory to cash.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Liquidity

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ford’s liquidity has improved over the past 3 years. From 2007 to 2008, liquidity went down, but improved in 2009 better than 2007. Ford has the ability to pay for its current liabilities 1.39 times and without assets, Ford has the ability to pay for its current liabilities 1.28 times, which means they do not have to rely on sales of inventory. For 2009, Ford’s quick ratio was 1.28 and their current ratio was 1.39 which both we better than the industry average which was .90 and 1.17, respectively. Ford’s liquidity in 2009 was better than most of their peers which means their liquidity position is strong.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In assessing an organization’s financial health, one of the most important measures that investors look at is liquidity. Since it indicates the organization’s ability to ward off short-term threats, it is especially important for an organization to maintain a certain level of liquidity that will assure its survival, in case the need arises.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The higher the current ratio, the greater the liquidity of the corporate assets. The generally believed that the a reasonable minimum current ratio is 200%. According to the table 1, it shows us the current ratio both in 200Y and in 200Z are below 200%, and the current ratios are declined year by year. However, the selected industry ratios are rising year by year and greater than 200% in 200Y and 200Z. It implies that the Lamar Swimwear 's debt paying ability is less than average and trending downward. Nonetheless, the liquidity analysis just with current ratio is limited, and the quick ratio make up for this limitation. Both current ratio and quick ratio are reflected the liquidity of the…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Motor Company Case

    • 1266 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Exhibit 6, 8, and 9 (figures in $ millions) provides selected balance sheet items for Ford, General Motors, and DaimlerChrylser. The given information indicates that Ford carries the highest amount of cash and marketable securities among the three companies. In 1999, Ford had $25,173 of cash and marketable securities while General Motors and Daimler-Chrylser have only $12,140 and $9,163. Comparing at an industry level, we as a team inferred that Ford may be carrying too much cash.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lazonick, W. and O’Sullivan, M. (2000) “Maximizing shareholder value : A new ideology for corporate governance.” Economy and society, 29(1), 13-35…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although these assumptions made by MM are unrealistic, they have indicated and provided us clues on what is required for capital structure to be relevant and what affects a firm’s value. (Brigham et al, 2004)…

    • 5736 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hackbarth, D. (2008). Managerial Traits and Capital Structure Decisions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(4).…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Financial Analyst

    • 2870 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Spiceland, David; Wayne “Cash and Internal Controls”. Financial Accounting. Stewart Mattson. Chicago: Tim Vertovec, 2011. 158. Print.…

    • 2870 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ebben, J. J. and Johnson, A. C. (2011). Cash conversion cycle management in small firms: Relationships with liquidity, invested capital, and firm performance. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Volume 24, Number 3, 381-396.…

    • 9288 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working Capital

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Working capital is the cash needed to pay for the day­to­day operation of the business…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William J. Baumol developed a model (The transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach) which is usually used in Inventory management & cash management.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays