Preview

Should Assisted Suicide Be Legalized?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1970 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Assisted Suicide Be Legalized?
Should Assisted Suicide Be Legalised?

The status and legality of assisted suicide have long been debated in the UK. It is an undeniably sensitive topic and the result of such debates have serious repercussions either way. There have been many attempts at reform, but in a strictly legal sense, the law remains the same, as when it was introduced in the Suicide Act of 1961 (SA). The main topic for discussion is whether legalisation is, in fact, needed and if such action would be proportionate when taking into considerations all the potential dangers and benefits. It seems useful to first explore the current legal standpoint, such as the Suicide Act as already mentioned, but also the guidelines and cases that have substantially altered the law.
…show more content…
Most of the cases brought before the courts are based on human rights and typically art 8, the right to private and family life. The most impactful cases here are: Purdy (as mentioned above) and Pretty v UK. As already discussed, the Purdy case lead to the release of the DPP guidelines. This decision was based on the lack of accessibility and foreseeability required under art 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Furthermore, this case, unlike the Diane Pretty case, did not go to the European Court of Human Right (ECtHR). Pretty sought a guarantee that her husband would not be prosecuted for assisting her in taking her own life. Her argument was based on the idea the right to life also includes an inherent “right to die”, but this argument was dismissed. She also argued that art 8 should apply, but seeing as this is not an absolute right, it needs to be carried out in accordance with the domestic law. They held this to be justified, as it is a matter of public interest. However, this reasoning makes it appear that the ECtHR did not necessarily disagree with her arguments, which is not surprising, as there is no clear evidence that the right to die is contrary to the European Convention of Human rights 1953. However, the ECtHR is clearly reluctant to interfere with domestic law and leaves these matters up for the member states’ own interpretation. In more recent developments, there were two applications brought to the ECtHR that sought to challenge the ban on assisted suicide, by arguing it was incompatible with art 8. The cases of Nicklinson and Lamb were both held to be inadmissible and was not considered in the ECtHR. They based this dismissal on previous case law (mainly Pretty) and the several reform attempts in the UK. These considerations made the UK’s position clear and the ECtHR did not want to make

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The word Euthanasia derives from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos which means easy or good death. Euthanasia is is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma[1]. Euthanasia exists in various forms, each one specific in its criteria. Firstly there is active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves the use of direct action in order to end the patient’s life whilst passive euthanasia is the withholding of medical aid in order to allow the patient to die naturally such as not performing life-extending surgery or turning off a life support system. The next distinction is between Voluntary and Involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia involves the patient’s termination at their own request whilst involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unable to ably make a decision and therefore a suitable person makes the decision for them. Indirect euthanasia involves treating the patients pain but with the side effect of death, the primary intention is often used to justify the outcome. This is often referred to as the doctrine of double effect and in reality is not considered euthanasia given that the real purpose of the treatment is pain relief and death is merely seen as the side-affect. Finally there is assisted suicide which involves a patient incapable of committing suicide themselves asks for assistance in doing so. Euthanasia is a controversial topic that contradicts the age old moral injunction “thou shalt not kill”[2]. But similarly denying patient’s of this choice is defying medical practice cornerstones such as the patient’s autonomy and promoting their best interests. Different countries hold varying stances on Euthanasia but it is currently illegal in the UK. Most recently the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man totally paralysed by locked-in syndrome requesting euthanasia, has come to the forefront of the debate. Given the right to take his case to…

    • 5500 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When we think about the idea of physician- assisted suicide, we most likely feel as though that the act itself should be considered murder. During 1997, The President at the time Bill Clinton signed into regulations “The assisted suicide funding restriction act”. The regulation omitted the use of federal monies to pay for physician assisted suicide, as well as euthanasia, and also mercy killings in the United States. According to the New England Journal of Medicine Physician assisted suicide is now currently legal in three states, they are Oregon, Washington,…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person knows what the circle of life consists of- to be born, to grow and to die. The lines between the right and wrongs of each are fuzzy and unclear. Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates and there are so many questions with no clear answers: who should and shouldn’t be allowed to assist in suicides? Should assisted suicide be just for the terminally ill, or for all? What protection will there be for the people? and the biggest question of all- is it right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is their own right. That there is a significant “difference between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die” (Breslow). Others however, believe The Suicide…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some of the most vocal against these laws are the Seniors Against Suicide, who claim that illness is never a reason to commit suicide and that assisted suicide is simply the easy way out of caring for a terminally ill loved one. The issue with this is that, while these members of this organization are more than welcome to have their own opinions, this is no basis to deny someone of their final wishes. The beauty of the Death with Dignity laws is that they are an option for mentally capable adults who fear the debilitating effects of their disease; it is not an enforced rule that applies to all people with six months to live. Not everyone follows the religious guidelines that proclaim suicide to be a sin, nor does everyone have the stamina to allow their infliction to overwhelm their being, but more importantly: no one should be forced to suffer when they do not have to. Now, to this, many would claim that instead of dying, the sufferer could substitute it with palliative care, which would ease the pain. However, this only alleviates a fraction of the problem; morphine does not stop the body from withering away, does not prevent the shadows under their eyes from forming, or eliminate the immense burden from everyone involved. As was mentioned previously, patients can also develop a resistance…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder. Killing someone unlawfully with forethought. A doctor prescribes a patient with medicine strong enough to kill them and they die, but they still had life. The doctor’s signature signed on the most important oath a physician can take, but they violate and fracture their own agreement. Loved ones die, the family only shocked to hear of the alternate choice that was available, treatment. Physician assisted suicide may take the suffering away, but perhaps the suffering was going to get better. Physician assisted suicide should be banned because it violates the hippocratic oath, treatment is accessible, and life may still be available.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    their own life and what they want to do with it, and it reduces financial problems of hospital…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia is a widely debated and controversial topic in our society. It is believed that the principle of PAS and euthanasia portrays, “merciful acts that deliver terminally ill patients from painful and protracted death” (page 477, column 2). In the paper, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View,” John D. Arras discusses the subject and states that while he agrees with patients making decisions, implementing laws supporting PAS and euthanasia is a huge threat to our social order. However, John D. Arras also concludes that he does not disapprove with the possibility of having a legislative policy in favor of PAS/euthanasia, only if there is “sufficient evidence of reliability of various safeguards” (page 477, column 2).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of its existence, the sole purpose of the health care industry is to increase the quality of life. However, when a patient’s life is coming to an end, healthcare professionals strive to provide a comfortable death with minimal pain. With today’s doctors having new technology, medicines, and techniques, the ethics of assisted suicide has become a great debate between the public, the government, and health professionals. Dr. David Mayo and Daniel Callahan are both professionals in the healthcare industry and have varying viewpoints in regards to the effectiveness, position, and purpose of assisted suicide.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supporters of assisted suicide believe that this act benefit terminally ill patients by relieving their suffering. This is probably one of the reasons why Netherlands court determined that a physician is allowed to prevent severe and irreversible suffering, even if it reduces patient’s life (Bosshard et al, 2002). The act of assisted suicide or active euthanasia is allowed in Netherlands, Switzerland and Oregon under different conditions and legislations. The situation can be seen differently in places, where by moral and legal discourse; assisted suicide is interpreted as the freedom or right of the individual as in Switzerland and some states of US. From the ethical perspective, patient’s choice of suicide represents an expression of self- determination and while exercising self- determination people take responsibility of their lives and for the kind of person they become. They have a right to refuse the life- sustaining treatment if they don’t want to suffer anymore and according to law, physicians must respect their decisions to forgo life- sustaining treatment that are capable of making their end of life decisions. By refusing life- sustaining treatment, terminally ill people know that they are going to die soon and in order to avoid suffering or pain they ask physicians for assistance to end their…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide is one topic that many countries have yet to tackle. Considering the many complex issues and underlying controversies, there is no doubt that the idea of taking one's life with medical collaboration is one of many criterias. There are many benefits for those individuals affected by terminal illnesses and irreversible damages to their health (i.e. AIDS or Parkinson’s Disease), such as removing the pain from their lives and allowing their families to be at peace knowing that they are no longer in harm’s way, but suicide in and of itself is a difficult challenge to defend. The act of taking one’s life is one that has been fought against for years, and…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is assisting a loved one to die morally acceptable or is it murder? This essay will look at both sides of this argument and leave the reader to decide which side they more agree with. The main article I will be looking at is the one by Susan M. Wolf and the death of her sick father. There are two sides to this situation. One group of people feel that it is morally and lawfully wrong to help in the death of any person, regardless of who they are and believe the culprit to be just as guilty as a murderer. Others will argue that it is only helping to speed up a process that is inevitably coming and helping a person to quit the pain is human nature showing sympathy and courage. In this essay, I will be looking at both sides of this argument and leave it to the reader to decide which argument he believes to be more reasonable.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide needs to be legalized everywhere because it is only legal in some states and some countries. People should be able to have the choice to request physician assisted suicide, even though there are guidelines to be met, the option should be available wherever you live. There are some positives and negatives of physician assisted suicide but the positives outweigh the negatives.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide is defined as a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, medical practitioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death. An assisted suicide is usually a situation where a patient is terminally ill, and a doctor prescribes a lethal dose of medication for the patient to ingest when they choose. Another way this is done is when the doctor discontinues giving certain treatment, at request of the patient. The conflict of whether assisted suicide is right or wrong has many different branches in the aspects of ethical, social, and legal issues, often with two main arguments; on the supporting side, people say that everyone should have the right to decide the time, place, and circumstances of his/her death, while the opposing side of this issue state that assisted suicide infers that certain people’s lives are…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assisted Suicide Speech

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page

    People all over the world have a misconception about what the term ‘assisted suicide’ truly entails. Assisted suicide is suicide committed with the aid of another person, most times a caretaker, family member or physician. Assisted suicide is becoming more and more common across the world. With the House of Lords trying to pass a bill to legalize assisted suicide in the UK and the continuously rising rates in Switzerland. While there is no federal law involving assisted suicide in the U.S, the act is legal in five states. Some people like to believe that they are helping their terminally or mentally ill family member or friend when it comes to this act, but are they really? I believe that the government should set boundaries and explain in…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, between 1990 and 1999, a well-known advocate for physician assisted suicide, Jack Kevorkian helped 130 patients end their lives. He begun the debate on assisted suicide should be legal or should be illegal. Kevorkian believed in the right to die, “The voluntary self-elimination of individual and mortally diseased or crippled lives taken collectively can only enhance the preservation of public health and welfare” (Kevorkian). He created his own machine that would be used to give the patient a mixture of pain killers and poisons to end a patient’s life. Kevorkian was charged with first degree murder for the death of one of his patients he had helped end their life. Kevorkian tried to get a ballot…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays