Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Should Rich Countries Pay More for Environmental Damage?

Satisfactory Essays
313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Rich Countries Pay More for Environmental Damage?
Today, the callfor saving our earth has been emphasized in the worldwide. In this case, many environmentalists claim that rich nations should bear more responsibilities for the environmental unbalance than poorer nations. In this essay, I would like to look at some of the reasons why advanced countries should be responsible for the damage they have done to our earth.

First of all, developed countries have their historical responsibility and obligation to pay more for the worsening environment. It is believed that, in the last two hundred years during the process of industrialization, a great amount of environmental debt has been owed by rich nations. They have consumed enormous natural resources and released immeasurable amount of greenhouse gases and the development they made was based on the sacrifice of the environment.

Second, according to United Nations Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (UNMEA) , developed countries only account for fifteen per cent of the world’s population, but use over eighty five per cent of its resources. In order to satisfy their high consumption of lifestyle, a form of environmental colonism has recently been developed by transferring their resource-intensive and polluting industries to developing countries. Without these industries, it seems that rich nations have their environmental standard raised so as to combat the global environmental crisis. However, they turn a blind eye on the reality that any problems can be relocated except the pollution.

Furthermore, in terms of the existing situation of environmental damage, developed countries are capable of making more efforts financially and scientifically. For example, sufficient funds can be provided for poorer countries to control pollution and new energy efficient technology can be developed to cater for the demand of human activities.

In conclusion, taking all the above arguments into consideration, advanced countries are essential to control and ameliorate the environmental crisis and they should bear more responsibilitiesto the damage in our planet.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The basic causes of today’s environmental problems are population growth, wasteful use of resources, the tragedy of the commons, poverty, poor environment accounting, and ecological ignorance. They are interconnected because of political and economic practices that are not equitable for various populations, in resource consumption and in technological applications.…

    • 4269 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    loc template

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page

    We know how to recognize good behavior. We write solid EPRs, express our gratitude in Letters of Appreciation, or submit deserving members for medals. But how do we deal with bad behavior? What instruments of military law are available for counseling Airmen and correcting improper behavior? There are a range of options available from verbal counseling to Article 15s to administrative discharge. In general, most of us only have to deal with those methods appropriate for correcting behavior at the workcenter level. These administrative tools, in order of rising level of seriousness, are:…

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary of Affluenza

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the reported in a 1998 article in Parade magazine, the environmental pollution is more and more serious in most countries. Although natural disaster always happens in some countries, people are still spending as much as before so that people are deeper in debt than ever. Although the good news is guaranteeing continued economic growth, people always try to filter the bad news. People cannot…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first source, it’s ideological perspective is the contrast between the mass consumption and unsustainability of the smaller population of North America with the very large population of sustainable countries like Asia and Africa. Source II and III bring up the point that the growth of businesses and governments do not always benefit the global environment and economy. The first perspective shows how unstable and unsustainable the Earth’s resources are and that North America’s rate of production and consumption is double that of the closest consumer area. It shows that the Earth’s resources are in serious danger of being used up especially for countries that have already developed.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I am going to examine whether development in a country causes significant damage to the environment.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having discussed the overall relationship of the economy and the environment, the focus shall now be shifted towards the ways in which the economy often mistreats and takes advantage the environment purely for its benefit. Instances of oil spills and earthquakes caused by fracking only help cement this and many people would argue that this is the case. I will now delve deeper into the growing global belief that the economy and the environment aren’t as symbiotic as many believe.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affluent nations (Western Europe, US, Australia, Canada, Japan) make up 20 of the population and consume 80 of the world’s resources each year.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, environmentalists are focusing too much on environmental degradation and totally ignoring about the improvement in environmental condition. They fail to address the cases of environmental improvement. For example: according to "The economist" in the article "The east is gray" America and Europe combined are cutting down their emissions by 60m tones a year in spite of increase in industrial activities.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, with continued global warming, environmental problems will occur as due to excessive resource use such as with the USA consuming around 25% of global resources. As global governance suggested, it wishes to reduce greenhouse gases and resource consumption, which in this day and age may be hard to do as due to our technological boom. It is interesting how the US committed to the Copenhagen Change Summit in order to reduce carbon dioxide from coal-based power generation to solar and natural gas production. Through these drastic changes it suggests a better world is to come in the near future, as with…

    • 1358 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sustainability of our environment is crucial in saving the livelihood of the people and the planet. Since we are all interdependent, we will all have to do our part in sustaining our environment for the future. We should always be questioning and doing more about it rather than just talking or ignoring the facts. Most of us do not realize the excessive use of resources we have taken advantage of over the years. Generations past have exploited our planet which has resulted much to the endangered state it is in today. The resources on Earth are finite and they will become extinct whenever the maximum limits are reached. Moreover, not only are we using natural resources to benefit our own needs; after we use them, we often return them back to the earth under worse conditions, in turn progressively threatening the environment.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of whether mankind is dangerously or negatively harming the environment has been a debate over a long period of time. Individuals and scholars make quite compelling arguments on either spectrum of the issue. From the argument between Lester Brown and Bjorn Lomborg, it is evident that the debates on this issue may continue for a much longer period of time. Both authors did agree to some extent that humans do deplete the earth’s resources; however Lester Brown had a more sonorous argument because he equated the effects of such depletions towards the livelihood of mankind.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper explores Stephen Gardiner essay, “Ethics and Global Climate Change”. It examines Gardiner’s argument that, “the richer nations should pay more of the cost for addressing global warming”. It takes a look at his reasons for believing this. Our textbook was utilized to write this paper.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recognizing that developed countries are principally responsible for the current high levels of GHG emissions in the atmosphere as a result of more than 150 years of industrial activity, the Protocol places a heavier burden on developed nations under the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities (Kyoto Protocol, 2012).…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case study 7

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page

    4. Give your stand and specify the reason on “Should or should not poor countries pay the price for pollution”?…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Environment

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For decades, humans use natural resources for their development. Today, we pay for this exploitation. Human lifestyle are responsible of many effects on environment: global warming, climate change, depletion of Ozone layer, deforestation, pollution, extinction of species… With depleting resources of nature, certain ways to save the environment have to be formulated. But who can do something to save the planet: people or governments? This essay will discuss this issue.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays