Preview

Should Schools Be Allowed To Search Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Schools Be Allowed To Search Essay
In 1984, fourteen year old T.L.O ( her full name was never disclosed due to her age ) was called down to the principal’s office after she was discovered smoking in the girl’s bathroom. T.L.O’s purse was searched and school administrators found cigarettes, one dollar bills, a small amount of marijuana, and other items. T.L.O had stated that she had not been smoking, however, her friend admitted to doing so. After being taken to the police station, T.L.O admitted to selling marijuana at school and smoking in the bathroom. It’s cases like this that emphasize why it’s so important to grant school administrators the right to search its students with reasonable suspicion and probable cause. The most common items that are searched through at schools are lockers, cell phones, bookbags, and the occasional body search. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” However, when a student is on school grounds, schools can use “reasonable suspicion” and aren’t required to present a warrant to search a student. …show more content…
Savana’s mother sued the school district and took her case to district court. The district court determined that Savana’s Fourth Amendment rights had not been violated. Savana then took her case to the supreme court where it was concluded that Savana’s Fourth Amendment rights had been violated. The court voted 8-1, in favor of Savana. However, the court also stated that the school administrators were entitled to qualified immunity. This was because at the time of the search, Savana’s unconstitutionality was not expressed. It's cases like Savana’s that show the ugly side of school searches if not properly executed. However, if properly done, school searches can be a positive impact on a school and its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A teacher found two girls smoking in the bathroom in a school located in New Jersey. Upon arrival to the principal’s office for disciplinary actions, one of the girls admitted to smoking, while the other (whose initials are T.L.O.) denied any wrongdoing. The principal ended up searching the girl’s purse which contained evidence to prove she was smoking in the bathroom along with marijuana paraphernalia. She eventually admitted to using this paraphernalia for selling marijuana in school. Using the evidence found within the purse and the confession, she was charged and taken into juvenile court where she was eventually sentenced to a year’s probation. T.L.O argued that her 4th amendment rights had been violated…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although students do not lose their rights as they walk through the school gates, their rights are restricted for the safety of others. The court case of Tinker v. Des Moines argues the same issue of the rights of students while on school grounds. “Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students” (OYEZ). As the armbands distracted students, the inappropriate photos of Suzie distracted upperclassmen from their educational work, which also put Suzie in an uncomfortable position depriving herself the ability to focus 100% on school work. Therefore, the principal was taking away a distraction to discipline the students which can be compared to the case of Tinker v. Des…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After this discovery he continued to search the purse thoroughly and found some marijuana, a pipe, plastic bags, money, an index card containing a list of students who owed TLO money, and two letters that signaled her in marijuana dealing. So everything being discovered now will be used against her in court. After the discovering of these items in TLO purse she was taken to the Juvenile Court and received delinquency charges which,in court TLO tried to say that her 4th Amendment was violated but the court said the search conducted by the Vice Principal was reasonable because TLO was a delinquent. On the contrary The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court came to the conclusion that there was a Fourth Amendment violation. The New Jersey Supreme Court said, holding that the search of the purse was unreasonable. She was sentenced to one year probation and brought up on charges by the local authorities. Though the Supreme Court did not say that the Fourth Amendment did not apply to students. The Fourth Amendment states that a search and seizure cannot be lawfully conducted without a warrant or probable cause. However, in a school setting, a search is considered to be reasonable and within the constraints of the Fourth Amendment if there is reasonable suspicion…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1990s this case was used a number of times in the Supreme Court to allow metal detectors and other protective searches in schools. Also, this case was used as a precedent for Bethel School District vs. Fraser in…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding citizens' protections against unreasonable searches and seizures a right guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. In 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court a practice known as the exclusionary rule. In 1980, a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey, found T.L.O. and another girl smoking in a restroom a place that was by school rule a nonsmoking area. The two girls were taken to the principal's office where T.L.O.'s friend admitted that she had been smoking in the restroom. T.L.O. denied smoking there. She denied that she smoked at all. An assistant vice-principal demanded to see T.L.O.'s purse. Searching through it he found a pack of cigarettes. He also found rolling papers, a pipe, marijuana, a large wad of dollar bills, and two letters that indicated that T.L.O. was involved in marijuana dealing at the high school. T.L.O. was taken to the police station where she confessed that she had sold marijuana at the school. A juvenile court sentenced her to a year's probation. The State Supreme Court overturned the decision, stating that T.L.O.'s 4th Amendment rights had been violated. But White agreed with a lower court finding that a “school official may properly conduct a search of a student's person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline….” In other words, in a school, a search could be reasonable under the 4th Amendment without probable cause, so long as it was supported by reasonable suspicion or reasonable cause. The assistant vice-principal's search was considered reasonable under this definition. In 1985, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 margin, ruled that New Jersey and the school had met a "reasonableness" standard for conducting such searches at school. The high court…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Jersey vs. T.L.O

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The students were then accompanied to the Vice -Principal Theodore Choplick’s office. During a somewhat interrogation Choplick questioned them about violating a school rule by smoking in the bathroom. The first girl admitted to smoking, but T.L.O denied that she had been smoking in the bathroom and stated she had never smoked in her life. Choplick then asked TLO into his private office where he furthered interrogated her and demanded she hand over her purse. Upon opening the purse he discovered a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, a small gram of marijuana, a pipe, empty plastic bags, a stack of one –dollar bills, an index card that appeared to list students who owed TLO money, and two letters that implicated T.L.O’s involment in dealing marijuana. The Vice -Principal then called the police and the girl's mother, who voluntarily drove her to the police station. At the police station, T.L.O confessed that she had been selling marijuana at school; therefore the state of New Jersey filed charges against her in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Middlesex County and placed her under one year probation. T.L.O claimed that the evidence couldn’t…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill” involves students and their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that citizens are free from unreasonable search and seizure from the government. However, school administration (an extension of government) does have the power to implement searches and seizures that may be outside of the constitutional scope in order to maintain good order and discipline in the school. This is evidenced by the Supreme Court case New Jersey vs. T.L.O where the Supreme Court ruled that requiring schools to obtain warrants for searches would interfere with the swift and informal disciplinary procedures needed in schools. However, the Supreme Court also stated that there must be reasonable grounds to conduct a search and it is limited to individualized suspicion and not group searches. Students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school grounds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - court agreed that searches by school officials do not violate the Fourth Amendment as long as the official has “ reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that would interfere with school discipline…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For countless years, students have been drug tested, while teachers remain un-involved. Although teachers can request at any time that a student get drug tested, students are unable to request for teachers to be tested. People may believe that a teacher should not be tested, but they have just as much access, if not more, to drugs as students do. Therefore; drug testing should be required for teachers. Besides the biological parents, teachers have a powerful influence over students. If a person is going to have a career that molds the teens in our society, regardless of whatever opinion the teacher may have about marijuana or heroin, he or she should ensue the rules that have been provided by our government.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays